December 15, 2016

Interview with woman who won lawsuit against Montreal mosque

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator
 

The Rebel reported on a Quebec secular-feminist and journalist, Djemila Benhabib, who won a lawsuit by a Montreal mosque, which she had accused of running a military style schooling for children, similar to what you might find in Afghanistan:

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-12-16 23:48:51 -0500
This woman may have won this battle against an Islamic mosque, but it still remains that Quebec, as a result of the ‘quiet revolution’ in the 60’s also discriminates against Jews and Catholics. Quebec was once a vibrant Catholic province with the highest birthrate and is now basically void of Catholic Churches…and the lowest birthrate in Canada.
This was a victory for the specific reasons she accused them of, which for that specific reason I applaud her, but it is part of the [new] Quebec position taken on religion, any religion, not to mention English.
Quebec wanted to be part of [secular] France, that’s why we bought the funny passports in the 70’s.
commented 2016-12-16 22:11:02 -0500
A good reminder that Montrealers are not just interested in barring Orthodox Jews from practicing their faith and culture. Muslims and Roman Catholics are subject to the same criticisms sometimes.
commented 2016-12-16 14:12:41 -0500
This young woman is to be commended for her stance for a secular society versus a religious society. She made many great rebuttals supporting her opinions.
commented 2016-12-16 13:10:37 -0500
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 32,443 Attacks, 207,979 Killed, 291,058 Injured that we know of.
commented 2016-12-16 09:29:32 -0500
It came as a rude surprise to the feminists who Ken Weibe took to court that the ideology of feminism has no special protected legal status in Canada and that Canada was not the campus of a university writ large.

Under Sharia law saying anything that causes someone to loose face is “slander”…but in Canada truth and fair comment are still a defence.

Contrary to common misinformation the SCC decision regarding truth not being a defence was specifically in reference to an attempt to strike down section 13 of the HRA before parliament struck it down. This was because the HRA is legislation of civil remedy not criminal code and there is no jepardy of incarceration except if you are held in contempt of court. Truth and fair comment are still a defence under 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code.

The lawyers who act on behalf of the islamists are either islamists themselves or they are sheisters who are willing to take fees without propery disclosing to their clients that there is little hope of winning such a case.
commented 2016-12-16 08:06:41 -0500
No Liza…trudeau’s head would not spin off because the globalist little puke knows EXACTLY what he is doing.
commented 2016-12-16 03:14:17 -0500
You’re right Keith she was given a lot of credence to the ‘moderate Muslim’ theory. That does seem naive. But she is right about the veil.
commented 2016-12-16 02:30:15 -0500
This Woman is completely delusional, She appears to believe that Muslims are here because they are running away from the tyranny of their own Country’s and want to become civilized. She had better understand, Muslims are only here to dominate and kill off the white race, her included.
commented 2016-12-16 01:17:59 -0500
She should be invited to speak in our Parliament. Justin’s head would spin off.
commented 2016-12-16 01:00:00 -0500
This woman and her story must be quite the conundrum for progressives.
commented 2016-12-16 00:59:14 -0500
Secularism should be a protected right in a free country, sadly it is a huge number of secular people on the left who are not too keen on protecting it when it some to certain groups.
commented 2016-12-16 00:32:04 -0500
so …the court concludes – she was right ! …
Islam is a death cult and the Koran should not be allowed in the country
commented 2016-12-15 23:59:17 -0500
Good for her
Maybe EZRA or FAITH could do an interview one day