February 26, 2018

Is Clooney’s anti-gun rhetoric just another Tinseltown role?

David MenziesMission Specialist


Hollywood A-lister George Clooney made headlines when he announced he would donate $500K to the upcoming student anti-gun protest in Washington called “The March for Our Lives.”

Clooney is part of an elite that profess to hate guns and gun culture, yet hypocritically, routinely accept lucrative roles in films that centre on guns.

If he’s so anti-gun, why doesn’t he put his money where his mouth is and tell filmmakers that he won’t appear in movies that glorify guns?

Maybe it’s because he doesn’t want to be reduced to being the romantic lead in a never-ending stream of vacuous chick-flicks.

The National Rifle Association publishes a list of anti-gun Hollywood talent who continue to star in films in which guns play an integral role in advancing the plot.

In the end, these virtue-signalling actors talk a mean game on banning guns, but don’t avoid roles that feature a lot of gunplay because that would severely curtail their earnings.

Do these stars really want to see the Second Amendment repealed, or is this merely another role they play in Tinseltown’s land of make-believe?

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-02-28 02:39:36 -0500
Since the purpose of Hollywood since day one has been to create “fantasy”, it is not unexpected that “actors” are prepared to create illusion – and now Political Illusion – while living behind a barrier of gated communities, high walls, and armed guards protecting their delicate butts… And further, consider the psychological implications of choosing to live in a world of “illusion”!… These are about to tell us what should be our social values… Go snort some more “blow” Barbara Streisand!…
commented 2018-02-27 01:13:56 -0500
Self important left wing virtue signaling idiots rarely put their money where their mouths are.
commented 2018-02-26 21:11:49 -0500
Deborah, I think that’s an accurate theory.
commented 2018-02-26 18:49:57 -0500
It’s likely not even his money. He’s funneling money for those who wish to disarm the citizens.
commented 2018-02-26 16:37:44 -0500
No one gets it. Hollywood has always been filled with a pile of phonies.
commented 2018-02-26 15:51:22 -0500
Menz, I don’t have a problem with anti-gun actors acting in movies that feature guns. Sure, they’re hypocrites, but It’s all to the good, really. First, the depiction of ‘bad guys (and gals)’ wreaking havoc on innocent people might one day make them realize that the conservative point of view on gun ownership makes sense. It could help them to understand what the world would be like if only the bad people had guns and the rest of us were completely defenseless. Strangely, school shootings, in which innocent children are mowed down by lunatics or terrorists because their schools are ‘gun-free zones’ (i.e the ultimate soft targets in which innocent children are rendered completely defenseless), don’t seem to do it. So maybe one day George Clooney will watch one of his own movies and clue in.

People throughout history have had the right to have some kind of weapon for defense of their person and their families. It’s only in our time that the leftist lunatics want to remove that right from us so we will be defenseless against them and their terrorist pals when they impose their dictatorship on us. So let the actors act in these films. After all, it’s educational. They help us understand what life would be like if the only people who had guns were the bad guys and gals, and the communists, and the terrorists who would like to mow down Canadians like disarmed European sheep. So I say, keep those movies coming. Let them know we have the means and the will to defend ourselves if need be. And, it’s about time we hardened our schools also. Right now our schoolchildren are completely vulnerable soft targets for terrorists and other lunatics. Will it take a Florida-style tragedy for our moron cultural Marxist politicians to wake up and safeguard our children? Alas, almost certainly.

Hey David, I hope the Rebels are taking steps to stay on the internet ‘air’ in case our cultural Marxist federal government shuts down this website, a very real possibility. I would suggest readying a facility in the USA.
commented 2018-02-26 15:16:37 -0500
- I wonder how many of these celebs have disarmed their security. For that matter, how many of the open borders celebs have an open door policy on their mansions? As for Clooney, you may recall that pro-refugee George Clooney moved his family back to America to escape terrorism after lecturing America about needing to accept more refugees. https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/george-clooney-moving-family-us-terrorism/
commented 2018-02-26 15:10:25 -0500
I’m quite certain all those lefty-Hollywood intellectual heavyweights and moral giants posing as actors, are able to completely rationalize and justify their hypocrisy…in their own diseased and delusional lefty minds. They’re actors you know.
Just ask Harvey Weinstein about the solid morality of the lefty-Hollywood actors credo…‘Go along to get along’.
commented 2018-02-26 14:55:38 -0500
Excellent video, Tammie. Among the equally hypocritical anti-gun types I suppose you could include Vincent Cassini. Of course, I’m assuming he’s not worth $500,000,000 so he’s pretty much irrelevant.
commented 2018-02-26 14:31:47 -0500
Apparently you don’t know the difference between acting ala make believe and real life. Does that mean if an actor plays a murderer – he condones murder? This is one of the dumbest arguments by gun lovers.