February 12, 2019

One day after Trudeau brags about having Jody Wilson-Raybould in his cabinet, she quits

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

As we've been reporting, the Globe and Mail released a bombshell, front page investigation into corruption at the engineering firm SNC Lavalin, and the pressure put on the former justice minister, Jody Wilson Raybould, to drop criminal charges against the company.

When Justin Trudeau first answered questions about it, he looked nervous and irritated. He gave overlawyered answers. Frankly, he looked like he was lying.

But then yesterday, a whole different thing happened.

Trudeau talked about the scandal with a grin, and a sparkle in his eyes. He look like a winner, who has won.

He said he still had "full confidence" in Wilson-Raybould, and added:

"In our system of government, of course, her presence in cabinet should actually speak for itself."

There was an implication there:

Not only was Wilson-Raybould happy to be part of Team Trudeau. She still had something to lose, didn’t she? He still had power over her, didn’t he?

Well, I don’t think she liked Trudeau's grin.

So she quit.

Her statement read, in part:

"I am aware that many Canadians wish for me to speak on matters that have been in the media over the last week. I am in the process of obtaining advice on the topics that I am legally permitted to discuss in this matter and as such, have retained the Honourable Thomas Alberta Cromwell, CC as counsel.”

She’s lawyered up, with a former Supreme Court judge as her lawyer. And she signed that letter "Puglaas," her Aboriginal name, which means "honourable."

As in: You can’t buy her off with a few baubles.

Trudeau has hired any number of grifters and grafters, as race and gender tokens, and they’d give him cover to do whatever he wants. It’s the best job any of them will ever have. They have no skills.

In Trudeau’s world, recruiting Jody Wilson-Raybould was the best of all, though:

An Aboriginal woman of colour from the west coast, the daughter of a hereditary chief. In the poker game of political correctness, that’s the royal flush.

What delicious irony that she’s the only one in Trudeau’s cabinet who actually acted with integrity and loyalty to the country...

NEXT: One of our favourite guests, consultant and lawyer Manny Montenegrino, joins me to discuss this developing story.

FINALLY: Your messages to me!

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2019-02-16 01:19:22 -0500
Karen.. go away.!!
commented 2019-02-15 21:36:33 -0500
You simply can’t resist proving yet again that you are indeed a red in a faux blue suit “Karen” simply trolling this site to spam the threads. Well at least you are good for a laugh though it is at your own expense. LMAO @ you
commented 2019-02-15 21:26:50 -0500
commented 2019-02-15 10:56:17 -0500
Everything about me? LOL hardly “Karen”, but judging several articles as of late you think that you are the center of the universe and continually spam the threads as to what YOU think is of great import even if totally unrelated to the article. Get a grip, your RED is showing too clearly as of late. You keep proving you are a red in a faux blue suit, priceless LMAO.
commented 2019-02-15 10:02:06 -0500
Who said I was quoting you?
Is everything about you now?
It is a popular term coined in in the 1600’s!
I quoted the dictionary! https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/henpeck#examples
People can do that in common discussion without a citation but since everything must be to your standards, you can shove off when addressing me.
People can also respond with emojjis in common language these days. Heck, its the new age of hieroglyphs.
Something primitative people such as some commentators on this page are old enough to understand.
Bye now! 👋
commented 2019-02-15 00:06:29 -0500
HYACINTH commented 17 hours ago
Karen Macleod commented 5 hours ago
“Did you ever realize you’re called “Charred Remains” after how many times you get burned in a debate? "

Like "Karen Macleod commented 10 hours ago
😂😂😂👇👇👇💁 " is debating …NOT
I don’t know about that… I think Hyacinth knows exactly what she’s talking about.!! A bunch of emoji‘s does not a debate make.. you’re kind would reduce the English language to a bunch of smiley faces so you can use hieroglyphics to communicate instead of words and sentences.! And did you notice anything about Keith when he got corrected… He bailed out and he hasn’t been back to support you.. Did you notice that he got a free pass.?? I know he did.! One time free pass for those that don’t know any better at the time. Did you notice anything else.??Probably not so I’ll leave it at that.. I’ll let your Mensa super powers kick in and you can use them to find what you didn’t see immediately.! But then again there are none so blind as they that will not see.!
commented 2019-02-14 23:58:53 -0500
Are you going to debate some more with little clouds and laughing faces “Karen”? True to leftard form and talking points – no where did i say “hen pecking” yet you claim I did, such a leftard troll, get new material.
commented 2019-02-14 23:10:06 -0500
I disagree with Hyacinth quite strongly Keith except don’t believe in what’s commonly called “hen pecking” by some as to my belief.
commented 2019-02-14 14:14:20 -0500
Just like I thought.. you’re just a hit-and-run artist by making a comment and don’t want come back and cut to the truth.. do you pretend to be a conservative here and vote Liberal other places .??
By the way.. read Hyacinth’s posting again. I don’t think people appreciate you speaking for them because that’s what Justin Trudeau does.!!
commented 2019-02-14 13:17:43 -0500
And Keith .. maybe you should read Hyacinth’s last comment one more time.!!
commented 2019-02-14 11:16:03 -0500
I displayed the video by itself just above the thread where I originally posted it so you would have a greater idea what it was about and if I could encourage you to watch it. Sometimes the truth leaves a bitter taste in people‘s mouth’s and causes them to react badly until realization replaces indoctrination.
commented 2019-02-14 11:02:08 -0500
commented 2019-02-14 11:01:49 -0500
You’re not a hypocrite are you Keith.?? Or are you a racist.?? Were you raised in a family of racists.?? Personally I think probably not but you should watch this video.
commented 2019-02-14 10:29:20 -0500
I take it Keith that you like to run under a narrative rather than to read every comment.. but if you notice I’m not saying anything derogatory to you because you’re attacking me out of ignorance not fact.!!
commented 2019-02-14 10:25:46 -0500
Especially when I’m getting trolled.!!
commented 2019-02-14 10:25:11 -0500
Thanks Keith.. personally I just like to get both sides of the story.
commented 2019-02-14 10:21:18 -0500
The story in, uh, the, uh, uh, Globe and, uh, Mail is false. Uh, neither I, uh, uh, nor anyone on my, uh, staff, directed the, uh, justice minister to, uh, intervene in the, uh, uh, SNC Lavalin proceeding, which is, uh, uh, before the, uh, courts. I repeat, the story in the, uh, Globe, uh, and Mail, uh, uh, is false. Neither I, uh, uh, uh, nor anyone, uh, on my staff, uh, uh, uh, directed the, uh, justice minister to, uh, intervene in the, uh, the, uh, uh, SNC Lavalin proceeding. Sincerely, Rt Honourable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada
commented 2019-02-14 09:59:57 -0500
Charred Remains would be better called ‘Burnt Excrement’ for the garbage he has espoused.
Karen and Hyacinth, both do a good job, belittling this Motley Troll who is likely a Choir Boy, hiding behind a Comment Box.
commented 2019-02-14 06:47:12 -0500
Karen Macleod commented 5 hours ago
“Did you ever realize you’re called “Charred Remains” after how many times you get burned in a debate? "

Like "Karen Macleod commented 10 hours ago
😂😂😂👇👇👇💁 " is debating …NOT

Leftards are so delusional.
commented 2019-02-14 03:14:44 -0500
You can’t put the dead on the stand beyond proving motive to my understanding.
commented 2019-02-14 01:25:02 -0500
Did you ever realize you’re called “Charred Remains” after how many times you get burned in a debate?
Its all about your observations eh?
Observation noun definition:
a remark, statement, or comment based on something one has seen, heard, or noticed.
Keep making statements. Never stop.
commented 2019-02-13 22:50:36 -0500
Ya.. just like I thought.!!
commented 2019-02-13 21:03:55 -0500
commented 2019-02-13 21:03:29 -0500
Are you saying there’s purebred natives left … to say that there’s not does not imply I said they were Savage and furthermore it’s not a racist remark… I think you are grasping at straws‘s and looking pathetic in your attempt to de-platform me .
commented 2019-02-13 21:02:06 -0500
In fact the way you have those down in point you’re trying to build a case… At a nowhere or anytime don’t make any implications that Jody Wilson was a savage… I call you out again is a liar timestamps I’m after time stamps.
commented 2019-02-13 21:00:59 -0500
“She’s definately not a criminal Charred.”

That’s a matter of opinion and complex law I’m sure..
“Sorry but none of my cousins married each other… Only royalty and savages do that.!!”
Ya… I think I addressed that one already.
commented 2019-02-13 20:18:30 -0500
Oh, did I make an observation, Charred?
You used the word “savage” and I quoted “savage”.
You said "
Keeping in mind that her tribe may have practice cannibalism in the 1900s as did a few tribes along the West Coast and inland natives as well. She is an activist and a criminal.!"
You also said,
" There’s not a purebred native left in this country and 50% of them don’t even roll with 50% DNA… And speaking of DNA there is a lot of inbreeding because of isolated gene pools in tribal pockets dotted throughout the north that doesn’t have the means to frequently add fresh DNA that’s required for healthy minds and bodies, they have been doing that for years until the white man got here and built a society for them as they were unable to build anything for themselves beyond primitive Stone Age tools and portable shelters out of skins.!!"
Then you said,
“Sorry but none of my cousins married each other… Only royalty and savages do that.!!”
The definition of a “savage” is as such
a brutal or vicious person.
“the mother of one of the victims has described his assailants as savages”.
She’s definately not a criminal Charred.
Is she a vicious person because her tribe may have practiced cannibalism?
Who is lying w a forked tongue now?
Just because you didn’t day “Puglaas is” or “JWR is” doesn’t mean what you said was your stayed opinion but rather a skewed version of facts.
I hope she sues your ass off.
commented 2019-02-13 19:20:11 -0500
“ Ah, just go back to calling Puglaas a “savage” for your credibility, Charred Remains.
“You are a liar.. I call you out as a liar.!!! For your credibility please go back and quote me including the timestamp where I called JWR a savage.. you made some mention of some people lmarrying their relatives and I said only royalty and savages do that.. you have no shame, no moral compunction and no dignity so you automatically assume that everybody is as hollowed out as you are.!!
commented 2019-02-13 18:31:16 -0500
That’s not my observation, its a rule of language.
Don’t mansplain me! Lol.
Ah, just go back to calling Puglaas a “savage” for your credibility, Charred Remains.
commented 2019-02-13 18:31:10 -0500
That’s not my observation, its a rule of language.
Don’t mansplain me! Lol.
Ah, just go back to calling Puglaas a “savage” for your credibility, Charred Remains.