March 27, 2016

Judge in UK enforces sharia, orders father not to take son to church

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator

The list of official sharia-compliant judge's orders which defy common law and equality before the law and comply to sharia norms grows long in the UK.

In Today's Daily Mail, a story about a father who was ordered not to take his son to Church because his mother is a Muslim and won a court order to stop him from doing so. 

A British father has been banned from taking his son to a church after the boy's Muslim mother won a controversial court order preventing the boy from attending.

The father – a non-practising Muslim who has forged close connections to his local Christian community and is divorced from the boy's mother – has been warned that he could be denied access to the nine-year-old if he attempts to take him to church or to a leisure centre it runs.

The mother's reasoning is fear that the child may become "confused".  The father's reasoning is the classical reasoning of Western civilization since the Greeks. Exposure to more ideas to decide for oneself what is the best course of action for the self. 

The courts however have elected to go with sharia compliancy instead of Western thought or law. No freedom-to-decide for Muslim children. It is in fact, against their faith. Death to apostates and so on.

Sometime ago, some drunken Somali teenage girls brutally attacked a stranger on the street after getting themselves drunk. They attacked her whlle chanting epithets like "Kill the white slag" and other racial slurs that would add a lot of length and severity to a criminal sentance if the perps were white and Christian. In this case however the judge let them off with a 6 month suspended sentence and no hate crimes charges.

Apparently, "Kill the white slag" is not a racist remark.

The judge's reasoning? The girls were Muslim and therefore, forbidden to drink alcohol and therefore, must have been unaccustomed to their effects and so had to be found not guilty as they were not under their own control.

A quick look at their photographs at the Daily Mail however, and you know these were not religious Muslims and may well have considerable experience with the effects of alcohol. So even the fully unacceptable reasoning of a British judge does not apply in this case, even if it was an acceptable form of deniability of agency. 

I wonder had the actual victim, the girl beaten in the street, if she had managed to damage them in defense, would the judge have said that her loss of control was due to her lack of experience in being gang beat by strangers and so she can be forgiven? 

In days where victims were victims and attackers were attackers, yes. Today I think the bookies lean the other way.

Then there are multiple examples of people doing actual jail time for mistreating a book. But only if that book happens to be a koran.


A couple nearly at random:

From 2011. A British soldier is jailed for burning a Koran. 

OK. He should have faced an ASBO (British misdemeanor of Anti Social Behaviour Order given to small scale thefts and graffiti and so on) for stealing the book. He should not have done that. But jail for burning it was the crime he was sentenced for.

19 year old jailed in 2014 for damaging the book which was his own property

 British law seems to condone bigamy in contradiction to laws which are obviously older than Henry VIII

In fact, in England today, it seems you can even be forgiven a speeding ticket if you are off to see your second wife.

(I'm not sure even Saudi Arabia is that sharia compliant)

Then there is the ancient British rule of jurisprudence that you have the right to face your accuser. 

While not fully implemented into law yet, the overturning of that basic tenet of Western law is about to be tossed out with the baby.

The London School of Economics segregated men and women in a non-religuous university function in direct contradiction of both UK law and university laws. This is an increasingly common phenomenon from the UK to Toronto Canada

There is a most distinct trend towards the abandonment of reason itself, as reason is the basis for Western jurisprudence as well as other systems of government in favour of sharia precepts. 

No small part of that is the dismemberment of Freedom of Speech in favour of hate-speech laws, usually applied only where people are critical of Islam, or university speech codes and so on ad infinitum.

That will be covered in another series of articles.



 Breitbart has a worthy update here:


 The ruling stipulates he must also feed the boy Halal food and assure him he is an ordinary Muslim boy.

The father has been threatened with loss of custody if he breaks the ban – but he has vowed to challenge the ruling, saying that his son is being brainwashed into Islam and that he doesn’t want him becoming a “dumb sheep”.





You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-03-28 15:55:18 -0400
Sympathizers/trolls/lefties/liberals/etc., I believe have some common traits: losers/queer/angry/boring/bullied in school/will do anything to be popular so they cling-onto bigger losers/retorts with “because” (no more explanation)/stalkers/effeminate/cowardly/robotic sheep/heathens. There’s more but I must go now.
commented 2016-03-28 14:23:55 -0400
This is just nuts. England is so screwed.
commented 2016-03-28 13:37:36 -0400
In a year’s time or less, this will be Canada also. Lieberal judiciary reinforced by the muslim convert in the PM’s chair favoring Sharia over Canadian or Common Law. Don’t count on the police. They are beholden and swear allegiance to the politicians.
commented 2016-03-28 13:15:19 -0400
Sean Penson could be the posterboy for birth control. You know “use condoms or you you cold have one of these…” There you go Sean, a whole new career. Get you out of your mother’ s basement…
commented 2016-03-28 11:01:57 -0400
I think the English judges have it wrong. I’m not sure but if they are going to enforce Sharia Law, shouldn’t all of these kids should be killed, one for being influenced by Christianity, and the girls for drinking alcohol?
commented 2016-03-28 10:20:52 -0400
Jamie MacMaster – as painful as free speech can be, I like these trolls coming here and spewing their lies and vile hatred. It confirms to those who may have had second thoughts or not, that they are appeasers, and in the end, once they have performed their usefulness to their evil cause, they in turn will be taken down by evil. It’s what they cheerlead for daily with their stupid taunts, and backward ways. One day the cheerleaders are going to get what they’ve asked for, in the way of chaos and evil. Be careful what you wish for trolls, because you will fall to the same evil, but no one will come to your rescue, because nobody will be left to defend you.
commented 2016-03-28 09:54:09 -0400
Response to Jamie Macmaster , I agree totally. I do not read any of the comments that in particular the two idiots make , which at the least are illogical and ill informed or really (as you say) direct attempts to provoke people into responding to rubbish.
People should make their own comments , agree or disagree with the subject matter presented and refrain from from giving these people “a voice”. A voice is only valid when it is aknowledged , and their voices are superfluous , banal and inane and do not deserve any attention whatsoever.
commented 2016-03-28 08:50:21 -0400
Look folks, here’s a bit of advice about the little dinks/trolls/twerps.

If you don’t respond to their blatantly obvious provocations, they will eventually go find another place that gives them their jollies. Seriously, why do you keep giving them their little chubbies? You’re just like their centerfolds.
commented 2016-03-28 08:40:00 -0400
Britain: a stupid little country – what Canada wants to be when it grows up.
commented 2016-03-28 04:48:38 -0400
Drew, you’re so insulting for a gas bar bohunk, aren’t you? Harper’s gone, as there is no one to stop your precious little country from Putin, anymore
commented 2016-03-28 01:10:26 -0400
Sean obviously does not know any world history, but of course that will surprise no one as he is pretty much brain dead from all those gerbils he has went through.
commented 2016-03-27 21:42:34 -0400
Sean Penson commented 25 mins ago
“Bravo Zulu, Well, it’s about time that white males begin to pay, "

Eh you POS get that wallet of yours out and start paying. Many of us white males have paid extreme amounts to you useless welfare types – and men like Bravo paid much in blood and life so shit-heads like you can spout your stupidity – yet you don’t learn.
Come to my house for coffee -I’ll give you a very quick course – educating you – how absolutely sick and tired of us white males being blamed for every mishap of society – when in fact it is useless phucktards like you who usurp everyone’s’ wealth. I guarantee you an education!
commented 2016-03-27 21:28:46 -0400
Sean Penson,
Are you a citizen of this country or are you some kind of plant from another country.

To think that this type of behaviour is acceptable anywhere in a civilized society is beyond belief.

The Muslims are not a minority and they have not been subjugated for centuries. On the contrary, they have been subjugating their fellow citizens and the people in their neighbouring countries for centuries.

Get a life. Even if they were subjugated for all that time, it is no reason to continue carrying out the atrocities they are responsible for today.
commented 2016-03-27 21:27:32 -0400
Decent common folks around the world need to join in FORCE against this Soros lead curse on humanity! Better listen up TruDope – you Libtards thought you have all guns in Canada registered? Well think again you lunatic POS! You arm the Islamists – all the while thinking you’ll disarm decent Canadians? – well many of us are direct ancestors of those who fought the fascist devils in Europe – your Lieberal lies didn’t convince a whole lot more of us than you think.
Good luck to all of the decent common peoples around the world and especially to those in Germany!
Yes we are REBELS – our resolve is greater than those welfare refugees!
commented 2016-03-27 21:10:00 -0400
Bravo Zulu, Well, it’s about time that white males begin to pay, with all the damage done throughout world history. How dare anyone get upset when the tides have turned. It’s about time that racial, religious, and sexual minorities start to flex some power.
commented 2016-03-27 20:23:32 -0400
Your Comment, There is no justice system � there is only a legal system.

Yes a legal system controlled by the far left and dancing the UN Tango.

Cameron, another puppet who like Trudeau jumps to the madness of Marxism, allows the UK Judicial system to make their own rules and they all favor Islam.
There is a Referendum due on June 23rd, in the UK. They are voting on getting out of the EU, Cameron, who wants to stay in, did not realize the strength of Britain First, UKIP and the BNP. According to the latest Polls, the out or BREXIT vote is way ahead.

If the UK dose leave the EU it will cause chaos amongst the remaining members and more of them will follow the UKs example. This in turn will create waves in the UN. The whole UN EU system will become disorganized.. This in turn will throw a big wrench into Little Justin’s plans, his strings will not be pulled when they need to be and Justin will go into Panic Attacks, resulting in Canada’s Justice System to revert to normality.

A lot of If’s! So let us Pray to God or perhaps Prey on Trudeau.
commented 2016-03-27 20:11:45 -0400
Ndp Sucks commented 3 hours ago
“To All Trolls (Especially Ronny Christensen). FUCK OFF! "

Too late NDP Sucks: – David Tremblay made it in under the wire! Just an Islamist apologist!!..and Anti-Semitic.
commented 2016-03-27 17:42:12 -0400
the time to purge draws near
commented 2016-03-27 17:25:39 -0400
Sorry David, it is still stupid.
commented 2016-03-27 16:50:45 -0400
I don’t suppose anyone has considered the possibilities that there is much more to this story than you were told here. The judge granted the mothers request because the child only lives with the father occasionally. The judges decision had nothing to do with what religion these people are. The simple google search I did to find the source article also listed another recent case where a judge in England ordered a father to go with his child to church at christmas in England and he is not a member of that church. The horror of it all. But wait it was not a headline on this site because the church in question was catholic!!!
commented 2016-03-27 16:49:02 -0400
To All Trolls (Especially Ronny Christensen).
commented 2016-03-27 15:41:21 -0400
Give it about 5 years and there is going to be a flood of white Europeans trying to immigrate here.
Stand at the back of the line suckers! We don’t want civilised people, we want illiterate misogynists
Comrade justin bin pierre won’t let you in.
commented 2016-03-27 15:08:24 -0400
I would simply pack up and leave.

The woman is damaged goods – no islamic will have her now except as a whore.

There is no justice system – there is only a legal system.

You might think on what I just wrote.


There is no such thing as equality.

Everything trumps the white man’s religion and culture.

commented 2016-03-27 14:02:15 -0400
I don’t know why this would come as a shock to us. Any nation with an official multicultural policy in enforcement, will be accommodating cultural subgroups according to a intervention codex based in their perceived natural inequities with the dominant culture or majority.

In Canada group inequity before the law was codified and entrenched in our Charter. If you want to see the inherent conflict in terms this has created read section 15(1) then see how that statement is modified/nulified by subsection 15(2) -

" Equality Rights, “Marginal note: Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law”

“15. (1) – Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”
  • Then this contradiction:

“Affirmative action programs 15(2) – Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”

Huh? We’re all equal under law except these groups deemed to be “disadvantaged” by their race, religion ethnicity etc. – they get to be treated differently under law to “ameliorate” the conditions of their disadvantage. "What’s up with that?

Well aside from being the most racially bigoted supremacist statement ever enshrined in law (law presuming a person’s race disadvantages them) it places the purpose of the law in conflict with stated purpose. We have seen how judicial activism has interpreted this as being their opportunity to run a multi-tiered justice system with different levels of compliance with the law ascribed to different identifiable groups.

In this case we seek Brit mulitiered justice assuming the role of a Sharia tribunal for those it deems to need it – at best this is freakish presumption by the jurocrats and at worst a rejection of the 800 year old western legal philosophy of universal equity/justice.