October 19, 2017

Justin’s “quota system” feminism fosters culture of sexism

David MenziesMission Specialist


With the myriad challenges facing our great Dominion today, Justin Trudeau took the time to pen an essay for Marie Claire magazine on why he’s a feminist and why it’s a good idea for families to raise boys as feminists.

Justin writes:

“All of us benefit when women and girls have the same opportunities as men and boys – and it’s on all of us to make that a reality. Our sons have the power and the responsibility to change our culture of sexism.”

But hang on: does this mean our self-described feminist PM was guilty of sexism in 2015 when he purposely appointed a cabinet with an equal number of male and female MPs?

Because such a move says more about virtue signalling and less about being an advocate for true equality.

What if some female MPs are now cabinet ministers solely due to their sex rather than merit, or if there’s an abundance of female talent in the Liberal ranks but he’s limiting them to JUST 50 per cent of cabinet posts?

Our feminist PM has provided yet another example of how feminist ideals can hinder rather than help the cause of women.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-10-20 21:56:56 -0400
- Trudeau is more effeminate than feminist. He wants people to raise their sons as feminists so he can pretend to be a man.
commented 2017-10-20 02:28:03 -0400
The diverse Liberal party chose another White Guy form Quebec as their leader and they are telling others to be more diverse. LMAO!
commented 2017-10-20 02:27:11 -0400
So what if there just aren’t that many women interested in certain jobs? Do you just leave the positions unfilled?
commented 2017-10-19 22:30:04 -0400
Trudeau boasts that he is a feminist because it resonates with many uninformed voters. It makes for good hip talk while smoking joints and drinking beers. But he is not a feminist. His actions prove it.
Trudeau is not a leader of people. Most recent example is his quote, “I’ll take that”, when stepping up to the mic in front on Bill Morneau in a media scrum. Where also stated, “it’s not often you get to talk to the PM”
He has no clue when it comes to finances and taxes. Absolutely no clue.
He is not a planner. He has no clue of the consequences when making promises before conducting any due diligence.
He simply has no expertise in anything
So what is he?
He is a fool being fooled by a fool named Gerald Butts and he spends his waking hours trying to fool others. And he’s actually done a decent job of that. Fooling fools, that is.
commented 2017-10-19 20:52:04 -0400
The islamic prime minister is simply a POS.
commented 2017-10-19 16:02:43 -0400
Mike Bell, great post.

When I hear “quota system” I immediately think of the Milk Marketing Board of Ontario!

Gender quotas are bound to fail, it’s a ridiculous policy, and, the most qualified person for job is a better rationale.
commented 2017-10-19 13:41:03 -0400
Friedland, aka The Woman In Red, Climate Barbie, and our wonderful and useless “Afghani” minister who became a citizen with a lie: how the heck did they become ministers? It wasn’t their competence; it was what they had between their legs. If men were this incompetent, they either wouldn’t become a minister or would be dropped ASAP. But then again, Baby Doc is pretty much an incompetent fool, so he wouldn’t know the difference.

Isn’t it time our lisping effeminate feminist PM admitted what he is and come out of the closet? I would give him more respect if he would be honest with us, but since he won’t, I have no respect for him.
commented 2017-10-19 13:33:36 -0400
It’s all about ensuring “equality of outcome”, i.e., communism.

Except that by now it’s “group-based”.

It doesn’t make sense that the cabinet would be 50% women when the percentage of women among MPs is much lower. It stands to reason that there will consequently be more duds among the female cabinet members.

Pick people on talent/ability. That’s it.

Of course, now they’ll want to introduce quotas on MPs.
Which will actually make elections NON-democratic, if you think about it…
commented 2017-10-19 11:15:32 -0400
William Elder, thanks for the link.

What else shall we call that cologne.. “Trou d’Eau” ?

Or maybe “Eau de Trou de Cul” (‘Asshole’, literally).
commented 2017-10-19 11:04:38 -0400
Iain Foulds, agreed. Affirmative action is an insult to competent women. Most of Justin’s cabinet should be embarrassed. Gawd knows we’re embarrassed for them. The conservatives however have some impressive women working for the party, who clearly obtained their positions through their smarts.
If their are any in the harem Justin has gathered together for show, I have missed them.
commented 2017-10-19 10:18:05 -0400
Perturbation is defined as a deviation of a system, moving object, or process from its regular or normal state of path, caused by an outside influence. Trudeau is the outside influence and certainly his quota system to establish his ideas on diversity , gender equality and feminism are a perturbation of the normal human condition.
If it is mandatory to have 50% of Cabinet Ministers female, then why would it not be mandatory to only have female candidates allowed to run in various ridings to ensure an even representation in the House of Commons? If Trudeau’s method is deemed logical,. then the logic path would require that everything be based on quotas, say 50 % of stock car drivers would have to be female for example, irrespective of their proficiency in driving.
Women can succeed and excel at almost any endeavor , but that has to be based on merit just like it is for men.
I have voted for and elected two woman to Parliament in succession. Not because they were woman but because they were hands down the best candidates. I don’t know anyone personally that would vote against a candidate based on gender.
Unfortunately when you elevate unqualified people to positions beyond their capabilities , it leads to disaster and it leads to resentment.
commented 2017-10-19 10:02:10 -0400
The word, feminist, is another undefined regressive left term just like the word, islamophobia. What do these words actually mean? They mean what the regressive left say they mean as the spirit moves at any given moment.

This can be extended to the word, racism. The regressive left has made this a meaningless term by always shifting the definition. The absurd example Singh accusing the CBC, of all organizations, of being racist because Milewski questioned him about Air India.

When the regressive left starts to speak, go listen to an infant for better discourse instead. There is attempted meaning from the infant.
commented 2017-10-19 09:52:41 -0400
Nobody cares what sex anyone is. We only care about getting competent people in the positions who can do the job well.
commented 2017-10-19 09:44:56 -0400
Fake feminism.
Fake equality.
Fake leadership.

Throwing one identifiable group under the bus to promote another is never equality. It’s bullshit.
commented 2017-10-19 09:44:50 -0400
Don’t know about the fostering sexism part, but it’s certainly symptomatic of a culture of silliness and stupidity.
commented 2017-10-19 09:42:34 -0400
Who can understand Trudeau. He’s a man that makes no sense.
commented 2017-10-19 09:10:34 -0400
… Woman should be fighting against quota systems.
… What an embarrassment to know that you received your job because of your gender. How 100% condescending.