With the myriad challenges facing our great Dominion today, Justin Trudeau took the time to pen an essay for Marie Claire magazine on why he’s a feminist and why it’s a good idea for families to raise boys as feminists.
Justin writes:
“All of us benefit when women and girls have the same opportunities as men and boys – and it’s on all of us to make that a reality. Our sons have the power and the responsibility to change our culture of sexism.”
But hang on: does this mean our self-described feminist PM was guilty of sexism in 2015 when he purposely appointed a cabinet with an equal number of male and female MPs?
Because such a move says more about virtue signalling and less about being an advocate for true equality.
What if some female MPs are now cabinet ministers solely due to their sex rather than merit, or if there’s an abundance of female talent in the Liberal ranks but he’s limiting them to JUST 50 per cent of cabinet posts?
Our feminist PM has provided yet another example of how feminist ideals can hinder rather than help the cause of women.
Typical virtual signalling. Black Pigeon Speaks about Canada destroying itself through virtue signalling of those in power.
Trudeau is not a leader of people. Most recent example is his quote, “I’ll take that”, when stepping up to the mic in front on Bill Morneau in a media scrum. Where also stated, “it’s not often you get to talk to the PM”
He has no clue when it comes to finances and taxes. Absolutely no clue.
He is not a planner. He has no clue of the consequences when making promises before conducting any due diligence.
He simply has no expertise in anything
So what is he?
He is a fool being fooled by a fool named Gerald Butts and he spends his waking hours trying to fool others. And he’s actually done a decent job of that. Fooling fools, that is.
When I hear “quota system” I immediately think of the Milk Marketing Board of Ontario!
Gender quotas are bound to fail, it’s a ridiculous policy, and, the most qualified person for job is a better rationale.
Isn’t it time our lisping effeminate feminist PM admitted what he is and come out of the closet? I would give him more respect if he would be honest with us, but since he won’t, I have no respect for him.
Except that by now it’s “group-based”.
It doesn’t make sense that the cabinet would be 50% women when the percentage of women among MPs is much lower. It stands to reason that there will consequently be more duds among the female cabinet members.
Pick people on talent/ability. That’s it.
Of course, now they’ll want to introduce quotas on MPs.
Which will actually make elections NON-democratic, if you think about it…
What else shall we call that cologne.. “Trou d’Eau” ?
Or maybe “Eau de Trou de Cul” (‘Asshole’, literally).
If their are any in the harem Justin has gathered together for show, I have missed them.
Forgive me. I have just discovered Political Cowboy.
Justin, don’t let the cowboy hat trigger you, Gerald is loyal to only you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WWd0LkDJpQ
Man Rompers?!? Just say no
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pcd4WNiB6cc
Gender Inequality
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGHKswpVoAADxGN.jpg
If it is mandatory to have 50% of Cabinet Ministers female, then why would it not be mandatory to only have female candidates allowed to run in various ridings to ensure an even representation in the House of Commons? If Trudeau’s method is deemed logical,. then the logic path would require that everything be based on quotas, say 50 % of stock car drivers would have to be female for example, irrespective of their proficiency in driving.
Women can succeed and excel at almost any endeavor , but that has to be based on merit just like it is for men.
I have voted for and elected two woman to Parliament in succession. Not because they were woman but because they were hands down the best candidates. I don’t know anyone personally that would vote against a candidate based on gender.
Unfortunately when you elevate unqualified people to positions beyond their capabilities , it leads to disaster and it leads to resentment.
This can be extended to the word, racism. The regressive left has made this a meaningless term by always shifting the definition. The absurd example Singh accusing the CBC, of all organizations, of being racist because Milewski questioned him about Air India.
When the regressive left starts to speak, go listen to an infant for better discourse instead. There is attempted meaning from the infant.
Fake equality.
Fake leadership.
Throwing one identifiable group under the bus to promote another is never equality. It’s bullshit.
… What an embarrassment to know that you received your job because of your gender. How 100% condescending.