April 13, 2015

Kathleen Wynne calls parents 'homophobic', blames Federal Conservatives over opposition to her radical sex-ed curriculum

Brian LilleyArchive

Kathleen Wynne's radical sex-ed curriculum has concerned parents protesting.

Yet according to Kathleen Wynne, these parents are 'homophobic'.

That's right. According to her, if you don't think 8-year-olds should be learning about masturbation, you're 'homophobic'.

She's even going as far to blame Stephen Harper and the federal Conservatives for opposition to her curriculum.

Smearing her opponents is just a disgusting act.

To top it all off, she's continuing to deny pedophile Ben Levin's involvement.

JOIN TheRebel.media for more news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

READ Brian Lilley's book CBC Exposed -- it's been called "the political book of the year"

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-04-25 09:00:38 -0400
This is pretty bad writing. What she said was that part of what is motivating some protestors is homophobia, and thats clearly true. It was a colleague of hers who suggested MacNaughton was being homophobic. There is no lack of mud to throw at the liberals and Wynn, when you make stuff up it just makes you look bad. As for a couple of the comments. I think just a cursory look at the pornographic ads that show up on a search engine let alone the porn out there is PRECISELY the reason to be teaching sex ed in school. But maybe thats the real issue, its probably a group of guys out there who really want to make sure women learn about sex from porn movies. Hey girls, its just a fun thing to do to bang six guys in a night, everybody is doing it, just look how happy those girls in the movies are!
commented 2015-04-14 20:09:00 -0400
I question the need to teach kids anything beyond basic naming of anatomy, and during the school year before age of consent, teaching about safe sex.

Masturbation? I don’t know about anyone here, but I figured this out on my own, around the time my OWN hormones started kicking at me, and NOT someone else. So why the sudden need to teach masturbation?

With the internet content out there these days, again, aside from ensuring we teach safe sex, and more or less just before age of consent, ANYONE wanting to learn about “the nasty” to try and do it, (preferably with someone they like and with consent) can so easily find images and videos that suit their sexual preferences, that will give them sometimes more than a general idea of what gets done.

Now after the age of consent, go ahead and teach some more about reproduction, but still leave individual preferences out of it, and if you want a “gender studies” course, aside from reminding people to be accepting of each others preferences and boundaries, (for all you gays trying to “turn” the straits, because like it or not, it is disrespectful!) which should likely be taught to an extent, you can go ahead and have your debates in a “gender studies” class, that should be an optional, not mandatory, towards the end of high school, or even after high school in the social sciences divisions.

Keep political ideologies for those able to actually vote, and leave our kids out of it.
commented 2015-04-14 19:50:20 -0400
“No means no” unless you’re Kathleen Wynne.
commented 2015-04-14 13:38:27 -0400
DAN MANCUSO your comment “I predict that the Wynn/Levin recruitment-course for the normalization of inter-generational sex, AKA pedophilia and it’s establishment as a sexual orientation” is not far off the mark.
Modern comprehensive sexuality education programs, such as that introduced in Ontario by Kathleen Wynne, are mostly based on fraudulent ‘science’ conducted by Alfred Kinsey purporting to show that children are sexual from birth and sexual behavior of all kinds are healthy and normal for children, adolescents, and adults.
The founder of the Kinsey Institute, Alfred Kinsey, co-authored, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female and Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Both publications are currently in print and widely available. Regarding pedophilia, in the Female volume, Kinsey writes:
“It is difficult to understand why a child, except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched, or disturbed at seeing the genitalia of other persons, or disturbed at even more specific sexual contacts… Adult contacts…are not likely to do the child any appreciable harm if the child’s parents do not become disturbed.”
Note how, in Kinsey’s view, the parents are the source of the problem; no doubt explaining the limited to no consultation Wynne conducted with parents.
In his own words, Alfred Kinsey has made claims that child sexuality, adult-child sex, and bestiality are simply normal expressions of human sexuality. These claims have changed the perceptions of human sexuality. Further still, Kinsey’s claims have lent credence to the efforts of pedophiles, bigamists, and zoosexuals seeking acceptance of their “sexual orientation.” .
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States. At its web site, it has a page devoted to Kinsey
Note that NAMBLA takes justification for its actions in the research produced by Alfred Kinsey, by making citations to quotes in books published by Kinsey and co-workers, including the following:
“When children are constantly warned by parents and teachers against contacts with adults, and when they receive no explanation of the exact nature of the contacts, they are ready to become hysterical as soon as any older person approaches, or stops and speaks to them in the street, or fondles them, or proposes to do something for them, even though the adult may have had no sexual objective in mind. Some of the more experienced students of juvenile problems have come to believe that the emotional reactions of the parents, police officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact, may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves. The current hysteria over sex offenders may very well have serious effects on the ability of many of these children to work out sexual adjustments some years later…” – Alfred Kinsey, W. Pomeroy, C. Martin, and P. Gephard, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953).
Understanding the history of Alfred Kinsey is critical to understanding the harm his sexual ideologies have done and continue to do. While your rage of frustration is understandable, I would counsel against sending an angry email to Wynne, but rather help others to understand the scourge of Kinsey’s legacy.
commented 2015-04-14 11:56:06 -0400
Could someone tell me If I’d ‘get into trouble’ if I sent the following message to Wynn’s constituency office?:
Kathleen Wynn
In response to your comment about, people who disagree with your degenerate ideas about sex-ed and that indoctrination being force-fed to our children, are all “homophobes”, I say:
Any time you think you’re man enough to call me a homophobe to my face you’re welcome to try you ugly dyke…because I wouldn’t send it if it got me into trouble.
commented 2015-04-14 11:08:58 -0400
I’d like to comment but I’m in a rage of frustration over the evil that is being forced on us at every turn by the ‘people’ we have apparently elected to represent us and in my rage the oxygen supply is cut off to my brain and I can’t think straight…
…Okay I’m on the deck…deep breaths…look at the sun glinting off the lake reflecting a cloudless blue sky…OK.

I predict that the Wynn/Levin recruitment-course for the normalization of inter-generational sex, AKA pedophilia and it’s establishment as a sexual orientation, rather than a criminal act – just like homosexuality was – will be in the Ontario schools come fall!
Unless THE PEOPLE actually go down to Queens Park with flaming torches and pitchforks and drag that criminal degenerate from her office, your children WILL all be subject to that pernicious indoctrination!
You had better claim your children now because the state wants them and they are taking them…
commented 2015-04-14 04:49:27 -0400
Wow … GREAT comments. I don’t need to add anything. You voted for her … someone commented … . Well – the Good News is – you can un-vote her.
commented 2015-04-13 21:00:47 -0400
My guess is, Bill, that she was already creepy. She just let it out for a little air.
commented 2015-04-13 20:37:16 -0400
Debased lesbian. Pray for your children. She is not the only one.
commented 2015-04-13 20:34:16 -0400
Straightophobia – didn’t take Wynn long to turn from insincere and bent to just plain creepy.
commented 2015-04-13 20:00:56 -0400
If this sex ed curriculum does not get stopped for this fall in the Ontario classroms, the other provinces will follow Ontario’s lead … so basically what I am saying is, “Ontario stop that damn perversion from reaching the classroom! We are depending upon you to do the right thing!”
commented 2015-04-13 19:50:43 -0400
This crazy b**ch needs to go! She will not be happy until she has completely destroyed Ontario and destroyed a generation of children! How can you push a curriculum put together by a child molester! God help everyone in Ontario!
commented 2015-04-13 17:36:32 -0400
The last straw before the National Advisory Council on Status of Women got defunded was that they were going through copies of HANSARD with a pink highlighter marking things said in parliament that they deemed “heterosexist” and “heterocentric”.
commented 2015-04-13 17:34:01 -0400
I have talked to several teachers who are not going to teach this new information. They say there was nothing wrong with the old sex ed. So it is not only some parents who are uncomfortable!
commented 2015-04-13 17:16:51 -0400
Whenever anyone disagrees with lgbt people they are immediately called homophobic. Nothing new or unique here. It’s just do as I say or want and who cares what you say. It’s their way of trying to shut people down. People are fed up with this loose lipped catch all “poor me, nobody loves me” childish phrase.
Listen here Ms or Mr Kathleen Wynne, your perverted sex ed proposal for innocent Ontario children better be shut down before September rolls around or your sickening ass and the Ontario government is going to be slapped with a class action law suit for child pornography and child abuse. Think it’s not possible, think again. What, did I hear you say, I’m homophobic? Give it a rest. If you can’t come up with anything better than that, you’ve already lost this argument hands down.
commented 2015-04-13 16:58:27 -0400
I did not think Wynne could get any lower than the snakes belly she resides at now. The main stream media needs to take these politicians to task like they do the conservatives. Not one conservative would be able to make a comment like that without the CBC/CTV coming out in full force until someone got fired for making such a defamatory statement like that. Liberals say it and nothing is done by the media, but then again the Liberals are mentally handicapped and need protection, maybe that’s how the main stream media sees it. If I were Harper I would sue Wynne, just like she has sued Hudak and MacLeod. That was a defamatory comment and Harper needs to call her on it, she needs to say “I am sorry” in the media, or face a lawsuit.
commented 2015-04-13 16:54:52 -0400
Calling parents homophobes shold bring in the votes hahahahahahhahaha…loser
commented 2015-04-13 16:51:52 -0400
Wynne calls Harper despicable? Wynne is despicable!!! Here’s my repost from the Benjamin Levin story:

Matthew 18:6 “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”,

Mark 9:42 “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea”,

Luke 17:2 “It would be better for them to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than to cause one of these little ones to stumble”

That’s all seems pretty clear to me. I wouldn’t want to be in either Benjamin Levin’s shoes or Kathleen Wynne’s shoes when they stand before God, or anyone else who would advance this perverse hedonistic indoctrination of children. And one day they will stand before God, make no mistake about it. With all due respect to any of our atheist friends who may be reading this post, this sex ed agenda is pure satanic.
commented 2015-04-13 16:47:08 -0400
If we were a homophobic province would a gay premier get a majority, what an idiot
commented 2015-04-13 16:15:35 -0400
i am amazed cbc finally (4.30am) put a link on about benjamin levin……of course no comments allowed.
commented 2015-04-13 16:13:44 -0400
Anonymous – good one!
commented 2015-04-13 16:12:41 -0400
Pat Anjali – I too oppose Wynne but as I am sure you want to be accurate, please note she has three children and three grandchildren. http://news.ontario.ca/profiles/en/kathleen-wynne

We cannot blame her attitudes on being too selfish or unfortunate enough to have no family.
commented 2015-04-13 16:08:35 -0400
finally the muslims protest something…
commented 2015-04-13 16:08:19 -0400
I hate to be too politically cynical but what would it have cost Wynne’s government to collect data from all parents that chose to participate in a detailed online survey about the sex-ed curriculum? It’s not like they would have had to pay the results any heed. They could even have not scored them and just told the public the results overwhelmingly support the sex-ed curriculum. If anyone asked for Freedom of Information access to the raw data, her government could just have said, oops, some low-level bureaucrat deleted it, sorry. It would have been just one more lie.

Doing that would have given parents the feeling they’d been consulted. Even if the government still ignored parent views as they do now. But because of what appears to be a huge mix of excess arrogance and laziness, Wynne has made a lot of enemies.

Wynne may be right that the Conservatives may use this issue to influence some ridings. And why not? Wynne used Trudeau to influence her re-election, so why shouldn’t the federal Conservatives do the same to win another majority? Maybe they will use this classic photo of Trudeau, Wynne and Levin sitting together at the Toronto Pride Festival: https://bcblue.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/levin-trudeau-wynne.jpg
commented 2015-04-13 16:05:29 -0400
Do LGBTQ folks have a different perspective than parents? I think I might if I was LGBTQ or even if I was just single. You would think our school curriculum would reflect the perspective of those who produce the students. Is Wynne heterophobic?
commented 2015-04-13 15:56:19 -0400
Greig and Egil – I live in Ontario and voted Conservative. Sorry you are wrong. Listen, though, soon enough you may have a new province to slur with fault as some polls show that in Alberta the NDP is just two points behind Wild Rose and gaining in Calgary.
commented 2015-04-13 15:51:18 -0400
Well chatty Kathy , you are a “CHRIST-A-PHOBE” . I think a lot of people are sick of getting this “gay rights agenda” rammed down our throat. How about a new term " momdadaphobe" . Social engineers like you Kathy seak to replace the family unit , especially the traditional judeo-christian traditional family unit , declaring moms and dads unfit to raise their children according to their values which are not in tune with your ideas of what sexuality should be. Most of us are baby boomers and are familiar with the lyric “teacher, leave them kids alone”. So Kathy , LEAVE THEM KIDS ALONE. Let parents raise their kids the way they want and leave your gay agenda at your home.
commented 2015-04-13 15:40:21 -0400
The job of government should be to keep pedophiles off the streets and out of from the ministry of education. Conservatives are not homophobes. We want our children to be able to play in their own neighbourhoods without the fear of being molested. Take the bad guys off the streets for a long, long time. If Ms Wynne keeps confusing homophobia with pedophilia maybe she has a problem. Just asking?
commented 2015-04-13 15:12:09 -0400
Gotta agree, Egil. No one to blame but themselves. Yeah, the party of the tolerant and inclusive, once again showcasing they are the farthest thing from it. Count on Wynne’s hetro-phobic agenda and cap and trade carbon tax being forced upon all of us should the Progs hand Justeen the reins. Is it to early to put one’s name on the list for medicinal marijuana and free heroin?
commented 2015-04-13 15:07:30 -0400
An excellent example of how a minority is attempting to control and muffle the majority by name calling and smearing (use of the word “homophobic”). It shows they are on a social engineering agenda.