March 06, 2019

EXCLUSIVE: Kent Hehr “proud” of Jody Wilson-Raybould, believes testimony to be true

Keean BexteRebel Contributor

While leaving an SNC-Lavalin distraction stunt orchestrated by the Liberals on the taxpayer’s dime Calgary, I asked Kent Hehr, Liberal Member of Parliament for Calgary-Centre, some questions.

Even though his staffer quickly jumped into action to make sure The Rebel wasn’t able to ask Hehr any questions, I managed to ask him if he thought Wilson-Raybould told the truth in her testimony.

His answer was surprising.

What was even more surprising was that even though his staffer pleaded for me to not ask his boss any questions, Kent Hehr told me he is proud to be a Liberal member with Jody Wilson-Raybould.

Statements like this are similar to those made by Dr. Jane Philpott, the former President of the Treasury Board, who stepped down from the Trudeau Cabinet to side with Wilson-Raybould.

Perhaps Kent has looked at his personal electability in October, and like Philpott, decided distancing himself from Trudeau is the best path forward.

As the sole Liberal MP in Calgary, maybe Hehr has finally realized that Trudeau will be more of a hindrance than a help when election day rolls around.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2019-03-07 06:18:42 -0500
The real lie in all of this (and the Liberals are lying to themselves if they believe it) is the notion that 9000 people in Quebec would feel compelled to not vote Liberal if “justice were served though the Heavens may fall”…….who would they vote for to get their jobs back? Who could they have voted for in the hope of another outcome?

The Liberals may believe this lie they are telling themselves based on their ivory tower academic elitism and perception of the masses as “knuckle dragging Neanderthals” and who would vote against them purely in a fit of pique.

If there WAS real heartfelt concern about the guys who climb the ladders up inside the ceiling tiles in government buildings to fix the HVAC, SNC LAVALIN is a spoon in a coffee cup…it will not leave a hole if it is removed….the HVAC technician will be hired by someone else.

Looking at the management org charts of who manages SNC LAVALIN (and what other things those people manage) reveals the REAL concerns of Justin Trudeau and Gerald Butts.
commented 2019-03-07 06:05:08 -0500
Under the Canada Evidence Act you are not obliged to swear an oath on the Bible….nor should you be…

Matthew 5:34-37 King James Version (KJV)

34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne:

35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.

36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

Consciencious objection by Christians on the basis of that scripture has been recognized for more than half a century.

More currently objection on the basis of not being a christian is also recognized….as it should be.

Bottom line…..what the court is demanding is far beyond the scope of it’s jurisdiction . No officer of the court is duely ordained as clergy.
commented 2019-03-06 20:02:29 -0500
The important thing is the significant majority of Canadians believe Sings Like a Bird. Looks like Junior may be taking that long walk in the snow any time now.
commented 2019-03-06 20:02:09 -0500
Liza,never mind the backsides walking out the door, better to see the floor drop out from under the whole bloody lot of them, especially if they have nooses around their necks.
commented 2019-03-06 19:57:18 -0500
Hehr was on talking points. He was thrown under the bus by the Kokanee Groper. He did not have the integrity that three liberals showed in the last four weeks to stand up to bullying. It must be embarrassing for him.
commented 2019-03-06 19:31:04 -0500
Liberal MP’s talking to the Rebel? What is this?
As far as liberals are concerned they all give everyone the ‘right’ to experience the truth differently, so what Kent was really saying was he believed, she believed what she was saying and nothing more. Freeland basically said the same thing. In the liberals post truth world, you get to never be held to what you say or do.

Two other guys who suffer badly from that post truth logic are Wernick and Butts. What a pathetic show from both of them today. Neither of them have any business in positions of power with anything to do with the government of Canada. I hope we see their backsides going out the door for the last time real soon.
commented 2019-03-06 19:02:18 -0500
I thought the jab about not taking “no” was the best part of the interview. Although it really only applies to the Kent Hehr groping affair and not to Jody’s vindictive rampage.

When exactly did Jody say “no”? Certainly not September 16 because SHE continued to solicit advice after that. She never informed anyone in writing that she deemed her opinion to be final. This only came out post demotion.

When is an AG’s opinion on such matters final and irreversible? At the final verdict of the proceeding; which in this instance is a long way away.

In short, the canard that Jody had made and clearly communicated a final decree is a lie she made up that the mainstream rebel repeats.
commented 2019-03-06 18:13:37 -0500
95 days with no signs of a hammer falling.
commented 2019-03-06 18:10:00 -0500
Good scoop on Hehr’s support of JWR.
But to be critical for a moment: the provocative and silly question regarding Liberals taking the word “no” from women, well, that’s just not professional. If you want to ask particular details about his or another case, that’s fair, respectable and responsible. MSM reporters are guilty of the same tactic, especially against Scheer, but try to be better than them.
IMHO