June 22, 2015

Pink triangles in math class: LifeSite sued by school board after exposing LGBT lesson plans

Brian LilleyArchive

I talked to John-Henry Weston, the editor-in-chief of LifeSite.com, which is being sued over its coverage of an LGBT-themed teachers' conference.

Their reporter's audio from the event captured a self-described lesbian teacher describing "how they teach children as young as Grade Four about same-sex marriage, LGBT rights and homosexuality, basically."

The teachers explicitly explained how they taught these lessons as part of "social justice math."

When teaching geometry, for example, one teacher said she used pink triangles, a Gay Pride symbol.

Attendees also reportedly talked and laughed about how they hide their agenda from concerned parents.

The Peel District School Board has now sent a cease and desist letter to LifeSite, telling them to remove this "hateful" material.

To learn more about this lawsuit, CLICK HERE to read the full statement of claim sent by the Peel District School Board to LifeSite News.

JOIN TheRebel.media for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

READ Brian Lilley's book CBC Exposed -- it's been called "the political book of the year.”

Ontario’s sex-ed curriculum sexualizes young children, undermines parental authority and imposes the government's morality on every Ontario family.
SIGN THE PETITION at ProtectOurKids.ca

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-06-24 20:01:33 -0400
I used to periodically stand outside in the hall of my kids classrooms, without the teacher knowing. I probably did it once a month, more if I had a concern. Parents need to be more plugged in, and I don’t mean the PTA. That was 20 years ago. These days I wouldn’t even try to put my kids into the Public school system.

This lawsuit has to be thrown out, if it is not, we are all in big trouble. I really think enrolment numbers will start reflecting the dissatisfaction of parents, as was pointed out, parents are only going to accept so much intrusion, and this has gone way over the line.
commented 2015-06-24 14:02:06 -0400
How things have changed . When I attended school as a child in Ontario we began our day with reading the Lord’s Prayer followed by God Save the Queen and Oh Canada.
We learned how Canada came to be through the development of the fur trade and subsequent European settlement to our shores.
I recall feeling great pride in the achievements of our forefathers . Now we have over paid teachers attempting to distroy all that we have accomplished . These people are not progressives they are destroyers and their arrogance knows no limits. Sex "education"is only one avenue used by teachers to undermine our Western values. They actively promote climate change crap and ridicule Christian beliefs. No more Christmas concerts etc.
What angers me the most is their belief that they know better than parents,therefore they are entitled to be duplicitous in their approach,sneaking in their " enlightened "views on morality. Shame on them.
commented 2015-06-23 20:32:23 -0400
I llike both The Rebel and Lifesitenews a lot. They should consider a merger.
commented 2015-06-23 13:14:27 -0400
Thank you, Pete!
commented 2015-06-23 11:04:05 -0400
I absolutely not condone the killing of homosexuals because they are homosexuals, Joan. If children are involved however…
What consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes is their own business, it’s between them and God.
It’s when the homosexuals bring that aesthetically offensive mental disorder out into the public, push it into my face and try to change – read destroy – my country and impose a ‘legal’ demand that I give them approval for their acting out of this mental disorder called homosexuality, or when their recruiters insinuate themselves and their homosexual agenda
into the public schools to condition and indoctrinate a new generation of unwilling converts to the homosexual agenda, or when our ‘government’ willingly goes along with, or caves in to the extortion of the big club of political correctness, that I put on my fightin’ boots.
The homosexuals and the rest of the LGTBQRST freak-show have been pushing the envelope of tolerance of the 97 to 99 % of people who are normal – read heterosexual – the homosexuals don’t get they are being used as a wedge device to destroy Canada and leave us weak and divided, they also don’t understand that when the creepazoids who are manipulating and using the homosexuals, etc. are done with them, they will be the first to be thrown under the bus.
There will come a push back from the normal people. It will be ugly.
Cause and effect. You make a choice, you suffer the consequences of that choice. We all do.
That’s life…
commented 2015-06-23 11:03:46 -0400
“Social justice math”!? The seemingly benign-sounding, caring phrase “social justice” is code for a socialist agenda to impose its ideology:
Consider this excerpt from a post at the Communist Party of Canada’s web site:
“This year, a new solidarity is forming across Canada…This new solidarity reaches outward to recruit allies beyond the old labour solidarity which created it, making the unity of organized labour, social justice movements and the public a key ingredient in the formula for success”.
commented 2015-06-23 10:07:38 -0400
There is some misinformation being spread in this article.
1. Disagreeing with teaching the sexualization of children at such a young age is not hating gays.
2. A Christian hates the sin of homosexuality, but loves the person. That is one of the biggest misunderstood concepts by those that are not Christians.
commented 2015-06-23 10:03:19 -0400
Dan Mancuso – Can you please clarify? In western societies everywhere are many thousands of people who support ISIS ideology, and many more who support Muslim Brotherhood ideals. So when you say it is war between hetero- and homosexuals, you do not mean to endorse this, right?

commented 2015-06-23 09:48:59 -0400
Where is the link to the story Lifesite.com is being sued for? Pretty hard to judge without it.

Since when is pink a homosexual colour? Isn’t it traditionally a girl colour? Girl doesn’t mean gay. Even if a man wears a pink tie, it doesn’t make him gay. I thought gay colours were the rainbow.

Listen. Teachers have always used current culture in applied math. Mohammud prays five times a day. He has to attend a class in gender equity at 12:10 every day. He has a class in Catholic studies from 11:00 to 11:45. How fast must he walk to the prayer room to be able to also eat lunch?

I’d like to see the original story lifesite is being sued over. If it quoted individuals, I think that is fair game. But if it generalized from the radical political statements of one or two to tar all teachers, school boards, etc. with promoting a homosexual agenda, that may be inaccurate and libelous.

Where is the lifesite story?
commented 2015-06-23 01:14:06 -0400
I was listening to the Alex Jones show on Father’s Day …… I know Alex Jones ( sometimes I find it quite entertaining) but this subject came up, he had a pastor on as a guest. He was saying that kids in school are give surveys with questions like do you parents smoke in the house, have you ever seen your dad hit your mom , have you ever caught your dad and mom having sex , there was more but I can’t remember them all but they seemed all rather invasive questions to ask elementary school age children. They touched on many subjects including the lgbt movement in the schools along with the new age liberal agenda which is the indoctrination and emasculation of the young male. You can see this here , young male as he grows older he will automatically except that these practices are the norm. He will never speak up for himself or his gender for fear of being libelled or being called a HATER so he will be a good little liberal. So you take down the male and you take out the tribe.
commented 2015-06-23 00:10:05 -0400
And in the meantime do everything in your power to protect your own kids,and yes pray, but pay attention to what they are being fed. If it isn’t taken on by parents, we know who will do it for us.
These days are “through the looking glass”, everything is backwards.
commented 2015-06-22 23:52:45 -0400
Everything seems to be stacked against the social and cultural acceptance of objective truth. When charges of “hate speech” and intolerance can be leveled against anyone who expresses views that are contrary to what is currently accepted as the politically correct norm, when the SCOC rules that in cases hate speech the truth is not a defense, when heterosexual monogamy and the traditional family unit becomes anathema to western culture, you know we’re on the road straight to hell. We’re on our own. We can expect no backing from any level of government, the courts or the police. This whole sexual radicalization of the children is a government initiative, the courts are composed primarily of liberals who embrace the hedonistic culture and the police will do little to investigate a government that fully supports all their union’s demands. Our best option is prayer, which is pretty good option. The good guys win in the end, but in the mean time expect a whole lot of evil, pain and suffering.
commented 2015-06-22 23:26:04 -0400
<i>How long before children are reporting on their parents for having dissenting views?</i>
About 10 years ago, I was working with a guy who had grown up in China under Chairman Mao and eventually emigrated to Canada when it became possible to do so. In an effort to determine just how free people were in China when Mao was in charge, I asked him what would have happened if someone had criticized Mao over dinner when only he and his immediate family were present; no strangers or even relatives, just his siblings, his parents and himself. I specifically asked what would happen if someone merely referred to Mao as a jerk, a very mild insult indeed given that he was responsible for tens of millions of deaths of his own people.

My co-worker said, “First of all, that (insult) would never have happened.” (Under Mao, no one would offer criticism of him, even very mildly, in front of even immediate family.) “But if I had said such a thing, one of my brothers would have reported me to the authorities. And if one of my brothers had said such a thing, I would have reported him.” In other words, you could not express even the mildest criticism in front of your own flesh and blood for fear of winding up in the Chinese Gulag.

THAT is where we’re heading once the indoctrination process ends and the children are all properly trained to report anyone whose views aren’t in accord with what is taught in the schools EVEN/ESPECIALLY if that person is a member of your own family. I don’t think we’ve got long to wait either. The slowness of our reactions just gives them time to brainwash a whole generation. The indoctrinated will brainwash the next generation. It will be VERY hard to stop let alone reverse.
commented 2015-06-22 23:20:40 -0400
Good for Life site for exposing the truth about the lgbt ulterior motive in public grade schools and to Brian Lilley for reporting on it. So the sex ed has already been ongoing in public schools. It’s just that now Mr. Wynne wants to legalize all this bullshit and make it much more explicit with the sex ed. If lgbt wants to educate children about their repulsive lifestyles they need to open a lesbian/homosexual/bisexual/transgender/etc etc school and fund it themselves. The public school board is not obligated to have this shoved in children’s faces. This is not what parents want their taxes to be paying for. I hope all of those lesbians involved with this who were laughing about the whole ordeal get fired and go to prison for their debauchery and underhandedness. Let’s see how much they’ll be laughing then. Bunch of child pornographers.
commented 2015-06-22 23:02:52 -0400
This Lifesite expose’ is dynamite! I can’t wait for this huge story to explode in the MSM

It should be pretty obvious by now, to anyone paying attention, that there is in fact a homosexual agenda and what that agenda in fact is:
This is a war. They started it.
I think we should start fighting back…
commented 2015-06-22 22:51:42 -0400
At the current rate that non hetrosexuals and muslims are eroding Canadian values, the answer to Francis’ question “how longe before children are reporting on their parents for having dissenting views?” could be estimated at; not very long at all.
The time to get active and push back is now or all of us here (trolls excepted) will find ourselves as the minority. Talk up the consequences of being uninformed on what the NDP & Liberal agendas are in your social circles. Without strong leadership, all decent things that we have come to expect and love about our country will be a distant memory. As Peter has mentioned, right will be wrong and will be right – it’s already happening.
commented 2015-06-22 22:39:31 -0400
Good is considered evil and evil is considered good. The scriptures have been fulfilled. Thanks Brian. I am a subscriber of life site news and was aware of this hedonistic agenda. I donate what I can to support John in his war on terrorism but I see he’s behind the 8ball. He can’t support a defense in court. I hope life site can survive because I love them. Keep up your good work to get the truth out there. God bless you
commented 2015-06-22 22:09:48 -0400
“How long before children are reporting on their parents for having dissenting views?”

Yikes! There’s a frightening thought!
commented 2015-06-22 21:13:56 -0400
The lie of Ontario or Canada for that matter of being non-secular is just that, a lie. We have the religion of “green energy”, the religion of “lgbt” and not least the religion of “peace”, Islam, being forced down our throats everyday. We need to stand up to the progressives and declare that the education that we the taxpayers pay the “educators/indoctrinators” handsomely for does not give free reign to indoctrinate children with the world views of the left. 1 +1 does not equal 2 men, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, APGW does not exist and Islam is not a religion of peace. How long before children are reporting on their parents for having dissenting views?
commented 2015-06-22 21:06:46 -0400
the same process that has been used on TV for decades and now is being used in social media sites…algorithms that literally look for social media sites and issues opposing comments.
commented 2015-06-22 19:23:24 -0400
The LGBT agenda is getting way out of control. It makes me sick to my stomach even that it exists, but they seem to be getting way too much power and pushing their homosexual agenda with a hateful agenda. It is obvious what is behind this, but it is what no one will speak about.
commented 2015-06-22 18:50:38 -0400
And here I thought the poster, “Truth: the new hate speech” was just tongue-in-cheek…

But it says volumes that an audio recording used against the persons being recorded (their own words, no less!) is translated as “hate speech”. Logically, if this recording is, indeed, “hate speech”, what does that say about those who have been recorded? And if those recorded have actually commented about how well they hide their agenda from the general populace, what does that say about their motives? (And they demand “tolerance”?!?)
commented 2015-06-22 18:42:56 -0400
How does quoting what the teacher said at public conference equal “hateful” material?
commented 2015-06-22 18:34:22 -0400
So now, under Kathleen Wynne, people can be sued for telling the truth? Death of free speech not to mention freedom of the press! Since when does holding the position of Premier mean being above the law? This is outrageous. Maybe the Federal government will end up having to step in. So does this now mean 5 investigations for Wynne, it was 4 last I heard and this would make 5. The s/curriculum is for sure her own personal agenda she’s pushing forward and it seems inconceivable that it’s legal. We all know it’s indoctrination and not education. With so many lawyers in politics, how is it Wynne is able to get away with this, indeed, for any and all of the allegations! It’s not only the present day children at stake but the future generations being brain washed. Reminds me of Hitler youth. Anyone I talk to it seems never voted for her which makes me wonder, how did she get in? I have to think, no one wants to admit voting for her and now I wonder, why don’t ‘law abiding’ Liberals go independent? Anyone?
I would respect them if they did.