The artists explained their provocative work, stating they were:
"...alarmed by the destruction being wrought on a city and state that is effectively run by one corrupt political party. The Democrats are an organized crime racket that steals tax money for their own virtue-signaling projects while 3rd-world diseases like Typhus spread unabated. It's time for Californians to wake up to the disaster that is single-party rule.
"If you are inclined to interpret the made-up word "Tijuanification" as being racist, YOU are the one making the connection between the crappy-ness of a place and the crappy-ness of the people. Sorry, that's you.
"Our intention is to point out that the GARBAGE CULTURE that created Tijuana is being transferred to the increasingly garbage-y Los Angeles by way of the decline-managers in the California Democrat Party -- and their inevitable leader Gavin Newsom -- with their Sanctuary State policies. The good news is that you racists and us non-racist culture observers can both agree that the ‘Tijuanification' of Los Angeles will not improve it."
What do you think?
Does this "art" go too far?
Or is it a good "sign" that not every artist simply regurgitates "progressive" talking points?