June 10, 2016

No penetration, no problem? Making sense of Canadian Supreme Court’s bestiality ruling

Faith GoldyArchive

The Supreme Court of Canada has just handed down a decision in the case of a man charged with bestiality, related to sexual abuse he perpetrated on his stepdaughters.


I try to make sense of this decision and have some questions for the "social justice warriors" out there who might be watching...

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-06-12 01:24:01 -0400
Too bad this news was not on the rest of the mainstream media news.
commented 2016-06-11 22:49:25 -0400
Yeah i’d message my MP,Karen Ludwig. But of course she’s a liberal and she blocked me. Liberals just can’t handle the truth.
commented 2016-06-11 13:46:52 -0400
The judges ruling that bestiality is okay must reflect their own degenerate personal lifestyles. Why should the rest of the country be subjected to their perversions? Throw these goat legged, cloven hooved bastards out onto the curb with all the rest of the garbage. Totally insane and sounding more and more like communism where the ideal is to totally crush and destroy morality and anything resembling religious values. Liberalism = communism.
commented 2016-06-11 09:41:12 -0400
Jack Pallance said, “gay marriage……now interspecies marriage? The left will never stop.”

Not until they are forced to stop by one means or another … fall of the society … judgment … whatever.
commented 2016-06-11 07:08:44 -0400
“Fair Use” asked if there is an accepted definition of re-victimization: I don’t know, but my take is that, in this specific case, it means a new process; that after one becomes a victim at the hands of someone DOING what society considers a criminal act, one seeks justice. When the justice system DOES something perceived by the victim (indeed most sane members of society) as supporting the criminal act and nullifies the perceived crime, one is then ‘re-victimized’ by the so-called justice system that upholds the CORRECTNESS of the original criminal act and in fact decides that the victim is NOT a victim at all but just the recipient of a normal, socially acceptable act, and that victim is making a mountain out of a mole-hill…after all why should the children or their parents be offended by sexual assault of this nature…wasn’t it just what judges do all the time? How is that lengthy definition?

So glad to know that bestiality is normal for Canadian judges…shows us all the class of people by whom we are being judged. Bet our politicians also support this…after all isn’t black the new white? And do you dare call a spade a spade today? Of course not! Now that WOULD be a crime: indeed a hate crime, you Spadeophobe?

Steyn is right…it is totalitarianism, full and proud. Free speech is now a crime and will cost you plenty…as we who support the Rebel know…it will never be ‘free’ again…you have to pay to have that privilege…both for the CBC, against your will, and for the Rebel, if you choose. As history goes, eventually we will all be silenced. I see the darkness at the end of the tunnel.
commented 2016-06-11 04:27:30 -0400
Hang in there FAIR USE!… Be brave… If you try, really, really hard, then " I wasn’t exactly clear on what you meant by re-victimization and the Supreme Court sending the wrong message with this ruling. I wonder if that’s because I’m not sure what the accepted definition of re-victimization is, if any.", will come to you…
commented 2016-06-10 20:14:56 -0400
That AV setup. Given the particularly excellent visuals, it’s almost heartbreaking to work with such limited equipment sometimes. But that’s no excuse not to get it done, right? I’m sure your audio would sound clearer with a good clip-on lapel mic, but you do what you can. I wasn’t exactly clear on what you meant by re-victimization and the Supreme Court sending the wrong message with this ruling. I wonder if that’s because I’m not sure what the accepted definition of re-victimization is, if any.
commented 2016-06-10 19:42:06 -0400
Just a thought:

1] Establish minimum professional qualifications for potential Supreme Court Judges, as well as their duties and what the Country expects of them and what they should expect from Parliament.
2] Elect these Judges Nationally for a maximum 5 to 10 year staggered term.
3] Compensate them appropriately for this critical job.
4] Determine specifically what they are to be held accountable for, and begin a process to do it.
NB: I doubt whether much of this has ever been done, and we are living with the consequences.
commented 2016-06-10 19:00:35 -0400
Always amazed that a gaggle of politically connected lawyers dressed in Santa suits have the power to shape Canadian society, sometimes even against the express will of the majority of Parliament.

Sometime down the road expect someone charged with sexual assault to try to link the rationale of no penetration = no bestiality with the idea that, as long as there was no penetration, neither should a non-penetrative sexual act be classed a sexual assault.

Weak argument, I know, but wait for it.
commented 2016-06-10 17:57:49 -0400
sick minded old men and women called “judges”, they need to be replaced by people with morals and common reason, oh yes and some intelligence.
commented 2016-06-10 17:55:40 -0400
That’s the problem. Even if we throw out the Liberals, the court is in the grips of liberals.
commented 2016-06-10 16:19:31 -0400
If these Liberal judges keep this up? Sharia Law will look like a darn good alternative.
How disgusting.
And here is a great question. Why the hell is this guy’s name not revealed. To protect his daughters? Thats a lark.
You know how to protect his daughters (and others)? Reveal his name. Put him in jail for life. Solitary. (or death by electricution)
commented 2016-06-10 16:07:55 -0400
Paul, ..i have zero respect for the supreme court, their rulings do not reflect the view of the majority of NORMAL Canadians and their rulings are not even made on point of law, they are a bunch of liberals catering to the criminal element and they’re all about social engineering, they have gone away beyond their job description and they took great delight in over turning harpers bills which which the average normal citizen was in favor off, harper should of refused to except their decisions and found away around them using parliamentary procedures
commented 2016-06-10 14:18:31 -0400
I am growing to have less and less respect for the Supreme Court of Canada.
Contempt of court? Yes, I have much contempt for the Supreme Court of Canada.
Their job is not to make laws; their duty is to interpret laws made by elected parliamentarians.
I would say that Supreme Court justices should be elected by the Canadian taxpayers, but then I look at Justin Trudeau and Kathleen Wynne and have second thoughts on that idea.
commented 2016-06-10 14:05:15 -0400
As if there isn’t already enough reasons to throw the lot of them out on their asses. These are a Godless people who are ruining this country, as are Liberals in general. This world deserves what is so soon to befall it. Pagan pricks.
commented 2016-06-10 13:48:04 -0400
Justine Truedumbdoeh! has already got his goat, She screwing Canada Queen Sophie Goat Truedumbdoeh!
commented 2016-06-10 12:05:47 -0400
Yes, this ruling makes way for allah-turds to continue to be able to fuck their goats when there are no women around for them to rape.
commented 2016-06-10 11:26:27 -0400
gay marriage……now interspecies marriage? The left will never stop.
commented 2016-06-10 11:21:37 -0400
These so called judges are disgusting and immoral! They are perverts at heart, and they will be judged themselves for destroying any normalcy in our society. The gate to hell has been left open and unguarded by fools.
commented 2016-06-10 11:11:53 -0400
This is why the lefties like to go on about “nuanced” issues. It allows them go thorough all manner of mental gymnastics to always find a way to support every perversion and evil known throughout history and to cake it “Progressive”, Change does not necessarily = progress.
commented 2016-06-10 11:04:35 -0400
This decision paves the way for a goat in every household. Another step in Trudeau’s plan to seal the deal for refujihadist votes?
commented 2016-06-10 11:03:21 -0400
I would have expected more empathy for animals from the kangaroos on the SCC.

These people need to be elected or changed out periodically some how – they get into this unaccountable position for life and somewhere along the course of events they go senile or become an echo chamber of errant inbred ideas.

This lot I hold to be both senile and filled with weird ideas that they are some sort of immortal god like givers of wisdom – same beliefs you’d get on crack.
commented 2016-06-10 10:36:47 -0400
Pretty quiet today, fewer attacks!
Must be a little Sheet Head holiday!

Ramadan by the numbers

Ramadan Bombathon 2016 Day number 5

Muslims often insist that other religions are just as violent as theirs and that the bigger problem is “Islamophobia”.
We put that narrative to the rest each Ramadan with a running count of ALL terror attacks categorized by motive.

Motive – Terror in the name of Islam………………..Attacks = 47……….Kills = 280
Motive – All other religions combined …………….Attacks = 0…………Kills = 0
Motive – By Islamophobes…………………………….Attacks = 0…………Kills = 0

Source: TheReligionofPeace.com

Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.

Author unknown

commented 2016-06-10 10:29:13 -0400
I’ve worked for a couple of judges, they’re an odd breed.
commented 2016-06-10 10:28:53 -0400
There is true evil sitting on those scoc benches and unfortunately there are many, many people in this country who worship at their feet. There should never any justification or acceptance for either bestiality or pedophilia but both are becoming the new “normal” in this country and society will only descend further into the mire. Relativism has no moral limit or compass.
commented 2016-06-10 10:12:46 -0400
I’m not sure what I can say about this without some sort of contempt of court charge.
commented 2016-06-10 10:04:10 -0400
I wonder how many of the judges, nominated and not elected, sitting in the Supreme Court of Canada are followers of Ayatollah Khomeini (may he rot in hell) who claimed that bestiality is proper and acceptable in Islam!

Source thereligionofpeace.com

Bestiality? Why not? Ayatollah Khomeini said: “A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.” (From Khomeini’s book, Tahrir al-Vasyleh, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990).

I’m just wondering if the animals killed using the halal method are raped before they are dispatched.

It is time to overthrow the Supreme Court of Canadian Idiots. Where ther hell do these people get their moral compasses from? Islam???

commented 2016-06-10 10:02:01 -0400
I am so glad we pay these enlightened individuals to come up with this rot.