March 16, 2019

Media self-censors homophobic slur Leafs defenceman Rielly never uttered

David MenziesMission Specialist

The Toronto Maple Leafs organization, the NHL, and the media collectively lost their minds over a so-called “homophobic slur” allegedly uttered by Leafs defenceman Morgan Rielly during a recent game against the Lightning.

It was a day of infamy as the Leafs, the NHL and the ink-stained scribes examined and re-examined the video evidence over and over again... like they were the FBI examining the Zapruder footage of the JFK assassination.

So, what was that “homophobic slur” that Rielly supposedly uttered?

Well, who knows but apparently like the Harry Potter villain referred to as “He Who Must Not Be Named,” likewise, the slur cannot be named either.

Not even an initial is permitted like how we now use the term “N-word” to describe that egregious slur a racist would use to describe a black person.

Maybe the “F-word” then?

Sorry, sports fans. Apparently even that is too offensive for society’s tender ears.

In the end, the NHL agreed that audio evidence provided by no less than TEN microphones proved there was no homophobia uttered yet when armchair quarterbacks offered their analysis of an incident that never happened, the conclusion was that the “Maple Leafs were right to speak out about a word that was never spoken.”


Oh, and to make absolutely sure that everyone was clear that the Toronto Maple Leafs is not a homophobic organization, General Manager Kyle Dubas staged a press conference noting Rielly is so pro-homosexual that he’s actually marched in Toronto’s Gay Pride Parade!

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2019-03-17 15:47:01 -0400
Stephen E., pretty good summary of leftist thought and actins in our time.
commented 2019-03-17 11:33:20 -0400
Maybe they believed that he thought it? Along with the Quebec language police (its a real thing: “Regie de la langue Francais” – watch your restricted use of the English language), we now have language laws from the illiberal Liberal government of the day, and apparently Future Crime thought police because you may say such a thing.

Yes, he did say "raggit:, but who cares. In his heart he must have or would say “faggot”, a word once associated with cigarettes in the UK, amongst other meanings.

So now he is labeled with the uncrime of not saying something. The piling on will be remembered. and he will forever be labeled a homophobe. The correction of the story will be, well, forgotten, but not the uncrime itself,

What a way to ruin a person’s life and career. May the shunning commence.
commented 2019-03-17 11:22:36 -0400
I guess the Tommy Robinson judge’s thinking has spread. You can be found guilty of what you might say or do in the future.
commented 2019-03-17 01:03:49 -0400
commented 2019-03-17 00:58:01 -0400
We will punch back…
commented 2019-03-17 00:18:10 -0400
Sorry, Robert Greeley!
commented 2019-03-17 00:17:22 -0400
I agree.
commented 2019-03-17 00:15:30 -0400
Yet, the left wing nutcase who punched out the conservative guy at Berkeley called him so many names pertaining to the female anatomy, the video was nothing but bleeps. At least hockey players are gender sensitive.
commented 2019-03-17 00:14:52 -0400
David Menzies, in the court of public opinion you have been found guilty of providing rational thought and cohesive argument. The sentence: to spend the rest of your natural life providing rational thoughts and cohesive arguments for the rebel with no possibility of quitting or retirement.
commented 2019-03-17 00:07:21 -0400
Gotta admit.. Menzies is a true stand up… Reporter.. Thanks David… You are doing a great job!.. I’m very appreciative of all your efforts and accomplishments.. keep on truck ’in Brother.
commented 2019-03-16 20:31:19 -0400
thanks robert. every suck holing govt. should here that inciteful eagles hit-get over it, especially the twits in victoria ruining this great city. the UN should take a listen as well.
commented 2019-03-16 20:20:42 -0400
funny we all know he said fag. who cares. he shot his face off. lets live in the real world were bad things are sometimes said. pathetic though as always-cover up free speech.
commented 2019-03-16 16:59:50 -0400
To “each is own” was on purpose… that covers all the genders that are now in place…
commented 2019-03-16 16:59:38 -0400
I just read the comments.
commented 2019-03-16 16:54:54 -0400 the way.. I’m encouraging people to bury my comments and video with well thought out comments.. to each is own.
commented 2019-03-16 15:59:33 -0400
commented 2019-03-16 15:59:16 -0400
Okay.. Is.. “your mama wears army socks” offensive to the liberalist goofballs? What about the human beings being BBQ like a pig a few years ago?? Or drowned in a cage?? That’s not offensive to the Liberalist Globalist Cesspoolian Goofs???

Okay.. Is.. “your mama wears army socks” offensive to the liberalist goofballs? What about the human beings being BBQ like a pig a few years ago?? Or drowned in a cage?? That’s not offensive to the Liberalist Globalist Cesspoolian Goofs???Get over it..!!!!
commented 2019-03-16 14:50:29 -0400
Was it Faggot – a bundle of sticks?
FCKING bundle of sticks!!

Not faggot? but raggit the hockey term?
Geez is that ever frickin gay.

Anyway, real homo’s think faggot is a term of endearment. Its only the gender confused sjw’s and apologist liberal progressives who get their panties all twisted in a knot over it.

Just tell me the word I am not allowed to say and I will scream it from the rooftops. With the correct context of course and only with affection.
commented 2019-03-16 14:14:56 -0400
In truth it was two F-words…(Forgive me Ezra)…Fucking Faggot…lol?