May 17, 2018

Media ignores Trudeau's "refugees" threatening to murder their daughter

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

On last night's show, I looked into a disturbing story from a Fredericton, New Brunswick, local paper the Daily Gleaner.

Two of the "Syrian refugees" Trudeau rushed into the country have repeatedly threatened to murder their daughter for various "honor crimes".

The first incident was in April 2016, when Ahmad Ayoub threatened to poison his daughter Bayan's food after he discovered an iPad she'd won in a contest.

Last summer, Ahmad told his daughter "it would be better to slaughter her" than let her continue meeting and communicating with a non-Muslim man.

In February 2018, Ahmad again threatened to kill his daughter if she received messages from people she'd worked with at the local food bank.

You would think a father repeatedly threatening to murder his daughter would make national news, but I haven't' seen this story anywhere outside of New Brunswick.

How many other stories is the media party ignoring?

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-05-18 04:01:16 -0400
Now where is that Muslim snitch line that Faith Goldy set up?
commented 2018-05-17 19:19:15 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 35,319 Attacks, 229,002 Killed, 309,076 Injured that we know of.
commented 2018-05-17 17:12:42 -0400
James Risdon commented -“… Uttering threats is not usually considered by either the courts or the news media as serious a crime as a murder case. When it comes to prioritizing the news stories to be covered on any given day, it only makes sense to cover the more serious crimes at the expense of not having the resources to cover the court cases of lesser offenses. Threatening someone is serious but not as serious as actually killing them. In this case, there was no actual violence. …”

buzzer sound thank you for playing but your answer is incorrect!!

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-264.1.html
Uttering threats 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or © to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.
commented 2018-05-17 16:33:22 -0400
Media dare not tread on trudeau’s favorite cult, and no it isn’t the people’s temple.
commented 2018-05-17 15:05:44 -0400
James Risdon
James, the Rebel would not need to cover stories of a “Caucasian Christian family” in which the dad threatened to kill his daughter for dating a black person, because such a story would indeed be headlines throughout mainstream media. Therefore it makes sense that you are unlikely to see such stories reported here.
Of course you may speak to CBC or CTV’s reasons for not covering this. Hint; it’s just not the direction of bigotry that turns their crank.
commented 2018-05-17 14:56:13 -0400
Why did they come to Canada? Free stuff, Free stuff, Free stuff…………………….

Jihadi Justin and lefties are destroying this country. Had this been a white couple, or gasp!, Conservative, the Communist Broadcast Corp. would have breathless report, after report, after report for days and weeks, if not longer. Remember Wafergate?
commented 2018-05-17 13:44:30 -0400
Brunswick News, the New Brunswick-based media company owned by the Irvings, is not “hiding” this story behind a paywall while making “lots of stuff” available for free at all.

The company’s business model is that news stories from its newspapers are only available with few exceptions behind a paywall. That means that if anyone wants to read the newspapers online, they have to buy a subscription.

Love it or hate it, that’s their business model.

Brunswick News is not at all hiding this story because it deals with Muslims and a criminal court case. That’s simply untrue.

Given that Irving has a near monopoly on newspapers in New Brunswick and that The Daily Gleaner is their only newspaper in the city where this court case was heard, it’s not at all surprising that no other newspapers carried the story.

I can’t speak to the CBC or CTV’s reasons for not covering the story but let’s be fair here too. Uttering threats is not usually considered by either the courts or the news media as serious a crime as a murder case. When it comes to prioritizing the news stories to be covered on any given day, it only makes sense to cover the more serious crimes at the expense of not having the resources to cover the court cases of lesser offenses. Threatening someone is serious but not as serious as actually killing them. In this case, there was no actual violence.

Ask yourself this. If this was a Caucasian, Christian family and the dad was in a rage and making stupid threats because his adult daughter was dating Black students at the local university and the court reacted the same way, would The Rebel be reporting on that case at all? Or would The Rebel be questioning why “the Media Party” didn’t cover the trial of the Caucasian dad who uttered threats because his daughter was dating Black guys?

I can’t say I’ve seen a whole lot of stories from The Rebel on court cases of uttering threats under those kinds of circumstances, even though these kinds of things also happen.

So maybe there’s your answer.
commented 2018-05-17 13:22:55 -0400
If I understand it correctly the judge in this case agrees with defense lawyer & believes that it’s okay in syrian culture to threaten somebody with life & not be liable for uttering death threats. Judge based his verdict taking their ‘cultural difference’ into consideration.
Has the judge studied syrian/muslim culture before reaching this decision, how does he knows that uttering death threats in syrian/muslim culture doesn’t constitute to a real threat?? I guess the judge has never heard of a lawyer lying before.
We’ve people in canada from at least 160 different cultures, they all evolved differently from the western culture on which our country was founded & its laws are based. So, from now on canadian courts will give decisions based on the ethnicity & culture of the person charged instead of the established laws of Canada.
Are canadian judges going to study 160 different cultures or will just concur with the defense lawyer about the extent of ‘cultural difference’ of a culprit??
Does that means the same logic would be applied to the people of certain cultures from Caribbean, Africa & Papua where cannibalism is practiced as part of their culture, or the ‘Thugs’ from India who practiced their vocation as part of religious ritual??
From now on Canadian laws won’t be applied to non-white people, they’ll be judged by courts based on their cultural practices & beliefs.
Thanks to our evil politicians & their destructive immigration policies Canada will soon be like some lawless region from medieval period.