May 17, 2018

Meghan Markle isn’t fit to become royalty

Jack BuckbyRebel Contributor


I’m a staunch royalist, but I cannot bring myself to support this royal wedding this Saturday. I will not be celebrating it, because Meghan Markle is not fit to become royalty.

She’s a classless, political loud mouth.

You might say the same about me, but I’m not becoming royalty!

I think it’s important to maintain the integrity of this historic and wonderful British institution. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are bringing it into disrepute, and making a mockery of our country.

 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-05-18 23:22:37 -0400
Dear Mr. Buckby,

Assuming you read people’s comments about your video…please explain your statement that Prince Harry isn’t a Royal. Thank you.
commented 2018-05-18 12:23:16 -0400
I totally agree with you Jack.
In fact I told my wife that this marriage will not last because she is a jackass and a gold digger. I said those things when they first announced their intentions to marry, before listening to your comments which are right on.
Harry is an idiot and will suffer for it, this woman is for herself and nobody else.
commented 2018-05-18 11:52:19 -0400
As far as the Royal Family not being involved in politics, how about Prince Charles being an advocate for anthropogenic global warming?
commented 2018-05-18 10:02:03 -0400
Here is what my Christel Ball says, The marriage will be a Train Wreck like most of us predict, and it will last a year or two. Here is the future problem, Black Lives Matters will say the Marriage didn’t work because everyone in Buckingham Palace is prejudice against Blacks as Megan’s mother was Black.
That will be Britain’s big story, which will move to North America.
commented 2018-05-18 06:54:05 -0400
Shrug. Soap and pulp for the masses.
commented 2018-05-18 05:41:56 -0400
Jack,
1. You mention that the “royal family” is “above politics”: Did anyone tell Prince Chuck, the big man-made global warming activist?
2. You also mention that Prince Harry isn’t “really” a “royal”: He’s the son of Princess Diana and Prince Chuck, so why isn’t he a “royal”?
commented 2018-05-18 04:23:15 -0400
Wallis Simpson was another American social climber. I’ve read that Edward V!!! didn’t have a very good life with her after that wedding.
commented 2018-05-18 03:58:18 -0400
I like what France did to their own royals.
commented 2018-05-18 02:49:12 -0400
Jimmy Reece very true.
Tom Bradly i want to agree but if he wants to have all the benefits of his position then he should have to respect that position as well. If he renounces those then yeah he can marry whoever he wants.
commented 2018-05-18 00:19:43 -0400
Perhaps the rumours are true and he’s not Charles son. That would explain why he still has a full head of hair, unlike his balb brother. Anyways, he should be able to marry whoever the hell he wants.
commented 2018-05-17 23:22:11 -0400
Harry is head over heels for her, and can’t see the truth. If she doesn’t get pregnant right away(her clock says its getting late) she won’t last much more than a year, is what I wager. That wedding is going to be one hell of an event though and I will be watching as I did for Charles and Diana’s wedding. Its a Royal wedding after all.
I think Harry is too nice a guy for her. I wonder what grand mummy thinks?
commented 2018-05-17 22:50:47 -0400
It’s far from rocket science, as Jack says, Markle should not be brought into the Royal Family, she’s a loser, but then again so is Swastika wearing Harry. All the suitable women in the world that he had to choose from and he got an old, divorcee with a left wing political agenda. Give her time, once the honeymoon is over, watch the real her surface. Watching her manner on video, when she comments on issues, I see a lot of ugliness hidden away in there. Harry is due for some pain.
commented 2018-05-17 22:11:08 -0400
I think you’re right, Jack. She’s a social climber.
commented 2018-05-17 21:08:23 -0400
Robert Mcclelland….I believe the Daily Mail is correct about the Train Wreck. Harry’s father didn’t exactly pick the perfect partner for himself.
commented 2018-05-17 19:14:41 -0400
A quick perusal of the Daily Mail shows that Meghan’s family are a total train wreck.
commented 2018-05-17 17:06:18 -0400
This will end badly.
commented 2018-05-17 15:40:29 -0400
FYI Rebels

The malignant troll is posting as Jimmy Reece again.
commented 2018-05-17 15:37:15 -0400
I don’t care enough about this to say either way.
commented 2018-05-17 14:53:47 -0400
Rebel I expected more out of you than this pettiness with Megan Markle and questioning whether Harry is a prince or not. This is deplorable….and something that I had not expected from the Rebel. I could only listen to the presentor for a few seconds before I shut him down. I usually like to hear what others think to give a judgement, but to comment about how Ms. Markle is not address herself as Miss shows how outdated this guy really is. Ms. has been used for years for the addressing of a woman, not a little girl. Highly disappointed.
commented 2018-05-17 14:26:26 -0400
She is certainly not Royalty in the same way that Iman Justin & his hair idolizers consider HIM royalty.
commented 2018-05-17 14:04:11 -0400
Jack, I don’t follow this stuff anymore, so here is my question; why did you say twice that Harry isn’t a Royal? Isn’t Prince Charles his father? Isn’t Charles the Queen’s son?
I admire your courage for saying that she doesn’t belong, however the UK has much bigger problems.
commented 2018-05-17 13:36:48 -0400
I’m not a fan of Markle’s politics, nor a Royal watcher, but Jack, seriously? You’re acting the stereotypical British snob by bashing a “commoner” fiancée.
commented 2018-05-17 13:30:15 -0400
I guess you can’t help who you fall in love with.