July 13, 2017

Menzies' PC Guide to Talking Terrorism

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

On last night's show, guest-host David "The Menzoid" Menzies explained how to remain "politically correct" while talking about terrorism.

Obviously, there should be no discussion about the influence of Islam. And we must always remind ourselves that Islam is a "religion of peace", despite the fact that prove otherwise...

Emphasizing the race of the attacker is permitted if they are white, and we must constantly remind ourselves of white privilege and Timothy McVeigh.  

WATCH David's video to hear all his tips, and how Kathleen Wynne thinks we should combat "Islamophobia".

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-07-14 05:12:28 -0400
“Ayan there is not only whites in GP…” ,

I did not say there were only White people in Grande Prairie. But ethnically diverse cities like Toronto and Vancouver are considerably safer than predominantly White cities like Grande Prairie and Red Deer.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/canada-most-dangerous-cities-2016-safe-your-city/

“and many of the terror attacks in the mid east countries you mentioned were on other religions.”

This is what I quoted:

“In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97% of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years.”
commented 2017-07-14 05:08:02 -0400
“And my stepson was attacked by a Muslim , the cops laid no charges, so there was no incident to account for in the stats…”

I am glad the cops figured out your stepson was making things up without any evidence to back them up (just as you did in your post)…
commented 2017-07-14 05:04:29 -0400
“Assuming I take your statistics at face value – Muslims may have been between 82 and 97% of the victims, but they were also 99.99% of the perpetrators. What does that tell you?”

It tells me that Ezra Levant and the like are wrong when they claim terrorists are after non-Muslims.

You did not provide a source for the 99.99% figure. In EU, White people are responsible for the vast majority of terrorist incidents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism#/media/File:Terro.jpg
commented 2017-07-14 05:02:05 -0400
“The article specifically is about terrorism, not crime.”

The article is also about political correctness.

A Grande Prairie resident is far more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by a White person than a victim of a terrorist attack.

Canada is a much safer country today than it was in the 70’s when Canada’s population was overwhelmingly White.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/canadas-crime-rate-drops-with-homicides-at-46-year-low/article13416456/

Ethnically diverse cities like Toronto and Vancouver are considerably safer than predominantly White cities like Grande Prairie and Red Deer.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/canada-most-dangerous-cities-2016-safe-your-city/

Is political correctness preventing us from discussing how we can address rampant crime in predominantly White cities like Grande Prairie and keep Canadians safe?
commented 2017-07-14 01:26:05 -0400
Ayan there is not only whites in GP , and many of the terror attacks in the mid east countries you mentioned were on other religions.
commented 2017-07-14 01:24:42 -0400
Ayan using liberal rags as your source is quite laughable. And sorry to tell you Edmontons murder rate and crime rate went up once a certain community got larger here. And my stepson was attacked by a Muslim , the cops laid no charges, so there was no incident to account for in the stats, but i doubt your narrow mind will comprehend what i am trying to point out.
commented 2017-07-14 01:11:04 -0400
@AYAN RAY: Assuming I take your statistics at face value – Muslims may have been between 82 and 97% of the victims, but they were also 99.99% of the perpetrators. What does that tell you?
commented 2017-07-14 00:23:23 -0400
While discussing the influence of Islam on terrorism, let’s not conveniently forget that Muslims are victims of terrorism to a far greater extent than non-Muslims.

“In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97% of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years.”

“Between 2004 and 2013 about half of all terrorist attacks, and 60% of fatalities due to terrorist attacks, took place in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan – all of which have a mostly Muslim population.”

“Most terrorist attacks are rooted in geopolitics. Religion is certainly a part of them, but it is not the only part.”

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30883058
commented 2017-07-14 00:10:41 -0400
Grande Prairie in Alberta is Canada’s most dangerous city.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/canada-most-dangerous-cities-2016-safe-your-city/

Muslims account for less than 1% of Grande Prairie residents.

http://www12.statcan.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4819012&Data=Count&SearchText=grande%20prairie&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&A1=Religion&B1=All&Custom=&TABID=1

I wonder why we are not talking about White Christians (the majority of Grande Prairie residents) committing crimes in Canada?

Is it because of political correctness?
commented 2017-07-13 19:29:09 -0400
GARY WIEBE no,no I for one do not see your comment as politically incorrect or as a hate crime. I see it as the many pieces of Islam. After all they keep on telling us that Islam is the religion of piece or is that peace or pice or – I don’t know, but I think you described it very well. Good job.
commented 2017-07-13 18:27:45 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 33,681 Attacks, 217,334 Killed, 298,547 Injured that we know of
commented 2017-07-13 18:25:39 -0400
Oh, sorry! Was that comment not politically correct? Was it a hate crime? Just wondering.
commented 2017-07-13 18:24:36 -0400
Islam: the religion of "pieces of you here . . . pieces of you there . . . pieces of you everywhere.