March 14, 2017

NEW video: More anti-Semitic hate from a Canadian imam

Christopher WilsonRebel Commentator

As originally reported in CIJ News, Sheikh Abdiqani Mursal, an imam at Toronto’s Masjid Al Hikma mosque, read a passage from the Hadith called “Turmoil And Portents Of The Last Hour.”

From this passage, the imam read the following words purportedly spoken by the Prophet Muhammad, then recorded by his followers after his death:

“You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me); kill him.”

Similar to the “filthy Jew” talk at mosques in Toronto and Montreal, the antisemitism isn’t being spewed because the imam has an issue with Israel, or is sympathetic to the Palestinians.

Hatred of Jews is baked into their scripture and these Imams are reading what they believe to be the unquestionable narrations of the final prophet of God, Muhammad.

Islam purports to be the final revelation of God, that we are not allowed to question or reform, and that is where its inherent problem of incompatibility with Western values begins.

The fight to reform Islam is the greatest challenge of this era. While we have a few allies like Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah, I have yet to see one leading imam or anyone who isn’t living in the west attempt to speak out.

Justin Trudeau once expressed a desire to get to the root causes of Islamic extremism, well, this would be a good place to start.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-03-14 10:29:17 -0400
If one was able to somehow ‘get rid’ of all the Moslems and all the Globalists – and the myriad of degenerate weirdos, criminals and traitors under those stinky tents, one could pretty much solve most of the problems in the world today…
That may be an ugly truth, but it’s the truth nonetheless.
What do we do instead?
We elect more Globalist scum and invite more Moslem terrorists into our home…
Oh Canada.
commented 2017-03-14 09:54:21 -0400
So basically, the goal of the islamofacist motion M103 is to institutionalize anti-Semiticism.

Makes sense because both Baby Doc and his foreign affairs minister are grandchildren of anti-Semites.
commented 2017-03-14 09:41:29 -0400
Trying to fit a theocracy into a democracy is like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. It can’t be done. Period.
commented 2017-03-14 09:30:28 -0400
Sorry about all the “>”, it is what it is.
commented 2017-03-14 09:28:33 -0400
The following is a little long but worth the read.
It is not of my doing, so I cannot take credit for it. Subject: Very interesting and worth reading

I’m tolerant of all religions but this is not religious intolerance, it’s WAR and we better step up to it.

>>> Switzerland – What’s in a handshake? Well worth reading.
>>>>>> Sometimes it’s the little things that are most telling. At first glance this may seem like a trivial story but what lies hidden beneath it could have serious consequences for our children and grandchildren.

>>>>>> In Switzerland it has long been customary for students to shake the hands of their teachers at the beginning and end of the school day. It’s a sign of solidarity and mutual respect between teacher and pupil, one that is thought to encourage the right classroom atmosphere. Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of Swiss culture and daily life.
>>>>>> And the reason she felt compelled to speak out about the handshake is that two Muslim brothers, aged 14 and 15, who have lived in Switzerland for several years (and thus are familiar with its mores), in the town of Therwil, near Basel, refused to shake the hands of their teacher, a woman, because, they claimed, this would violate Muslim teachings that contact with the opposite sex is allowed only with family members.
>>>>>> At first the school authorities decided to avoid trouble, and initially granted the boys an exemption from having to shake the hand of any female teacher. But an uproar followed, as Mayor Reto Wolf explained to the BBC: “the community was unhappy with the decision taken by the school. In our culture and in our way of communication a handshake is normal and sends out respect for the other person, and this has to be brought home to the children in school.”
>>>>>> Therwil’s Educational Department reversed the school’s decision, explaining in a statement on May 25 that the school’s exemption was lifted because “the public interest with respect to equality between men and women and the integration of foreigners significantly outweighs the freedom of religion.” It added that a teacher has the right to demand a handshake. Furthermore, if the students refused to shake hands again “the sanctions called for by law will be applied,” which included a possible fine of up to 5,000 dollars.
>>>>>> This uproar in Switzerland, where many people were enraged at the original exemption granted to the Muslim boys, did not end after that exemption was itself overturned by the local Educational Department. The Swiss understood quite clearly that this was more than a little quarrel over handshakes; it was a fight over whether the Swiss would be masters in their own house, or whether they would be forced to yield, by the granting of special treatment, to the Islamic view of the proper relations between the sexes. It is one battle – small but to the Swiss significant – between overweening Muslim immigrants and the indigenous Swiss.
>>>>>> Naturally, once the exemption was withdrawn, all hell broke loose among Muslims in Switzerland. The Islamic Central Council of Switzerland, instead of yielding quietly to the Swiss decision to uphold the handshaking custom, criticized the ruling in hysterical terms, claiming that the enforcement of the handshaking is “totalitarian” (!) because its intent is to “forbid religious people from meeting their obligations to God.”
>>>>>> That, of course, was never the “intent” of the long-standing handshaking custom, which was a nearly-universal custom in Switzerland, and in schools had to do only with encouraging the right classroom atmosphere of mutual respect between instructor and pupil, of which the handshake was one aspect.
>>>>>> The Swiss formulation of the problem – weighing competing claims — will be familiar to Americans versed in Constitutional adjudication. In this case “the public interest with respect to equality” of the sexes and the “integration of foreigners” (who are expected to adopt Swiss ways, not force the Swiss to exempt them from some of those ways) were weighed against the “religious obligations to God” of Muslims, and the former interests found to outweigh the latter.
>>>>>> What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward sharia dominance]. Each little victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that society to meet Muslim requirements.
>>>>>> The handshake has been upheld and, what’s more, a stiff fine now will be imposed on those who continue to refuse to shake hands with a female teacher. This is a heartening sign of non-surrender by the Swiss. But the challenges of the Muslims within Europe to the laws and customs of the indigenes have no logical end and will not stop.
>>>>>> And the greater the number of Muslims allowed to settle in Europe, the stronger and more frequent their challenges will be. They are attempting not to integrate, but rather to create, for now, a second, parallel society, and eventually, through sheer force of numbers from both migration and by outbreeding the Infidels, to fashion not a parallel society but one society — now dominated by Muslim sharia.
>>>>>> The Swiss handshaking dispute has received some, but not enough, press attention. Presumably, it’s deemed too inconsequential a matter to bother with. But the Swiss know better. And so should we.

>>>>>> There’s an old Scottish saying that in one variant reads: “Many a little makes a mickle.” That is, the accumulation of many little things leads to one big thing. That’s what’s happening in Europe today. This was one victory for the side of sanity. There will need to be a great many more.

>>>>>> This needs circulation far and wide.
commented 2017-03-14 09:13:53 -0400
I continue to be amazed at these things that are said in mosques each week, the hate preaching. Why do all of the “moderates” at the mosque, who claim on all the TV interviews that they are not violent, continue to listen to this garbage and say nothing. If I were at a worship service, or a prayer meeting, and heard someone pray this, I would immediately confront that person. After 33 years as a Christian, at worship and Bible study every week, I have NEVER heard anything remotely close to what these guys say.
I wonder what my liberal family members, who label me as bigoted, Islamophobic, etc. would say if they asked me to pray at a family dinner and I prayed for the destruction of all non-Christians and to be cleansed from the filth of the Jews and Muslims?! There would be an uproar!
commented 2017-03-14 09:06:18 -0400
The reformation of Islam is taking place already – ISIS and all the others that the west likes to label radicals or extremists. The Christian Reformation brought Christianity back to its roots – the Bible as the authority – sola scriptura. And so we have seen a continued separation of the church and the state. This has been good for all the world. Unfortunately Catholicism, Anglicanism, and some other wingies still sleep with the government, but that is not what Jesus taught.
The root of Islam is violence. Islam has been sleeping for centuries, away from its core teachings. What we are seeing in the immigration, violence, “creeping sharia”, and imperialism of present-day Muslims is a return to the roots of Islam. The reformation of Islam is underway already.
What we see in those labeled “moderate” Muslims is not a reformation, but a betrayal of Islam. They are making up their own religion, and it is not true Islam. They do what liberals do in any religion – cherry-pick the parts of their authoritative writings that suit them. Just as that is not the way true Christianity works – cherry-picking the palatable parts of the Bible – it is also not the way true Islam works.
These so-called “moderates’” heads will roll when the real Muslims take over, or they will abandon their attempts at recreating Islam and take up the sword as well. I really do not trust any of them! They are like sheep, and all they need is for their imam to give the word and even the “moderates” will go head-hunting.