September 30, 2016

Muslims demand “Islamophobia” be criminalized, but refuse to define it

Victor LaszloRebel Commentator

At the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, or OSCE — an annual meeting which lasts two weeks — Muslim delegates demanded criticism of Islam be criminalized.

The OSCE is an intergovernmental body which, like the EU and the UN at times, seems to have become an instrument for the destruction of classical liberalism and real human rights, and the implementation of cultural Marxism and Islamic sharia.

Last year, Major (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin of Unconstrained Analytics, exposed members of the panel, Canada included, who intended to make truth no longer a defense against "hate speech," that is, "Islamophobia."

This year, various Islamic delegates to the OSCE made even clearer demands that criticism of Islam must be a criminal offense. They also refused to define "Islamophobia."

In these videos, Stephen Coughlin points out the totalitarian nature of criminalizing thoughts and words which are "Islamophobic" without even defining it.

The side event at the OSCE to which Maj. Coughlin referred, can be seen below:

In fact, at this year's OSCE event, another thought crimes invention was advanced: "Message Crimes".

From Gates of Vienna:

The most recent addition to the lexicon of leftist grievance is “message crime”, which popped up at this year’s OSCE/HDIM conference in Warsaw. According to the annotated agenda, message crimes constitute

…a rejection of the victim’s identity which can have a marginalizing effect on entire communities. Secondary victimization, where representatives from broader society deny or minimize the seriousness of the incident, can also reinforce and perpetuate this message.

There is no real attempt to define the new term, just a catchphrase-laden description. And consider the terms used to describe these “crimes”: “rejection”, “identity”, “marginalizing”, etc. That is, the characteristics of what is being anathematized are so vague as to make any judgment entirely subjective.

Many other freedom minded people also gave interventions at the OSCE on behalf of genuine liberalism. All of them are about two minutes long and all are worth seeing. 

Dave Pettys from ACT for America:

Order of St. Andrew speaks on oppression of Christians by Muslims in Turkey:

Clare Lopez, former CIA agent, speaks in no uncertain terms about Islamic antisemitism:

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff speaks for PAX Europa, on arrests of people who criticize immigration policies and Islam.

Atheist Ireland:

For more information on the OSCE and its seeming mission of Islamification, please see this Gates of Vienna post as well.

A related event, the Islamophobia summit, gives away a lot even in just the banner picture. The support for those who wish to criminalize criticism of Islam appears to be as much from communists as from Muslims themselves.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-10-02 12:54:15 -0400
I’m not Islamophobic. I’m Islamo-hating. I hate that fucking religion of retarded perpetual victims and all the twats that support it in the name of religious freedoms. How can these hypocrites support a religion that doesn’t support “freedom of religion” or “freedom of speech”? Only a leftard mind can defend it.
Hey but don’t refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding if you’re a Christian baker, you racist homophobes. I’m sure they’ll be defending the Islamic bakeries from making any cakes for a gay wedding or maybe a barmitzvah. Islam can fuck right off out of our lives like we got the Christians to do. Don’t come door to door, don’t preach to our kids in schools etc and if you don’t want to bake me a cake I’ll go get it elsewhere. If you want to pray, please ensure it’s behind the privacy of your front door as well and fuck off out of our lives elsewhere.
commented 2016-10-02 11:43:21 -0400
Wanting to redefine the legal definition for truth/ free speech/hate speech, race/racist, religion/politics, and demand Islamophobia be made illegal when those who are crying about it cannot clearly define it ,means we are in very dangerous waters these days. It means there is an attempt to rewrite all the rules and under who’s agenda is this being brought forth as the ‘new correct’?
commented 2016-10-01 19:21:08 -0400
I should speak for myself. I hate Islam.
commented 2016-10-01 12:00:32 -0400
Chaisson hates Jews, we hate Islam, see the difference?
If the fools were able to define it and convince western governments to make it illegal there would be an uprising against Islam and our own governments so swift, it almost make me wish for it.
commented 2016-10-01 09:02:42 -0400
EVIL = islam = trash
commented 2016-10-01 00:19:58 -0400
The Islam bastards are just too frigging ignorant to define this! Maybe they need to ask that Islamic bastard Obumer how to define it! Or TruDope.
commented 2016-09-30 21:45:56 -0400
Not crying DH just laughing at your repressed obsession with Ezra.
commented 2016-09-30 21:06:48 -0400
Bill Elder the trolls hate him for a few reasons, he tells the truth and criticizes equally and he thinks for himself and does not just do as he is told like the left wing drones do. Also they are jealous because he has a live non inflatable wife and does not live in his moms basement.
commented 2016-09-30 21:03:51 -0400
Bill, not sure how your hyper-crying masks Ezra’s crying, but nice try, buttercup!
commented 2016-09-30 21:02:23 -0400
DH yeah he objects to ACTUAL bigotry, maybe learn the difference halfwit. Now i hear your mom calling upstairs, dinner is ready.
commented 2016-09-30 20:34:57 -0400
…….And D.H. Chaisson continues to obsess over Ezra and manipulates his privates while typing his puerile mumbling

What is it about Levan’t’s ability to attract auto eroticism in leftard trolls
commented 2016-09-30 19:59:21 -0400
Lol, The Reble prints this story and Ezra Levant continues to cry about “anti-semitism.” Love it!
commented 2016-09-30 19:47:22 -0400
Who are all these self righteous idiots discussing what we can or cannot say. I note that the Muslims were well represented at these meetings.

If I want to call a Muslim a Savage, at least 70% of the time I would be correct. If people do not like to be labeled for what they are, then they should ignore it or go back to where they came from.

This is nothing more than Political Correctness and thought control.

To all free people, never forget, A spade is a Spade.

To Hell with the UN, Islam, Marxist and Liberals.Let us not be shafted by these idiots.
commented 2016-09-30 19:42:57 -0400
I don’t care what baffleab label they put on it, persecuting/prosecution people for a political opinion is political cleansing and historically this always precedes a genocide. Islam is tyranny it is current running genocides where it controls the state – any acquiescence to this perverse theocracy is to side with totalitarianism. – and if this were ever to come near to being law in Canada, civil violence will be common and police will find themselves on the wrong side of the law.
commented 2016-09-30 19:30:09 -0400
Islamophobia, noun: All deviations in behaviour from exalting Sharia Law. Examples include criticizing Islam or pointing out truths that Islamists would prefer remain hidden.
commented 2016-09-30 18:52:19 -0400
Lynda it is the secular left atheists who is pushing this crap on us.
commented 2016-09-30 18:11:02 -0400
Was there such a thing as Naziphopia during WWll? Furthermore, we all have a right to question and criticize ANY religion. That`s why so many of us become atheists.
commented 2016-09-30 18:08:52 -0400
To Jill & John;

Islam is the religion of peace, therefore a Muslim could not possibly utter anything hateful – right?
commented 2016-09-30 18:06:09 -0400
A phobia is an irrational fear. Fear of islam is not irrational, therefore islamaphobia cannot exist.
commented 2016-09-30 17:01:13 -0400
How do we define their hatred of us, our religions, cultures and so on and what word can we use to label this hate and also lets criminalize that as well!!
commented 2016-09-30 16:57:41 -0400
Marxists on the move!!!
commented 2016-09-30 16:34:50 -0400
commented 2016-09-30 16:16:33 -0400
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM: 31,845 Attacks, 202,532 Killed, 283,558 Injured…. that we know of.