March 03, 2015

Obama's "deal will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It would all but guarantee that Iran gets those weapons, lots of them"

Marissa SemkiwArchive

Earlier today, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the U.S. Congress about the Iranian nuke situation, sending a clear message that Obama’s persistence in negotiating with the rogue regime is futile.

Obama is so desperate to sign a deal, any deal, even if it’s a bad deal, that he’s willing to make compromises on everything.

Recall that negotiations were going on in secret before their existence was eventually leaked in 2013. He’s extended talks twice past the original deadline set over a year ago. And each time, he makes more and more concessions, because he’s so desperate to sign an agreement.

If you ask me, one would be forgiven in thinking that Obama is perfectly willing to let Iran go nuclear. 

The Israelis are terrified, rightly so. The Iranian Mullahs talk openly of destroying Israel, the only democracy in the region and America’s longtime ally.

But let’s not be naïve: Iran is a threat to far more than just Israel. If they get the bomb, they’ll be the strongest country in the region.

Will Sunni Muslim regimes respond by going nuclear as well?  The Saudis – Iran’s major regional rival - reportedly bankrolled the Pakistani weapons program. Will they call in favours and acquire their own nuclear arms. Will Egypt go nuclear? What about Turkey? Obama says he’s against nuclear proliferation, but he could inadvertently be sparking a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

Make no mistake, Iran won’t hesitate to use its nuclear status to strong-arm other countries in the strategically crucial, energy rich Middle East. 

The consequences of signing this deal could be devastating.  Much of Congress understands this, as does Netanyahu.

I explain all the implications Obama's misguided deal would have for Israel and the rest of the region:

EARLIER: Ezra Levant has more on Netanyahu's historic speech.

GET INVOLVED in's 100% grassroots crowdfunding campaign and help us bring you more analysis like this.


You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-03-04 17:20:15 -0500
Mr. Vice President,

“It will be recorded that the distance of Hawaii from Japan makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks ago. During the intervening time, the Japanese government has deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace” Frankilin D. Roosevelt in his address to Congress , December 8th, 1941.
Now isn’t Obama’s and Kerry’s effort with Iran doomed to a much worse outcome, one that cannot even be imagined. Well that isn’t quite true. One cannot only envision , but foresee with clarity that Iran will utilize their new toy to dominate first ,the region and then the world through fear and intimidation. Mutually assured destruction , detente and other phrases are not in the playbook or lexicon of these fenatics.
Well Obama promised to shake hands with all the worst and he certainly is topping the list with these throwbacks to the 7th century. But we cannot accuse Obama of ignoring or failing to observe the teachings of history. To the contrary. His entire frame of reference was established by his father, a communist , a hater of in particular the Colonialists and capitalists. His early exposure to Islam has wharped his judgement. He feels compelled to right all the perceived “wrongs” : wrongs against blacks, Muslims , and a long list of other historical injustices.
But today and tomorrow? Well, it isn’t Japan that “has sought to deceive” . The Persians are playing a masterful game with a fool . Heck, these Persians are not even hiding their hole card. Everyone but Obama and his ship of fools sees the assured outcome.
Elections have consequences? Well that can go in the history books as quite the understatement.
All the phoney liberal and Democratic criticisms of Netanyahu’s position will be forgotten in mere days. But Prime Minister Netanyahu’s address is now entrenched in the Congressonal Records forever more , just as are the mighty words of Roosevelt .And that is the most salient and important point.
commented 2015-03-04 14:56:09 -0500
If there’s such a thing as “The Anti-Christ”, Obama is on a long list of names to whom that title can be ascribed.
commented 2015-03-04 14:49:59 -0500
Actually, it is “he” Richard. You can laugh you leftist head off, but remember it is YOUR side which is doing everything possible to destroy the values , traditions, moral direction and individual freedom of societies both near and far. Your “messiah”, is the undisputed world leader in accomplishing this task.

Most disturbingly, YOUR side is winning.

But remember this: When the Left wins, we ALL lose!
commented 2015-03-04 14:29:53 -0500
lmao, Carmen who quotes the bible and suspects Obama is the anti-christ talks about “sane severely normal people”. I’m guessing he/she believes such claims are “sane” and “severely normal”?

Seriously, the entertainment one can drive from Canada’s “rebels” is hilarious. I really wish Canada had a true, fact based, Canadian oriented news outlet for true conservative opinion instead what Canada has is a tabloid which doesn’t substantiate it’s claims, makes wild accusations, and where the only actual factual “news” is just copy/pasted from other news sources. All the “rebel” has to offer is horribly inaccurate inflammatory commentary which does nothing but create division amongst Canadians and discredits the true conservative message of freedom and liberty for all.

Once again it’s already been proven Netanyahu is a liar:

Here is an article from an American Jew describing the hardship of being a Jew that doesn’t support Israeli Zionism or Netanyahu’s speech from Isral’s own Haaretz:

The Rebel does all Canadians, and especially conservative Canadians a great disservice by omitting facts and replacing it with clearly biased factless drivel.
commented 2015-03-04 10:41:12 -0500
good lord, carmen. obama is the muslim anti-christ?
commented 2015-03-04 00:09:20 -0500
Saudi Arabia has agreed to let Israel use its air space to access Iran if it needs to act to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Neither does China want a nuclear Iran. Nor does Egypt. So although Netanyaho may not have a friend in pro-communist-caliphate Obama, he does not want for allies, including in Congress and among the American people quickly waking up to who Obama really is.

Israel has great intellectual property and security that its allies want to trade allegiance for so while Iran remains the biggest threat to peace in the middle east today, especially with Putin’s backing, it will not succeed to destroy Israel regardless of whatever deal Obama made with his international communist friends to do so.
commented 2015-03-03 23:18:30 -0500
Make no mistake… If Iran gets a nuke they WILL use it. Their ideology allows lying to infidels if it advances the cause. In this case their cause is the destruction of Israel. They believe their reward will come in the afterlife. Negotiating with someone who will never honour the deal and will accept, even welcome their own death, is pointless. The people of Iran are modern and educated. Their leadership are out of their frickin minds! Netanyahu is sending a clear message; do not accept a bad deal. It will not bring peace to the region. It will lead to massive death and destruction. Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.