Roy Cooper, the Democratic Governor of North Carolina, is calling on a judge to abolish the state's controversial "bathroom law" and replace it with HB 142, a pro-transgender policy which will give men the right to use women's bathrooms.
https://youtu.be/uq98wK4nY1s
Whereas the Consent Parties agree that Section 2 of H.B. 142 must be interpreted to mean that no executive agency, officer, employee, or agent thereof, may promulgate any regulation which prevents transgender people from using public facilities in accordance with their gender identity, nor subject transgender people to prosecution pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 114-11.6.
Whereas the Consent Parties further agree that any interpretation or application of Section 2 of H.B. 142 that bars, prohibits, blocks, deters, or impedes transgender people from using public facilities in accordance with their gender identity or subjects transgender people to arrest, prosecution, or criminal sanctions for doing so, raises serious federal-law concerns, including concerns over constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process, as well as other applicable federal statutes.
Leftists love to make this whole bathroom issue about civil rights, but it's really not about that at all. Instead, this is first and foremost an issue about security. Laws like this one are a slippery slope, as they make it impossible for women to close the door on men in their locker rooms and bathrooms. This makes it disturbingly easy for male sexual predators to force their way into the women's bathroom and then claim they are simply "transgender" when they are told to leave.
The dangers of laws like this were revealed once again this week, when a man who says he is a woman was arrested in Wyoming for molesting a 10 year-old girl in a public bathroom. How can parents feel safe allowing their little girls to use the bathroom when there could be sexual predators waiting for them in there?
In the end, most women who are actually transgender look feminine enough to use the women's room unchallenged with or without this law, so it's really of no use to them. The only thing this law does is open the door to sexual predators who can misuse it to assault girls more easily!
What do you think about this? Sound off in the comments section below.
ie: when someone doesn’t want their tax dollars funding Pride Parades, and suggests the organizers secure corporate sponsors or schedule a run weekend to pay for the costs without expecting a hand out from city council, that person is accused of being homophobic.
When another person points out to Justin Trudeau that honour killings and FGM are in fact barbaric, this person is called Islamophobic. When the government decides to allow convicted terrorists to keep their Canadian passport and refuse to deport them, citizens who object and protest are also called Islamophobic.
People who subscribe to social construct theory; have also insisted there is a gender continuum with dozens of genders and push for legislation to impose their ideology on people who see this as non-scientific. I call that binaryphobic.
Two genders, and in some cases, a person born having both male and female sex organs or other sexual characteristics.
Bill C-16 and Bill 89 – research them.
I reject the concept of a “normal” that is by its very nature, deliberately exclusionary to those who don’t meet arbitrarily defined parameters.
I don’t feel “shame” for things that are not shameful, including for not buying into those arbitrary parameters.
I donn’t feel my intelligence is wasted, although your attempt at a backstory is mildly amusing. Oh, and that’ Dr. Stephenson – I have a PhD. (but it’s not my actual surname).
“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 22 hours ago
Hey Andrew, surely you can figure out what I’m talking about. I’m just using leftist tactics on the left. They call everyone who isn’t on board with their ideology and legislative changes “phobic”.
I think we need to come up with a few more and use them! "
The problem is that the -phobic suffix is being applied to those being discriminated against. There’s nothing about inclusive policies that discriminate against heteronormative or cisgender individuals. Accepting others’ choices does not diminish your own.
Not “the anti Christ” but one who enjoys clever deceit and posturing to confuse the weak minded of the masses to assist in behaviour that will be their own undoing and convincing them it is for the better good.. whose better good you twisted deceitful pervert.. you connot be shamed therefore you have no morals.!l
Everyone plays their part leading to judgement day.. your obvious intelligence was a gift but you decided to waste it and let it fuel your tremendous ego instead of developing your potential.. Your egocentrical narcissistic personality stems from some emotional damage somewhere,somebody hurt you or abandoned you but whatever… that is addressing the weak side of your personality.. i’ve seen it happen to other intelligent women who loved to much and when their hearts got broken something happened and they turned inward to themselves becoming narcissistic and mean and contrairy.!! People like you believe they find strength in their emotional pain and while using their intellect to deliver twisted insanities and the game is making it sound believable to weak ears.
Shame on you but you have no shame..!!
And this shows that there are freaks who will take advantage of this and be harder to notice. Are you totally dense? Now keep deflecting and ignoring reality.
I think we need to come up with a few more and use them!
“…So, having established that it’s about bathrooms…” Your fat head is stuffed so full of lefty/liberal lies and BS that I think you ought to flush your head down the toilet – because you’re stinking the place up.
I mean, just exactly what is it you’re trying to pull here? You’re not fooling anyone with your fascist talking points and your other delusional lefty nonsense. Why don’t you go away and stop bothering everybody here.
Shoo fly.
Andrew boys will be in the company of other men in that bathroom. And current rules did not fail to prevent anything, where did you get that BS? "
Wyoming doesnt’ allow men into womens’ washrooms.
“It is important to note that the incident involving Martinez was not a result of allowing transgender people to use bathrooms that correspond to their gender identity.”
https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom
Tammie, what does “binaryphobic” even mean? If you want to live according to traditional roles, that’s entirely your prerogative and I fully support your right to do so. Accepting alternatives doesn’t diminish the original. The term does provide an interesting insight into the “culture wars”, especially where it creates victimhood where none exists.
“You weigh in about bathrooms & transgender agenda surrounding bathrooms, even when articles have nothing to with bathrooms. Double yawn!”
So, when there actually is an article about bathrooms and I see your name in the comments section, I skim it as you have posted about it ad nauseam. You really push the binaryphobic agenda whenever possible, bored to tears hearing your perspective on this.
Andrew, are you daft?
I already told you. "
You decided discussing bathrooms was not topical to a column about bathrooms. Your most obvious argument is specious for this reason, and there’s no clear secondary interpretation.
“Drew Wakariuk commented 3 hours ago
Andrew Stephenson you are saying making it acceptable will have no effect and it will make it harder for this to be noticed or prevented. "
And you’re telling me that somehow current rules will prevent it, while citing an instance where they failed to do just that?
No, I doubt boys are more capable of defending themselves. There’s very little difference in physical capacity of younger children until well into puberty.
Seriously, it is sub-lined “Rebel Staff”. Is there anyone who will step up and acknowledge writing this?
The article is intended to appeal to conservative Americans. It does not even pay lip service to Canadian readers.
Who wrote this item?
I already told you.
Andrew Stephenson you were saying?
”https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom">https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom
No one will notice.
"
Wyoming is not permissive about trans washroom use. So … these laws are therefore useless, and thus the rape argument is specious?
Are you OK with rapists using the guy’s bathrooms around young boys? Is that OK with you, or are you only worried about girls?
You weigh in about bathrooms & transgender agenda surrounding bathrooms, even when articles have nothing to with bathrooms. Double yawn! "
What’s the last word in the title of this article?
So, having established that it’s about bathrooms … what’s your point? Yawn, indeed.
https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom
No one will notice.
“How can parents feel safe allowing their little girls to use the bathroom when there could be sexual predators waiting for them in there?”
What about little boys? Just going to toss them to the pervs? The solution to creeps isn’t bathroom restrictions .. which as this Wyoming incident highlights … don’t work anyway. What is the solution? Who knows, but it’s not this.
Exactly, totally agree Mike.
What the heck is in the water these days that the left are drinking or is it something they are smoking or snorting?