October 20, 2017

Allow Men In Women's Bathrooms, NC Governor Tells Judge

Rebel Staff

Roy Cooper, the Democratic Governor of North Carolina, is calling on a judge to abolish the state's controversial "bathroom law" and replace it with HB 142, a pro-transgender policy which will give men the right to use women's bathrooms.

https://youtu.be/uq98wK4nY1s

Whereas the Consent Parties agree that Section 2 of H.B. 142 must be interpreted to mean that no executive agency, officer, employee, or agent thereof, may promulgate any regulation which prevents transgender people from using public facilities in accordance with their gender identity, nor subject transgender people to prosecution pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 114-11.6. 

Whereas the Consent Parties further agree that any interpretation or application of Section 2 of H.B. 142 that bars, prohibits, blocks, deters, or impedes transgender people from using public facilities in accordance with their gender identity or subjects transgender people to arrest, prosecution, or criminal sanctions for doing so, raises serious federal-law concerns, including concerns over constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process, as well as other applicable federal statutes. 

Leftists love to make this whole bathroom issue about civil rights, but it's really not about that at all. Instead, this is first and foremost an issue about security. Laws like this one are a slippery slope, as they make it impossible for women to close the door on men in their locker rooms and bathrooms. This makes it disturbingly easy for male sexual predators to force their way into the women's bathroom and then claim they are simply "transgender" when they are told to leave.

The dangers of laws like this were revealed once again this week, when a man who says he is a woman was arrested in Wyoming for molesting a 10 year-old girl in a public bathroom. How can parents feel safe allowing their little girls to use the bathroom when there could be sexual predators waiting for them in there?

In the end, most women who are actually transgender look feminine enough to use the women's room unchallenged with or without this law, so it's really of no use to them. The only thing this law does is open the door to sexual predators who can misuse it to assault girls more easily!

What do you think about this? Sound off in the comments section below. 

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-10-24 04:20:09 -0400
Is that a small p in the PhD.?? The truly explains a lot to how fucked up your nature is because I dated two women of academia one was a PhD in sociology and criminology and the others was a masters the tought school as a teacher to middle grades.. we are both burnt out… They have both been on sabbatical’s and one is on a permanent medical disability… They were both freakishly skinny and diagnosed with anorexia… Both have spent extensive time and with psychologists and psychiatrists for mental health issues.. The PhD is a washed out burnt out drug addicted alcoholic failed academic who really does believe the grass is blue in the sky is green.. All products of academia are Loopy.. and they all like to throw the fancy words at you as it makes them feel superior when they themselves haven’t got a clue what they are or you’re talking about.. The higher one goes up the academia ladder it seems the greater the price one has to pay in their ability to think rationally and function as a normal human being. And like most PhD’s they are also proud of their academic achievement that they can’t wait to tell you what they have their doctorate in and I don’t believe you’re a PhD for a minute because you would’ve shared that information instantly… Ms. Stevens you’re not only a liar and a coward and a woman who hides behind a man’s name which supports what I have to say about the products of academia but you’re also useless and you are of a parasitic nature and you cannot live without a host to feed off as you are in capable of making a living by yourself.!!
commented 2017-10-22 13:24:15 -0400
Andrew, phobic is used all the time by leftist regressives and Islamists to characterize those who don’t conform to their ideology.
ie: when someone doesn’t want their tax dollars funding Pride Parades, and suggests the organizers secure corporate sponsors or schedule a run weekend to pay for the costs without expecting a hand out from city council, that person is accused of being homophobic.
When another person points out to Justin Trudeau that honour killings and FGM are in fact barbaric, this person is called Islamophobic. When the government decides to allow convicted terrorists to keep their Canadian passport and refuse to deport them, citizens who object and protest are also called Islamophobic.

People who subscribe to social construct theory; have also insisted there is a gender continuum with dozens of genders and push for legislation to impose their ideology on people who see this as non-scientific. I call that binaryphobic.
Two genders, and in some cases, a person born having both male and female sex organs or other sexual characteristics.

Bill C-16 and Bill 89 – research them.
commented 2017-10-22 12:48:22 -0400
Leviticus " you ar against everything normal and moral behaviour everywhere where good comes before political slant.. You are an anti-Christ…."

I reject the concept of a “normal” that is by its very nature, deliberately exclusionary to those who don’t meet arbitrarily defined parameters.

I don’t feel “shame” for things that are not shameful, including for not buying into those arbitrary parameters.

I donn’t feel my intelligence is wasted, although your attempt at a backstory is mildly amusing. Oh, and that’ Dr. Stephenson – I have a PhD. (but it’s not my actual surname).

“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 22 hours ago
Hey Andrew, surely you can figure out what I’m talking about. I’m just using leftist tactics on the left. They call everyone who isn’t on board with their ideology and legislative changes “phobic”.
I think we need to come up with a few more and use them! "

The problem is that the -phobic suffix is being applied to those being discriminated against. There’s nothing about inclusive policies that discriminate against heteronormative or cisgender individuals. Accepting others’ choices does not diminish your own.
commented 2017-10-22 03:17:08 -0400
If there really is any “justice” left in this world, one can only hope that Governor Roy Cooper has a daughter or granddaughter who gets “visited” by by one of these perversions in a public washroom one day… Until that happens, too many members of the legal “profession” just cannot seem to grasp reality…
commented 2017-10-21 20:56:31 -0400
Whatever possesses you Andrew or should I say Ms. Stevenson is evil and sick… the woman who hides behind a man’s name and claims she does it for self defence online.. the internet… where only pretend aggression exists, where the worst thing anybody can do to you is call you names … What about the real world where real aggression exists, were real laws, bad laws affect the daily lives and the safety of real people in the real world, Who may not be able to defend themselves against the kind of physical aggression that you find so terrifying in the pretend world of the Internet …. You are a threat to young girls and women everywhere.. you ar against everything normal and moral behaviour everywhere where good comes before political slant.. You are an anti-Christ….
Not “the anti Christ” but one who enjoys clever deceit and posturing to confuse the weak minded of the masses to assist in behaviour that will be their own undoing and convincing them it is for the better good.. whose better good you twisted deceitful pervert.. you connot be shamed therefore you have no morals.!l
Everyone plays their part leading to judgement day.. your obvious intelligence was a gift but you decided to waste it and let it fuel your tremendous ego instead of developing your potential.. Your egocentrical narcissistic personality stems from some emotional damage somewhere,somebody hurt you or abandoned you but whatever… that is addressing the weak side of your personality.. i’ve seen it happen to other intelligent women who loved to much and when their hearts got broken something happened and they turned inward to themselves becoming narcissistic and mean and contrairy.!! People like you believe they find strength in their emotional pain and while using their intellect to deliver twisted insanities and the game is making it sound believable to weak ears.
Shame on you but you have no shame..!!
commented 2017-10-21 18:16:44 -0400
Andrew Stephenson i never said it was , YOU SAID NO ONE WOULD NOTICE!! REMEMBER???
And this shows that there are freaks who will take advantage of this and be harder to notice. Are you totally dense? Now keep deflecting and ignoring reality.
commented 2017-10-21 14:09:17 -0400
Hey Andrew, surely you can figure out what I’m talking about. I’m just using leftist tactics on the left. They call everyone who isn’t on board with their ideology and legislative changes “phobic”.
I think we need to come up with a few more and use them!
commented 2017-10-21 13:20:41 -0400
ANDREW STEPHENSON commented 17 hours ago
“…So, having established that it’s about bathrooms…” Your fat head is stuffed so full of lefty/liberal lies and BS that I think you ought to flush your head down the toilet – because you’re stinking the place up.

I mean, just exactly what is it you’re trying to pull here? You’re not fooling anyone with your fascist talking points and your other delusional lefty nonsense. Why don’t you go away and stop bothering everybody here.
Shoo fly.
commented 2017-10-21 13:07:53 -0400
“Drew Wakariuk commented 9 hours ago
Andrew boys will be in the company of other men in that bathroom. And current rules did not fail to prevent anything, where did you get that BS? "

Wyoming doesnt’ allow men into womens’ washrooms.
“It is important to note that the incident involving Martinez was not a result of allowing transgender people to use bathrooms that correspond to their gender identity.”

https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom

Tammie, what does “binaryphobic” even mean? If you want to live according to traditional roles, that’s entirely your prerogative and I fully support your right to do so. Accepting alternatives doesn’t diminish the original. The term does provide an interesting insight into the “culture wars”, especially where it creates victimhood where none exists.
commented 2017-10-21 08:51:25 -0400
Oh Andrew, once again you lack discernment.
“You weigh in about bathrooms & transgender agenda surrounding bathrooms, even when articles have nothing to with bathrooms. Double yawn!”
So, when there actually is an article about bathrooms and I see your name in the comments section, I skim it as you have posted about it ad nauseam. You really push the binaryphobic agenda whenever possible, bored to tears hearing your perspective on this.
commented 2017-10-21 04:06:17 -0400
If a man stood guard in a womens washroom to protect them from freaks would you still be all for them being there? And do not act like this will be limited to trans , as it means all men will be allowed. When this stuff applies to affirmative action i will support it more, but right now it only makes perversion more acceptable.
commented 2017-10-21 04:03:41 -0400
Andrew boys will be in the company of other men in that bathroom. And current rules did not fail to prevent anything, where did you get that BS?
commented 2017-10-21 04:01:44 -0400
Andrew no i am saying new rules will make it much worse. If someone had seen these 2 go in together they may have taken action, that would not happen under the new law which is only for a small number of people compared to a large number. What part of that do you not understand? And why do you not care that many women do not want a man in their washroom. I thought you were all about choice?
commented 2017-10-21 00:01:24 -0400
“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 3 hours ago
Andrew, are you daft?
I already told you. "

You decided discussing bathrooms was not topical to a column about bathrooms. Your most obvious argument is specious for this reason, and there’s no clear secondary interpretation.

“Drew Wakariuk commented 3 hours ago
Andrew Stephenson you are saying making it acceptable will have no effect and it will make it harder for this to be noticed or prevented. "

And you’re telling me that somehow current rules will prevent it, while citing an instance where they failed to do just that?

No, I doubt boys are more capable of defending themselves. There’s very little difference in physical capacity of younger children until well into puberty.
commented 2017-10-20 23:42:00 -0400
Who wrote this article?

Seriously, it is sub-lined “Rebel Staff”. Is there anyone who will step up and acknowledge writing this?

The article is intended to appeal to conservative Americans. It does not even pay lip service to Canadian readers.

Who wrote this item?
commented 2017-10-20 21:28:40 -0400
Andrew this will make it easier for freaks to do this and if someone prevents a rape the rapist will cry about it being a hate crime. what if women do not want this, do you even care about them or you only care about people with mental health problems i thought you believed in women having a choice, this is not that. There was a pretty open nightclub on Whyte Ave some years back, they had mens, womens ,a and a mixed washroom, what the hell is wrong with that? Oh yeah, freaks do not get to force themselves on others.
commented 2017-10-20 21:14:58 -0400
Andrew Stephenson you are saying making it acceptable will have no effect and it will make it harder for this to be noticed or prevented. And you are the side that is soft on crime. A boy is more able to defend himself in case you missed it. You are the one who wants to give them more access , NOT ME!
commented 2017-10-20 20:58:43 -0400
Andrew, are you daft?
I already told you.
commented 2017-10-20 19:53:23 -0400
“Drew Wakariuk commented 1 hour ago
Andrew Stephenson you were saying?
”https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom">https://www.therebel.media/transsexual_arrested_for_allegedly_raping_girl_in_bathroom

No one will notice.
"
Wyoming is not permissive about trans washroom use. So … these laws are therefore useless, and thus the rape argument is specious?

Are you OK with rapists using the guy’s bathrooms around young boys? Is that OK with you, or are you only worried about girls?
commented 2017-10-20 19:51:40 -0400
“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 1 hour ago
You weigh in about bathrooms & transgender agenda surrounding bathrooms, even when articles have nothing to with bathrooms. Double yawn! "

What’s the last word in the title of this article?

So, having established that it’s about bathrooms … what’s your point? Yawn, indeed.
commented 2017-10-20 18:48:11 -0400
You weigh in about bathrooms & transgender agenda surrounding bathrooms, even when articles have nothing to with bathrooms. Double yawn!
commented 2017-10-20 17:57:36 -0400
You don’t think a column about bathrooms is an appropriate place to comment about bathrooms?
commented 2017-10-20 15:16:08 -0400
Andrew Stephenson , another worthless post about bathrooms. Yawn!
commented 2017-10-20 14:50:26 -0400
This law is completely unenforceable anyway. Trans individuals already use the bathrooms regularly without being detected. It’s cute that Cons think that it doesn’t happen right under their noses already.

“How can parents feel safe allowing their little girls to use the bathroom when there could be sexual predators waiting for them in there?”

What about little boys? Just going to toss them to the pervs? The solution to creeps isn’t bathroom restrictions .. which as this Wyoming incident highlights … don’t work anyway. What is the solution? Who knows, but it’s not this.
commented 2017-10-20 14:07:45 -0400
Life was a lot simpler when their were just Straights and Queers. Do not intend to offend anybody but with all these odd signs on public washrooms, it is a lot simpler to just go and Pee up against a fence.
commented 2017-10-20 13:28:13 -0400
Hyacinth, who knows!
commented 2017-10-20 13:05:04 -0400
“How in the world does ANYBODY gain from letting men in the ladies’ room? Show me one single benefit.”

Exactly, totally agree Mike.
What the heck is in the water these days that the left are drinking or is it something they are smoking or snorting?
commented 2017-10-20 12:48:08 -0400
How in the world does ANYBODY gain from letting men in the ladies’ room? Show me one single benefit.
commented 2017-10-20 12:10:59 -0400
Its a ridiculous idea, but then again, allowing women reporters into men’s locker rooms after professional games is also ridiculous. When will men be allowed into women’s locker rooms to interview them right out of the shower and while dressing as happens to male athletes?