July 13, 2018

Peter Strzok humiliated himself before Congress

John CardilloRebel Host | Off The Cuff

Disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok’s testimony to Congress embarrassed Strzok himself, the FBI, DOJ, and most importantly the Democratic Party. Democrats were seen for the partisan pro-police state hacks they are, putting obfuscation and obstruction before transparency and justice. I break it down.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-07-18 13:11:48 -0400
Ted, there are 48,000 sealed indictments in the US which is astonishing. Huber has a team of over 400 people. Yes, he’s an Obama appointee and who better to bring about the evidence and charges against every swamp rat in DC? An Obama appointee who won’t appear to be driven by revenge.
commented 2018-07-17 01:58:35 -0400

That’s great news, if Huber is the real deal. But the fact of him being an Obama appointee gives me the shudders. Time will tell, but I won’t be a bit surprised if nothing much comes of his investigation. But if he is the real deal, it will be a show worth watching, that’s for sure. I hope it won’t be much longer before we see it.
commented 2018-07-16 13:01:27 -0400
You’re welcome, Tad. I agree with all you said. However, a second special counsel is not necessary and indeed would take much too long to bring the criminals to justice. Rather, Jeff Sessions had appointed U.S Attorney John Huber last Fall. Huber has a very large staff of hundreds who are busy investigating everything.


Expect the crap to hit the fan just prior to the mid-terms in November. Enjoy the show. :-)
commented 2018-07-16 05:37:45 -0400
I watched some more of the Senate hearings and it came out the Strzok was the lead investigator on the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Presumably he would have made the decisions regarding immunity from prosecution being given to Hillary’s staff for no good reason, and all other issues regarding the investigation. It’s safe to say that Hillary had nothing to worry about with Strzok as lead investigator. He was a big fan of hers and hated Trump, and wanted her to the the next POTUS. The fix was in for her, no doubt about it.
commented 2018-07-15 19:13:21 -0400
D. Millard,

Thanks for digging that video up; it couldn’t be more obvious that Strzok wanted to protect Hillary Clinton from being indicted on a felony statute (because he wanted her to (a) not become a convicted criminal, and (b) be elected as POTUS), and that is why the wording was changed. In light of his emails that have made clear his clear bias toward Hillary, his denials on this matter ring very hollow indeed. I would really like the Republicans to bore in on this, and on why the FBI gave Hillary’s staff immunity from prosecution when they hadn’t given the FBI any reason to do so. Clearly the FBI wanted to also protect Hillary from any info her staff would have provided, had there been a real investigation of Her email shenanigans and other matters such as the many enormous financial contributions that were made to the Clinton Foundation by players like Russia, which was allowed by her to purchase 20% of America’s uranium production and ship it out of the country. This entire so-called ‘FBI investigation’ was clearly a sham, rigged to protect Hillary from criminal prosecution and to cover up the truth about her actions. What was Strzok’s role, if any, in all of that? He appears to have had a key role in this ‘investigation’. The Republicans should be focusing on getting the truth about that to the American people so that the DoJ is forced to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate it. That special prosecutor should be appointed not by the corrupt FBI’s pal Rod Rosenstein, but by Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
commented 2018-07-15 10:09:29 -0400
Ted Tadright, thank you for taking my word for it. :-) I searched high and low for a video of Strzok admitting to that wording change, and found one:


Unfortunately, it cuts off before he gets to the reasoning why the change was done for Comey’s benefit. And you’re right, of course. ‘Gross negligence’ was they key to charging her. You can hear Strzok say that it was a group of FBI attorneys who discussed this wording change.

Andy Neimers, yes the crooked bitch is still out there shooting off her useless filthy mouth. I can not wait until she is shut up behind bars once and for all.
commented 2018-07-15 02:16:27 -0400
Amen, Ted Tadright, Amen… As I’ve said before, NOT putting Hillary in jail, if even for a symbolic 30 days, would always be a blight on the American justice system from now on… And the bitch is still out there on the speaking circuit without a face punch…
commented 2018-07-14 17:33:47 -0400
D. Millard,

If that’s true (I take your word for it), then that is extremely interesting, because the original wording (“gross negligence”) was the same as the statute that applies to her activity is written, meaning that Hillary would have had to be charged with a criminal offence by the DoJ if the wording had not been changed by Strzok.

So much for Strzok’s claim that there is no evidence that his extreme pro-Hillary, anti-Trump bias influenced the way he conducted his role in that investigation. That change resulted in her avoiding prosecution by the DoJ. I wonder what role, if any, he might have had in the FBI handing out immunity like candy on Halloween to Hillary’s staff? This so-called investigation was clearly rigged to keep Hillary from being prosecuted.
commented 2018-07-14 14:53:36 -0400
An arrogant Democrat useful idiot. The kind of person you’re glad to see do a face plant.
commented 2018-07-14 09:06:55 -0400
Tammie, I’m impatient too and it’s frustrating. Things are happening but you know we won’t know most of it. There are some horrific crimes that should go from dark to light. These people are SICK! We have to wait for this battle between good and evil to end.

Ted Tadright, It came out in the hearing that the wording from ‘gross negligence’ to ‘extremely careless’ was done on Strzok’s computer and he’s the only one who had access to it. I believe he said the wording was changed because of how they wanted Comey to come across (something to that effect.) But it was done by Strzok.
commented 2018-07-14 02:49:10 -0400
Which means the Democrats, going into the 2018 mid-term elections, are scrambling as to who they believe, who is going to lead them, and how far “commie” they want to be really dragged…
commented 2018-07-14 02:46:05 -0400
Any fair minded person who listened to those hours of tap-dancing would have concluded that “political bias” was indeed at work… The Democrats on that committee throwing “chaff” into the air was just too obvious to ignore… Unless, of course, you were a member of the lame stream media still trying to spin the too, too tired Russia collusion B.S…. Fortunately, the most recent opinion polls, show most Americans, even Democrats, are tiring of this “guerrilla theatre” tactic…
commented 2018-07-13 23:36:17 -0400
If only the Republicans would get on their game properly. Why did nobody ask Strzok about his role in the faux Hillary Clinton investigation? For example, Strzok claimed in the Senate hearing that none of his pro-Hillary, anti-Trump bias (which he clearly had, but denied even having) had been acted out by him in anything that he had done as an FBI investigator. So who changed the wording of James Comey’s ‘Hillary skates’ announcement from “grossly negligent” (or “gross negligence”) to “extremely careless” (or “extreme carelessness”), in reference to some of her actions, which changes effectively protected her from being prosecuted. Was it Strzok?, If so, that would be very telling indeed. Why were many of Hillary’s staff members given immunity, apparently in exchange for nothing on their part, completely contradicting the normal procedure for such an investigation and having the appearance of being done to protect them from possible prosecution or possibly having to testify against Hillary? You could say that this so-called investigation had a really bad SMELL. What was Strzok’s role in it? Was he in it up to his eyebrows? The Republicans better start asking some real questions.
commented 2018-07-13 22:59:31 -0400
Saul Alinsky must be squirming amidst the flames.
commented 2018-07-13 21:01:29 -0400
D. Millard, I agree, Huber has been busy indeed.

I guess I’m impatient and want page 294 to finally be introduced.

412Anon has been tracking all sorts of interesting facts and building graphs; there have been thousands of arrests….
It’s a precision process and the “stage has been set”.
commented 2018-07-13 18:33:25 -0400
I watched almost all of that asshat yesterday. He admitted he never thought that those text messages would become public. You’d think with his former position in the FBI, he would know that all of that information could be recovered. No he was sure it would never be public because Crooked Hillary was going to win the election and none of this crap would ever be known.

Tammie, he refused to agree to give Congress his personal texts and I’m sure that between those and the others that we have yet to see from his work phone, there is something. The President has it all.

Tammie, I thought for a quick minute that someone would address page 294 but it didn’t happen. Not yet. It will all come out. Huber must be very busy…
commented 2018-07-13 18:15:07 -0400
I was watching it on Fox yesterday and he acted like a real A hole. Clearly he come to congress to be combative with Republicans.
commented 2018-07-13 17:51:04 -0400
Why is the Congressional Oversight Committee not addressing page 294 of the IG report?
commented 2018-07-13 16:48:40 -0400
I am wondering if any of the texts contained talk about assassination…what did the “missing” texts truly say? Wasn’t it the NSA that had to recover these texts?
commented 2018-07-13 16:43:36 -0400
I am reposting from another thread. Democratic Party imploding, check out #WalkAway movement. People are starting to wake up to the fact the party is built on a foundation of lies. Pitting American against American. Creating division and distraction from their real goals…to bring down America and enslave the country for Globalists who are the NWO.

TAMMIE PUTINSKI-ZANDBELT commented 6 hours ago
John Cardillo uploaded this message on Twitter this morning

Liberal logic decipher:

Gun control – Good
Abortion control – Bad

More taxes – Good
You keeping more of your $ – Bad

Cops – Bad
Criminals – Good

Russia – Bad
Germany enriching Russia – Good

NATO – Good
NATO members paying up – Bad

Illegal – Good
Legal – Bad