December 08, 2016

Opinion: We need political leaders, not blind followers, when it comes to climate change

Tim BallRebel Columnist

Many people, including my wife, ask why I continue to fight for the truth about the greatest deception in history, the claim that humans are causing global warming.

The answer is simple; I don’t want any politician to be able to say they weren’t told.

I have written a multitude of articles in every medium possible, published books, done countless radio and TV interviews, and given hundreds of public lectures.

Over the last 40 years of watching the global warming deception unfold, I kept thinking something or someone would appear to expose the entire thing. It needed an event or person who could go to the heart of the problem that was established and firmly protected within the bureaucracy of government.

I watched the Chapter Eight debacle, the leaked emails, and the failed Kyoto Protocol come and go, but the juggernaut kept rolling.

Two disparate events revived my optimism for truth and common sense.

It began about eight years ago with the election of Barack Obama and with questions from Australian Malcolm Roberts, a retired engineer and businessman. Obama concealed who he was enough to exploit the goodwill of the average American who, in their search for equality, believed it was time for an African American President.

Roberts contacted me to help establish a group called the Galileo Movement. Later Roberts broached the idea of asking for empirical evidence that humans were causing global warming. This culminated in his running for office under a new Australian Party banner – One Nation.

His campaign as the senator from Queensland was successful, and his maiden speech started the search for empirical evidence. It is, to my knowledge, the first open challenge to the bureaucrats who control the global warming agenda and effectively dictate policy to the politicians.

Roberts challenged the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) to produce empirical evidence for global warming. Actual data with accompanying evidence of the cause and effect, not computer model generations.

They responded with a report that provided nothing. They then presented English TV celebrity Brian Cox who showed a graph of temperature increase. He didn’t know the graph was not empirical evidence because it did not explain the cause and effect. Worse, he didn’t know that the graph was fraudulently adjusted to accentuate the temperature increase. This information was available from the web site of Tony Heller, but Cox didn’t do his research.

I was invited to visit Australia by Senator Roberts and participate in a public presentation with Tony Heller. He showed how NASA GISS and others altered the historic record to accentuate the warming and to eliminate the cold spell from 1940 to 1980. I then followed him by asking the question: Why would scientists alter the record in such a way?

While in Australia, the second event occurred that indicates that the deception on global warming is doomed. Donald Trump got elected, as I predicted publicly almost from the start of his run for office. He, like the One Nation Party, ignored the traditional politics of socialism and conservatism and appealed to regional sentiments.

Brad Wall did the same thing in Saskatchewan and Quebec did it years ago with the Parti Quebecois. Saskatchewan is a good example of the conflicts that regionalism creates. For decades’ people voted conservative in Federal elections but NDP in provincial elections. These are two fundamentally different political views entertained by the same person – a dual personality voter.

Trump had to run as a Republican, but with his slogan “Make America Great Again” he effectively ran as the American Party candidate. He is not a politician, so the intellectuals and political pundits derisively call him a populist. Somehow in their twisted thinking listening to what the majority want is undemocratic.

Because of the Australian efforts, Senator Roberts, Tony Heller, and I were invited to Washington to present our work to Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI). He is charged with dealing with the EPA over-regulations and climate change. This will also involve the US withdrawing from the corrupted political fiasco that is the UN climate program, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Scientific deceptions were deliberately created to mislead the public and push their leaders into creating completely unnecessary policies. The claim is 97 per cent of scientists agree. The reality is 97 per cent of scientists never looked at the IPCC Reports. As Emeritus Professor of physics, the late Hal Lewis wrote in withdrawing from the American Physical Society in October 2010:

"The global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist."

German meteorologist and physicist Klaus-Eckart Puls explained his experience:

“Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”

Maurice Strong set up the AGW deception through the IPCC. It was peopled by bureaucrats of the national weather offices of every member nation of the UN through the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). He knew politicians wouldn’t challenge them and it was easy to marginalize the few who did.

To my knowledge Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, was the only world leader who spoke out. His book with the marvellous title "Blue Planet in Green Shackles: What is Endangered: Climate or Freedom" says it all. They used global warming to enslave the world.

Now, Senator Malcolm Robert has publicly exposed the bureaucrats as lackeys of the plan. With Trump’s election, we have a convergence that will finally expose the lies and deceptions.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-12-20 14:38:54 -0500
I was around in the seventy.s back then we were all going to freeze to death. yup global cooling would cause an ice age.
commented 2016-12-19 19:39:38 -0500
Members of the man made global warming cult are legion and will be difficult to deprogramme. The cult leaders will continue to push out the drop dead date and will continue to point to every type of extreme weather as proof of their theory. The costs of radical enviromentalism may be the shock people need to reconsider their belief systems.
commented 2016-12-12 08:34:47 -0500
How will we know that the carbon tax has worked? The starry eyed leftists claim it is the answer to all our problems. Barak Obama said we have too many weather(climatic) events so I ask how many droughts, floods, storms etc are acceptable and how many are not? The Paris Climate Conference set a 2 degree celsius reduction in global temperature by—get this— 2080. Yes friends 64 years from now when everyone reading this will be dead and so will most of their kids. Once again no consequences for being wrong.
commented 2016-12-10 14:03:53 -0500
What we are up against is something that seems to be branded on the human soul…a belief that a wrathfull diety is immanently going to punish us for eating shitting reproducing farting sneezing and stealing fire. So with the Frankfart School it is Gaia the man hating earth goddess of the Roman Vestal Virgins.

Nobody reads scientific journals. I am willing to bet that even the “peer review” skimmed and speed read that hypnotic sleep inducing BORING crap…and NOBODY reads that stuff unless some professor obliges you to read certain chapters in preparation for a lecture…and even then few students actually do.

And NOBODY who believes in global warming actually formed that view by readin scientific journals. They read alarmist crap written by JOURNALISTS….and we all know how reliable THAT source is.
commented 2016-12-09 01:48:35 -0500
Ron Joseph that is not ice, those are earth killing carbon encapsulated polar vortexes which can only be destroyed by a carbon tax.
commented 2016-12-09 00:17:40 -0500
The photo shows Ice in the Arctic; Al Gore predicted that it would be gone by 2010.
commented 2016-12-08 23:41:15 -0500
I will support bread Trost as well..
commented 2016-12-08 23:19:47 -0500
What a wonderful world it would be if the climate hoax was crushed once and for all. Suzuki wants to lock up deniers? Wouldn’t it be wonderful if all the liars who have profited and expected to continue to profit by perpetuating this lie, on the backs of the populace, such as saint Suzuki, Gore, DiCaprio etc. were the ones locked up.
commented 2016-12-08 19:33:26 -0500
I just saw on the news that they flicked on the Christmas Lights on Parliament tonight. Is that not hypocritical? They would fail my challenge:

On that note, we all need to keep trying to spread the message that Tim and others are spreading. Here is my story " From There to Here":
commented 2016-12-08 18:09:09 -0500
I will support Brad Trost.
commented 2016-12-08 17:00:23 -0500
And Brad Trost is where my support will go.
commented 2016-12-08 14:56:40 -0500
Tim, why limit the question to “when it comes to climate change”? Why not ask it about a whole host of questions of which they are equally guilty?
commented 2016-12-08 13:52:55 -0500
Trudeau and his Sidekicks Notley and Wynne, are all well aware of the fact that Global Warming, created by Man, is so infinitesimal that it has no noticeable effect on Climate Change.
In their minds, the General Publics opinions do not count, Small minds with the power of office behind them, tend to think this way.

I would say to to them, “It is time to change your ways, Canadians are beginning to wake up to your scams”.

Trudeau imagines that with the importation of Muslim’s, he will never loose another Election. I would say to him, "If you go down to the woods today, be prepared for a big surprise, You are becoming the laughing stock of the World.

How long will it be before the Terrible Triplets Tax Canada on Oxygen?
commented 2016-12-08 13:22:50 -0500
97% of global warming scientists agree that if they didn’t agree, 97% of scientists would lose their funding.
commented 2016-12-08 13:21:36 -0500
How many politicians or environmentalists (or scientists) or trolls that have used the oft cited phrase “97% of scientists”, have actually read the original source of the survey; the Doran paper?
The Doran paper has been justifiably criticized by many, whose heads are not in the sand, where a survey of 10,256 with 3,146 respondents was whittled down to 75 out of 77 “expert” active climate researchers (by throwing out over three thousand dissident responses) to give the 97% figure.
commented 2016-12-08 12:41:08 -0500
“Climate change” was never about saving the planet – it is about control of people’s lives. Agenda 21 makes no bones about this.

The basic tenets of Environmentalism and Communism are so much the same that they are indistinguishable. They are:

- Take away property rights and force people into densely-packed, Stalinist style “human anthills”.
- Take away freedom of movement, other than government-controlled “public transit”.
- Dachas and limousines for the Party elite, poverty and bread lines for the masses.
- Brainwash ’em early in State “education”. Tolerate no dissent.
- Destroy the middle class (aka “Kulaks”). A population that is beaten down by the battle to merely survive will have no time or energy to think heretical thoughts.
- Purge the population. It keeps the peasants in line.
- Individuality is verboten. Your only value is as a member of “the village”.

We have been approaching this issue all wrong – scientific arguments will not sway a population that measures its thought patterns in “Tweets”. The only way to kill the “climate change” lie is to put it in simple terms that the sheeple will understand – their pocketbook and their standard of living…
commented 2016-12-08 12:40:50 -0500
The fact the global warming cheerleaders changed the debate from “global warming” to “climate change” showed to me that they started with an assumption and were willing to twist the facts to fit that assumption. There is as much credibility as a huckster pushing around a cart from town to town selling the cure to baldness.
commented 2016-12-08 12:15:38 -0500
Excellent article, Tim.

I hope you are correct that the Global Warming scam is finally being debunked and the theft that it is.

I as well have hope that Trump will set a few things straight.