April 02, 2015

OPP report into Parliament Hill terror attack to remain secret

Brian LilleyArchive

A review conducted by the Ontario Provincial Police into security on Parliament Hill during last October's terror attack will remain secret, for now.

The Toronto Star reports that the OPP have delivered two reports to Royal Canadian Mounted Police Commissioner Bob Paulson and House of Commons Speaker Andrew Scheer, one on events inside the Parliament buildings and one outside.

The OPP say that it is not up to them but those they delivered the reports to, to decide if they will be made public.

While details have not been released The Star describes what it claims confidential sources have told them about the final moments of terrorist, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau.

From the time he entered Parliament and shot one parliamentary guard inside the main doors, to when he lay dead, just under two harrowing minutes had elapsed. Although wounded, Zehaf-Bibeau fired off another shot that missed guards and police advancing on him down the Hall of Honour. Security forces had shot him and he had trouble raising his gun.

Zehaf-Bibeau died moments later in a hail of bullets fired by then Sgt-at-Arms Kevin Vickers and an unidentified officer.

Several changes to Parliament Hill security have been made since the attack including giving the RCMP oversight over security inside and outside of the buildings.

Previously security in the Parliament buildings was a shared jurisdiction while the Mounties looked after external security.

What do you think? Should this information remain secret? Have your say in the comments.

JOIN TheRebel.media for more news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

Who are Canada's radical Muslim leaders? FIND OUT and fight back at CanadianJihad.ca

READ Brian Lilley's book CBC Exposed -- It's been called "the political book of the year."

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-04-06 14:25:51 -0400
I meant helping or not helping Assad.
commented 2015-04-05 22:38:52 -0400
Going into Syria isn’t about helping or not helping Syria. Its about getting a handle on ISIS.
commented 2015-04-05 14:22:11 -0400
I still don’t buy what you are selling, Stu.
Glad you are enjoying the free speech
Makes you proud to be a Canadian don’t it?
commented 2015-04-05 12:54:17 -0400
Liza. my past job has nothing to do which my connecting the dots and I NEVER claimed it to be so.
All wars are started with lies. All false flags are lies. My question to you is why are we in Syria? Have they attacked the USA or us or any other NATO country? We are there because the US’s army (ISIS) is there and we know from many reports that the US trained this mercenary army in Jordan (20,000 of them) and has private and drug money to finance it. Syria did not ask for help in fighting this army. Syria could easily have destroyed this army in a few weeks. ISIS always shows up where the Americans want to be.
If you remember, Liza Syria had elections not long ago where a vast majority voted to keep Assad as president. The election was overseen by independent observers and was called a free and open election by Jinny Carter himself. So the Syrians want Assad to stay.
What the US wants is the ability to run a pipeline from Israel through Syria and Iran and into Europe carrying new found Israeli oil sold for in American dollars. This will not happen if the current governments stay in place, As a side note, a huge oil reserve was discovered off the coast of Gaza recently as well
The war on terrorism was the pretense for entering Syria and bombing its infra structure and oil facilities.We are there because Goldman Sachs controls our central bank since 1974 thanks to Trudeau. They make big money off the petrodollar, wars and through national debts. Harper is now a puppet of the Americans with no room for independent action – think Ukraine.
As a result of this phoney war you can now be legally charged for just thinking about committing a crime which is totally against common law rules where actions steak louder than words.
Seeing the dots, connecting them and then comparing the results is how we get to the real truth and that will more likely than not be contrary to the official story.
I get the official story from reading the Globe and Mail and the Ottawa Citizen and then read newspapers from around the world to get real news about world and Canadian events, I do not watch Canadian news or TV because of the skewed bias of the presstitutes – the worst being the CBC which makes up 1/2 of the parliamentary press gallery.
I’m at the Rebel because my posts are not changed – so far. They have been edited by the CBC and CTV.
commented 2015-04-05 08:23:34 -0400
Liza I cannot believe you are holding to the official report. If your job depends on it then quit. Because that report is wrong. If anyone believes in is what happened then God help us.
commented 2015-04-05 02:12:08 -0400
I can never subscribe to your logic Stu. With all due respect, a systems analyst doesn’t make you a logical thinker in any arena other than computer software. I don’t buy what you are selling. I have read the whole bill, as well as listened to it debated, in senate committees, in the House, on cpac and by the public on several opinion internet radio stations. I have a sense of bill c-51 and how I feel about it. I also have a sense about Stephen Harper, my own opinion of course. But I trust the man. Not blindly, I like to pay attention, but I feel safer with him thanks.
Your need to tweak and twist what is in front of your very eyes, may be the very thing that made you a good systems analyst. But your take is completely weird and strange in my opinion, you are entitled to it as I am to mine.
commented 2015-04-04 18:22:00 -0400
Well, I don’t blame you for smacking me back Stu, I asked for it. Having said that I still think you are way off base.
commented 2015-04-04 16:00:06 -0400
Liza, I’m 67 and don’t live in my mother’s basement. I’m also a retired systems analyst. I read that you do little independent research so you don’t think for yourself but tend to parrot other peoples’ work – much easier approach.
There were 4 casualties that day:; 2 of which were fatal. The “terrorist” and a guardsman were killed by people they didn’t know and a guardsman and the Canadian public at larges were wounded. We saw how quickly the attention shifted from the hill event to the killed guardsman – almost overnight. lost during that time was the fact that the “terrorist” was being visited quite often by two men who were instructing him on Islam. That’s the official story. My take is he was being brainwashed for this event by official agents. My version has as much merit as the official story in that both of them can’t be verified by the public. The reason I say this is because a week before a soldier was killed in Quebec and we were told not to jump to conclusions but in this case the shooter was called a terrorist with an hour by Harper.
For a week al; we heard about was the killed guardsman and his funeral – the old share my grief ploy. – and very little about the “terrorist” other than he was mentally ill. Now Harper wants to put more limits on our freedoms to fight “terrorism”. More people have died by NATO attacking sovereign countries which posed no threat to any NATO country than by all NATO countries combined by “terrorists”. Over 2 million Iraqi men women and children have been killed under the guise of “terrorism”.
commented 2015-04-04 14:28:13 -0400
I happen to question everything, thank you very much. I did wonder at first if it was true, until a certain video aired from The Rebel came out and showed a selfie vid confession, consistent with a Jihadi holy war fighter.
commented 2015-04-04 14:25:02 -0400
David, those videos and many many others just like them have been around since it happened. The contents of which are widely known.. cannot subscribe to your theories. Please stop.
commented 2015-04-04 07:05:04 -0400
Sheeple is the word now used to describe people who follow the leader and close their minds to anything other than what they are told to believe. Question nothing. Everthing happens for a reason. Listen to all sides and then use reason to determine what you believe. Did you view the two videos I suggested .
commented 2015-04-04 02:44:46 -0400
Oh how I truly love hearing these idiocy theories. While I don’t doubt CBC or even CTV would downplay the terrorist attack, I do doubt even they wouldn’t stoop to such crackpot theories. Perhaps that’s why they call them crackpot theories. You’d have to be on crack or pot to come up with such incredible bunk. Stu, if you want to share these whackjob theories, there’s a guy on another comment thread you should really compare notes with. We here in reality would like to discuss the facts presented, not hallucination induced b.s.
commented 2015-04-04 01:40:44 -0400
You clearly do drugs stu, oxy and weed or oxy and booz? No, oxy weed and booz, and you live in your mothers basement. This must be the conspiracy thread. Get out of the basement more often and you wouldn’t have such paranoid thoughts. You keep yourself in fear, but you are afraid of all the wrong things. You will be one of the squealers for sure. Don’t you have a gender studies class to study for. There are lots of other places where you can share this poop. Its just poop.
commented 2015-04-04 01:09:18 -0400
I was watching the news from CTV and CBC the day of the event and I just had to smile because it was all so clear then that this was a false flag event. Mansbridge was talking after the event happened and I paraphrase – he was surprised how quickly the Ottawa SWAT team arrived on the scene (within minutes). Now, it’s reasonable to assume that when an event happens on the Hill the Ottawa SWAT team would be called by the RCMP. They would then have to assemble the team, get things together and travel the distance up Elgin street which is pretty congested during the day. I would say that half an hour from the time the call is made to the time they show up is reasonable.
Next thing is hear from Craig Oliver is that there are 70 cameras on the hill with facial recognition capability. Good point. Now we know that the RCMP knew this guy.
Next I hear the they locked down the city core. That’s when I laughed. How many times have we in Ottawa been told that there is an escaped convict in Ottawa who’s armed and dangerous and the city was never locked down. If I was part of a terrorist group intent on killing Parliamentarians I would stay around the hill to complete my mission and not 10 blocks away. They have to keep us in fear.
Here’s my last point, that day people from the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State were going to announce that Harper’s Minister Denis Label was identified by witnesses as having attended a Ninth Circle child sacrifice next to the Jesuit headquarters in Rome. This ritual was also attended by the new Quebec cardinal Gerald Lacroix. Once news got out that people knew about this sacrifice the Head of the Jesuit Order (aka the Black Pope) Adolfo Nicolas Pachon resigned. See here for more details:http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2a7v1w_kevin-annett-canada-pm-harper-cabinet-minister-denis-lebel-in-ninth-circle-child-sacrifice-in-rome_news
If it smells like a duck, walks like a duck, acts like a duck and looks like a duck it very well may be a duck.
commented 2015-04-03 16:39:27 -0400
Sorry I thought it was Jason who saw the straw in the tree. It was Peter N.
commented 2015-04-03 16:17:30 -0400
Jason straw stuck in a tree , yes of course it happens. In the suggested video Dr.Judy Wood she shows a slide of the straw in a tree. Why not view these two videos ? It will make you wonder just what did happen.
commented 2015-04-03 13:30:31 -0400
David, are you done? You say to keep your mind open, but that can’t be farther from the truth in your case. You sound like one of these tin foil cap wearing “truthers” that are always proven wrong. Why, I’d wager real coin that you still live in mommy’s basement, just based on the rhetoric you keep spewing.
commented 2015-04-03 13:23:59 -0400
Peter you asked where do I get all this stuff well here are a couple of videos you could watch. There are hundreds of them I find these two will answer any questions you may have. They are 2 to 4 hours in length . keep your mind opened and yes it will be hard to believe what happened and what you have been led to believe,
Best 9-11 Documentary + Media Cover-up + No Planes !! and the other one is Dr.Judy Wood : Evidence of breakthrough energy technology on 9/11 Enjoy.
commented 2015-04-03 13:09:42 -0400
No harm done Liza. Many just don’t understand that these are harsh realities, that we are unfortunately dealt with in a world gone completely mad. The fact you were a good enough woman to understand and apologize for a misunderstanding just proves you are someone of great character. I’m pleased to talk to one such as yourself. It gives me hope that there is hope for us after all. :-)
commented 2015-04-03 13:04:03 -0400
I accept that Jason. I get your nuance, sorry.
commented 2015-04-03 12:31:01 -0400
@ Liza
I say “could be” only because I wasn’t there when it happened. Were you on the mission that went to the moon? Did your feet hit the ground hopping out of the lunar lander? For the most part, in a world of manipulated facts and figures, where anything CAN be manipulated into what seems to be the truth, it’s only cautionary to be skeptical about anything not seen firsthand.
commented 2015-04-03 12:05:13 -0400
“could be wrong about the moon landing”? really? Do you get your info from RT as well? Have fun boys.
commented 2015-04-03 11:29:08 -0400
@ David Kitchen
I’ve read the posts you made. You COULD be right about the moon landing, but here’s where your WTC theory gets blown straight out of the water. My cousin was a prime witness the day the planes crashed into the Twin Towers. You can fake video, but you can’t fake being there and seeing it. And before you call him or myself a liar, please present your evidence showing it was faked, or let the whole matter drop. Clearly you have technical knowledge but when it comes to reality, you are showing yourself to be utterly clueless. But that is your right as a “free” citizen.
commented 2015-04-03 07:35:27 -0400
I was going to give up on this but when you read " wings full of naptha " and " a plane travelling at high speed " I just got to say this : Kerosene is the fuel used by these jet planes and check out the highest temperature that it can reach then check out the temperature the steel girders need to melt then subtract one from the other and you will learn something.When planes crash, a lot of them catch fire but none of them turns to dust. As for high speed well jet engins cannot suck in enough air at low speeds to cause the turbines to reach top speed. At the reported alitude that these planes were flying one half speed would be the maxium speed reached.
Why did I get off topic ? On these type of sites it is always nice to know who the contributors are and their level of knowledge and if their gullability level is similar to some of our news anouncers. I heard someone say the other day that they don’t believe Peter Mansbridge got out of the sandbox. I had to agree with him.
commented 2015-04-02 23:03:39 -0400
@ David Kitchen – “… aeroplanes cased in tin foil with plastic nose cones …”

David, airplanes are made of steel wrapped around a steel framework with wings full of naptha which burns very hot.

I have seen wheat straw embedded into a tree after a wind storm.

Yes, a plane travelling at high speed can indeed be embedded into a building. But I am not sure why I bother since your mind is not open as you tell others they must do – “And above all keep an open mind.”.
commented 2015-04-02 22:35:37 -0400
David, a woman I worked with on 9/11 lost all the men in her family that day. They were construction crew reinforcing the foundation of the WTC. She was going to funerals for weeks. And Tom Caldwell was there too. I heard him interviewed after. He saw it. I know Tom. He is a credible person, well respected by all. I think you are wrong on this one.
commented 2015-04-02 21:42:10 -0400
David, before you go. Where do you get that stuff? 💩
commented 2015-04-02 20:15:46 -0400
David, seriously? goodbye to this site? OK, Goodbye! We’ll miss you! Bye! (Wow, I feel just awful about him going)
commented 2015-04-02 19:39:47 -0400
That, is a travesty. Cowards.
He was an Islamic terrorist. He had converted to Islam, he was planning a trip to Syria,he was in contact with other terrorists, his father fought in Libya, he threatened Canada on tape just before his murdering rampage, laying out clearly why the west needed to watch out.

This link includes the transcript of the statement by Paulson, but the page has much more info , keep scrolling.

You can call it what ever you want. I call him a a traitor, a murdering Islamic terrorist, and if he wasn’t already dead should have been sent to death by our courts.
Not true my ass!
commented 2015-04-02 19:38:36 -0400
Hey, David Kitchen, are wearing a tin foil hat, stroking a crystal and sitting under pyramid aligned with Jupiter while you’re typing this stuff? Just curious.