May 11, 2017

Ottawa March for Life rocks it again. Get ready for biased media coverage

Brian LilleyArchive

Once again the national March for Life, the largest, regular political protest on Parliament Hill, drew tens of thousands of people who marched and walked peacefully despite the protesters trying to shut them down.

Watch as I speak with a few attendees on both sides of the issue and give you a glimpse of what it really looked like.

It’s important that you see and hear some of it for yourself because there were politicians in attendance too and that means the media will no doubt be telling biased stories about who was there and what the march was about.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-05-15 13:27:24 -0400
Andrew Stephenson’s language when referring to the unborn is really chilling. His complete lack of regard for human life is callous and uncivilized. The morals of a barbarian. The only difference is that Andrew doesn’t actually draw blood or murder, he just advocates for it.
You can’t ‘humanize’ evil.
commented 2017-05-13 00:23:06 -0400
Sorry Andrew Stephenson, I’m not doing your research for you. You merrily skipped over everything last week and this week to regurgitate. I am suggesting you go back and re-read what has already been posted and look into those questions with an eyes wide open approach.
As for not caring what other countries do, sounds a little pouty to me!
commented 2017-05-12 23:46:25 -0400
“Jan G commented 1 hour ago
Andrew Stephenson:
You said: “I’m not sure why you’d compare Canada to North Korea, unless you’re trying to establish some sort of “guilt by association”. relationship. Although many countries do have laws on the book, they’re often open to interpretation, or not enforced.”

My friend, you are ill-informed and misinformed. You need to educate yourself on this subject. Like really! "

On what? I really don’t care what other countries do, we are leaders not followers.
commented 2017-05-12 23:45:32 -0400
“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 18 mins ago
Andrew Stephenson, I echo what others have been trying to tell you, last week and this week. You are ill-informed and misinformed and to me it looks like it’s intentional. A true effort to research does not include sources like Wiki.
Expand your horizons and give critical thinking a try, you won’t be disappointed. "

Attacking the messenger is so passe.

The actual ruling is enormous, but Wiki’s summary is accurate. If you think it’s wrong, why don’t you show us what, exactly, is wrong? The ruling is easy to find.

My critical thinking tells me that the SCoC ruling is ultimately what matters, and leaves little space for interpretation – any infringement on your personal liberties when it comes to your own body, is unconstitutional.
commented 2017-05-12 23:23:55 -0400
Andrew Stephenson, I echo what others have been trying to tell you, last week and this week. You are ill-informed and misinformed and to me it looks like it’s intentional. A true effort to research does not include sources like Wiki.
Expand your horizons and give critical thinking a try, you won’t be disappointed.
commented 2017-05-12 22:57:57 -0400
Andrew Stephenson:
You said: “I’m not sure why you’d compare Canada to North Korea, unless you’re trying to establish some sort of “guilt by association”. relationship. Although many countries do have laws on the book, they’re often open to interpretation, or not enforced.”

My friend, you are ill-informed and misinformed. You need to educate yourself on this subject. Like really!
commented 2017-05-12 19:57:22 -0400
Andrew Stephenson, please shop your drivel somewhere else. Shoo!
commented 2017-05-12 19:06:01 -0400
Andrew like Allan says, YOU ARE WRONG! And it shows who shares our views on this issue, commie run hellholes.
commented 2017-05-12 19:05:46 -0400
For one thing, it’s not a lie. It’s right in the ruling that it is a violation of the Charter for the state to attempt to legislate over individual autonomy. It’s not about whether politicians are bold enough to address – it’s unconstitutional to try and override the person’s freedom to control their own body… period, full stop.

I really don’t care what other countries do. We are Canada, and having such an aggressive set of personal liberties on security-of-person or self-determination issues (abortion and euthanasia, for example) is something to be proud of. Comparisons to North Korea are disingenuous for that reason.
commented 2017-05-12 18:48:58 -0400
Andrew, why do you keep repeating that lie.? Repeating it does not make it a fact. The SOC did not say all laws restricting abortion are unconstitutional. They said the last one back in the 80’ s was. Since then the politicos both conservative (if only) and the the lefties of all stripes have been too cowardly to attempt another one. At any rate our present situation, whatever the reason, does not put us in good company. We are a loathsome stock of the world.

So please stop your BS on this topic.
commented 2017-05-12 16:58:18 -0400
“Ron Voss commented 6 hours ago
Canada joins China and North Korea as the only countries in the world that have no laws at all to restrict abortion to some extent, and some are stubbornly in favour of such a situation. "

That’s because of the nature of the Supreme Court ruling, which basically states that any such law violates a woman’s security of person (ie, liberty to control one’s own body) and is therefore unconstitutional. The State, legally, cannot make that decision for her; in essence even if laws were on the books, they’d be unenforceable.

I’m not sure why you’d compare Canada to North Korea, unless you’re trying to establish some sort of “guilt by association”. relationship. Although many countries do have laws on the book, they’re often open to interpretation, or not enforced.
commented 2017-05-12 10:51:07 -0400
Canada joins China and North Korea as the only countries in the world that have no laws at all to restrict abortion to some extent, and some are stubbornly in favour of such a situation.
commented 2017-05-12 03:54:53 -0400
I am stubbornly in favor of abortion.
commented 2017-05-12 03:13:50 -0400
All this hullabaloo about the choice of abortion reminds me of a joke during the late ’80’s:
What’s the difference between Chantal Daigle and the Suez Canal?
One’s a busy ditch.
nyuk nyuk nyuk
…. ouuhhhhh the debate that stirred up ….
commented 2017-05-12 00:31:54 -0400
I saw on CP24 tonight the mayor of Ottawa was going to review the policy of flying the pro life flag at city hall.
commented 2017-05-11 23:45:19 -0400
Jan; it’s not reproduction at all. It’s the stifling of reproduction.
commented 2017-05-11 23:44:35 -0400
Jan, I can’t say that I am surprised. They are forever changing their terms and the words that they call themselves and those they call their opponents and just their descriptors. Its all about massaging the terminology to sound clinical inoffensive on their part while reviling their enemies with pejorative names- reinventing themselves and their enemies.
commented 2017-05-11 23:38:32 -0400
If you want it to be your choice , then pay for it yourself. If i have no business in your choice, then why do i have to pay for it?
commented 2017-05-11 23:38:02 -0400
That man interviewed was obviously angry and misanthropic – he was honest in his first Freudian answer: " I don’t know" he has no answers except his anger – he just knew that he had to hate religious people who respect life – that felt right to him. Sad really. His problems are with a dark spirit – who can be opposed to the right to life?
commented 2017-05-11 23:37:00 -0400
The media party will lie about this then when it comes to crap like occupy they lie the opposite way. Something wrong with the truth?
commented 2017-05-11 20:54:42 -0400
GREAT VIDEO BRIAN
I get most of my news from the REBEL
I get the rest of my news from you – fellow REBELS
JAN – very intresting news from you – thanks
commented 2017-05-11 20:52:10 -0400
Good reporting on the pro life demonstration, that the MSM deems very unimportant and totally unnecessary which shows where their communist atheist heads are. That one man (if you want to call it that) Brian interviewed was shocking and thoroughly evil who compared shit and bacteria to a developing human baby. Oh wait, now I get it, he was describing himself as a big pile of shit. Now that makes much more sense.
commented 2017-05-11 20:15:32 -0400
But did you see what Mayor Jim Watson (Ottawa) did? After his ‘wonderful’ message to the March For Life declaring today as March for Life day in Ottawa (read to the crowd and everyone cheered him and City Hall) and raising the March for Life flag at City Hall at 5:45am this morning, he caved and had the flag removed, said he’d have to reconsider any future divisive decisions, all because a couple of feminist councillors and pro-abortionists complained.
CTV Ottawa aired this and, of course, referred to the march as the ‘pro-abortion protest’ for the pro-abortion cause.

People who call themselves pro-choice or say they have no problem with abortion under certain circumstances, simply don’t care if a baby lives or dies – plain and simple. It has nothing to do with choice.

The entire March For Life in Ottawa was aired on EWTN (Eternal Word Television Network = Catholic TV channel) from 11:30am to 5:00pm. It included interviews from all the politicians who attended, particularly PCs (Trost/Lemieux), all the clergy (Cardinals, Archbishops, Priests and Nuns for Life), Campaign Life, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition. Wonderful coverage and probably only the US and the rest of the world saw it because it is only on special coverage in Canada. Canadian cable removed this channel from regular availability because it was religious! It is available throughout the world simply by surfing your channels, except Canada. Silenced. GO figure!!!!
commented 2017-05-11 20:14:16 -0400
Billy Howard,

The problem with your choices is they require the person making the choice to be responsible and accountable. The SJW’s want the right to be irresponsible in their choices with no accountability for the choice they make.
commented 2017-05-11 19:54:06 -0400
Sad but true., Justin Trudeau’s Mother was a Pro Life advocate, if not, perhaps Justin would have been murdered at nine months and a lot of unborn humans would have had the chance to develop into useful people.
commented 2017-05-11 19:12:31 -0400
Pro-choice also means the ability to choose…
Abstention (no sex)
Protection (safe sex)
Variation (non-reproductive sex)
commented 2017-05-11 19:09:27 -0400
Thank you Brian Lilley. You’re right there will be msm bias if the rally is given any attention at all.