May 06, 2015

Pamela Geller: Focusing on me lets the media ignore the Islamic threat

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

I spoke to Pamela Geller shortly after she was named in an ISIS death threat. "They called me 'pig,'" she told me, "using the same word Mohammed used for Jews before he killed them."

Following the foiled terror attack on her "Draw Mohammed" event in Garland, Texas, Geller is in the spotlight more than ever before. 

We talked about the "morally inverted" media attacks on her, but also about the overwhelming support she's receiving from ordinary people.

She praises Garland security and law enforcement for their bravery and efficiency, while noting that the two terrorists had traveled 1000 miles to target her and the other attendees.

That's how dedicated Muslim terrorists are to destroying our way of life and slaughtering anyone who dares to criticize them.

I think you'll be inspired by Geller's refusal to back down while being attacked by two enemies at once: the liberal media and the jihadists.

JOIN for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

Who are Canada's radical Muslim leaders?
FIND OUT and fight back at

READ Shakedown: How Our Government is Undermining Democracy in the Name of Human Rights
Ezra Levant's book about the Canadian Human Rights Commissions, censorship and the Mohammed cartoons --
It was voted "the best political book of the last 25 years."

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-05-09 12:50:17 -0400
Sincerity is great, we all love it.
She and you comment on the unknown motive behind those who hate the Judaic tradition and those who support them.
We counter spiritual darkness with spiritual insight.
The irrational hatred behind anti-judaism, anti americanism, and christianity is demonic.
Whatever God loves, his satanic enemy hates.
We don’t neglect the fact that Christians, Americans and Jews have faults, as do Muslims, but grace covers us all. Only Satan and those deceived by him wishes us all, and especially those who represent the God of love, dead.
commented 2015-05-09 11:26:32 -0400
Her words cut right to the bone, she speaks the truth. You will never be able to capitulate enough for islam. There is no “but” in freedom of speech. What’s next, beauty pageants, fashion shows, beer gardens, art and photography shows? Not until all women are encased in black bedsheets and all men have mandatory beards.
commented 2015-05-09 07:24:20 -0400
OK so Geller is for free speech. I don’t believe it. Geller is a theist who defends the Judeo-Christian ethical tradition. Which means that she opposes Islam IN FAVOUR OF HER FAITH! Effectively telling everyone to shut up while she exorcises her right to free speech. If she were an Atheist or at least a Deist, maybe. But Theists don’t support of free speech.
commented 2015-05-09 05:40:20 -0400
Progressives (aka what some call “liberals”) do not have any commitment to free political speech. So in fairness to them, they cannot understand someone like Geller, who takes risks to speak freely about an imminent threat: We have people living among us as citizens who would murder over a cartoon of a man dead these 1400 years.
Progressives in media have no moral capacity to make a distinction between the Catholic Church not marrying divorced people or gays and jihadis murdering people over cartoons. They happily work with progressive governments to undermine the rights of formerly free citizens. In fairness, many of our citizens choose to listen to progressive media and vote for their candidates. They only squeal when they are themselves the victims. Then they find that no one among them is listening, just as they did not listen when it happened to others. Then they grovel and whine, and side with their persecutors. There is no point in pitying them; pity only those who, not being like-minded, must share a society with them and their media.
commented 2015-05-09 01:08:46 -0400
So, the masochistic treasonous MSM pretends Pamela Geller is a “HATER!”?

I hate crimes and the criminals that commit them – don’t you? Hate is only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing injustices (like islam); without hate, nobody’d ever even bother to accuse any criminals of their crimes, and so hope to end those crimes. In fact, liberals today try to pretend there’s no such things as crime and criminals, because we’re all really only victims anyway! They’d make it “illegal” to accuse any criminals of their crimes, if doing so might hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes! But when they try to make “hate crimes” illegal, they really only ever end up making it illegal to hate crimes!


Liberals are racists: they always assume that ONLY White Western people (including, of course, the Jews in Israel,) are INTELLIGENT enough to be guilty of being truly evil, while all their pet “People Of Colour” (including the “swarthy palestinians”) being mentally inferior and all, just can’t help being enslaved by their instincts and emotions into acting as violent animals when frustrated, the poor oppressed little dears, so the liberals will always indulge their crimes, much as one ignores the new puppy as it pees on the rugs.


When such ‘Authorities’ lie to the public about not understanding the “radical” (fundamental; root) causes of Jihad (i.e: the Qur’an, islam) they are acting as willing criminally negligent accessories enabling those muslim crimes!
commented 2015-05-09 00:35:23 -0400
What language is that, Terry.
commented 2015-05-09 00:00:53 -0400
I hear cowardz sayin we should not antagonyz Muzlim terorists by mokin deir pedofyl foundr #Morhamrd. Dis iz NOT d midl east. Its d free world wher we r free 2 speak our mind. Smart ting 2 do wd b 2 round up al suspectd terorists. Only a coward & a fool wd say: “I wont get in d way uv a terorist in case he takes ofens.”
I hope d heroz who fot & dyd 4 us arnt lookin down wondrin wut hapnd 2 bravery. We shd al try 2 folo Gellerz exampl & stand up 4 wut we ota believ in
commented 2015-05-07 18:20:41 -0400
Islam is a theocratic totalitarian, political ideology masked as a religion. Did you know that they actually have laws regarding which foot should step into a toilet area first and which foot should step out first?
It seems that those that attack Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer have a “soft bigotry of low expectations.” Don’t provoke them, Don’t you know they might become violent???
commented 2015-05-07 14:01:44 -0400
Maurice Potvin “free speech may not be specifically mentioned in the Bible, but it’s certainly implied in the free moral agency of all of humanity”. Good point.
commented 2015-05-07 12:56:50 -0400
I’m always looking forward to the – period! Everyone you add to your Team are FANTASTIC!!! :D

I would like to make a suggestion of someone who would fit right in with your Team: Michael Campbell –
commented 2015-05-07 11:45:52 -0400
Ron, free speech may not be specifically mentioned in the Bible, but it’s certainly implied in the free moral agency of all of humanity. If we are made in God’s image, if we are free to choose between right and wrong, between good and evil, between serving God and rejecting Him, then we must be free, period. God does not want a bunch of robots serving Him, He wants our hearts, freely given. That means we must be free to do so of our own free will, and the one freedom on which every other freedom hangs is freedom of expression. I agree with you about “Hope”, though. I have no doubt whatsoever that things will unfold in God’s perfect timing. It’s just that my own timing isn’t quite as perfect.
commented 2015-05-07 11:30:59 -0400
As a Priest I see no probative value in caricaturing the base tenets of any faith. The only direct conflict should be in terms of verbal debate utilizing the best of logic. Anything else, even under the guise of “free speech” is totally foolish no matter what faith is under its attack.

Having said that, free speech and freewill are Gifts of God, even to those who wish to use the same to denigrate God! Thus, while in poor taste, events such as this, from both a Jewish and a Christian point-of-view, are to be tolerated.

The problem with Islam is that the Koran directs faithful Muslims to silence any descent. A faithful Muslim is, in the words of the Koran, to give the infidel one chance to convert – and if he doesn’t to kill him. While this is clearly the content of Sharia Law based upon Koran, Hadith, and Sunna, such cannot be accepted by democratic society – the kind of society that Islam is out to destroy.
commented 2015-05-07 11:15:27 -0400
MAURICE POTVIN “He doesn’t seem to consult me about any of His plans”. We do have scripture though and that gives us hope. Hope is not wishing something will happen but knowing it will. In the meantime the main problem is the politicians. Most deny there is any threat so they are not much good. I have been reading quite a bit about Pam Geller and her free speech platform. Basically she concludes that there is no free speech in Islam so they are a useless bunch. I am not able to find any verses in the Bible giving people the right of free speech. So Pam and her crew would have to conclude that those who follow scripture are the same as Muslims.
commented 2015-05-07 11:01:18 -0400
Hmmmm… $50k to kill 2 of these barbaric pigs ….sounds like a good deal to me! Way cheaper than all the phoney bureaucracies pretending to protect us. Bait ‘em and kill em. Period. Let’s get this fight out in the open.
commented 2015-05-07 09:07:33 -0400
If the media blames Islamists for the attack instead of Geller, won’t that “provoke” the jihadis to target the media? That is how media reasons and why they blame victims.

Out of irresponsible, self-interested cowardice.
commented 2015-05-07 06:54:59 -0400
Police have run sting operations where they send letters to criminals saying that they have won a prize and all they have to do is proceed to a particular location to collect it. Seems to me we have found a way to entice these crazed jihadists into the open. Have a draw Muhammed contest and fill the room with armed Texans.
commented 2015-05-07 03:26:24 -0400
Ron, I agree. The efforts of man are futile if not in the will of God, but we must try. As Dr. Phil says, “Pray to God, but row for shore”. However, I don’t believe a lasting solution will be found without Divine intervention. I know it’s coming, but when? God doesn’t keep me in the loop these days; in fact, He doesn’t seem to consult me about any of His plans. This “trust” thing seems so hard for impatient people like me sometimes.
commented 2015-05-07 00:58:03 -0400
Thank God Pamela Gellar is able to afford 50,000 for security. Because of this event two terrorists, Islamist terrorists were taken out. There are more where they came from, but to pretend that these free speech events are making the trouble happen is psychotic. That popular politically correct rhetoric is fast evaporating. This is self defence.

Paul Crosby, “Islam is a trojan horse”.
commented 2015-05-07 00:19:58 -0400
Go Pamela Geller! You have a lot of fans here…you are a gift to the U.S.A. and Canada…People know the truth when they hear it and you speak the truth…
commented 2015-05-07 00:10:40 -0400
Maurice Potvin very true what you have pointed out. No 10 is what it is all about. I was out of the country for 25 years and when I returned I said to people what is going on here the country will be a Muslim state by 2040. I was told I was a racist, a bigot, intolerant and much worse. It will not be easy to reverse what is going on. I don’t think any of the political parties have a clue what is happening. As I said on another post only Christianity can stop the inevitable.
commented 2015-05-07 00:05:55 -0400
Islam is a Trojan horse to tell us how to live. It’s a political movement disguised as a religion. Islamist views are antithetical to the West. At critical mass, it will be the violent extremist, intolerant radicals, that will form the wedge to destroy your society. The rest will live in fear.

The media is controlled by carpetbagging corporatists/globalists. Investigative and independent journalism, in the mainstream, is rare or non-existent and shows a pathological willful blindness.

Pamela Geller and company smoked out a couple Muslim rats out of their nests. The war is on, the fight is here and it’s freedom versus slavery. It’s time for our ‘leaders’ to act accordingly and the people to demand it.
commented 2015-05-06 23:42:22 -0400
Ron Zager, if we were to “slow down immigration from muslim countries” that would only plug one hole. I think problems are multi-layered. I’ll try to articulate them as best I can, but I’m sure I’ll forget some, but here goes….

1) Immigration policy, as you point out.
2) 2nd and 3rd generation Muslim youth: Often Muslims whose parents came to Canada fleeing genuine oppression and persecution, become apathetic and begin a search for meaning to their lives. As G.K. Chesterton said, “Meaninglessness does not come from being weary of pain. Meaninglessness comes from being weary of pleasure.” Too often they find that meaning in radical Islam.
3) Radical Imams in the mosques, teaching radical jihad to impressionable youth: What they’re saying in the mosques needs to be monitored and documented.
4) Internet radicalization.
5) The comparative birth rate of Muslims to the rest of the population: In one or two more generations, they will have the numbers to impose their ideology through the ballot box.
6) Law enforcement that turns a blind eye to hate speech from Muslims, but pounces on anyone who say anything considered to be “Islamaphobic”.
7) Ditto for the Judicial system.
8) MSM: need I say more?
9) Liberals and NDP who would sell their soul to the Devil to get votes. In the case of Islam, that’s exactly what they’re doing.
10) The apathy of the general public who don’t recognize the threat, not to just their way of life, but to their very lives!

Those are the threats to our freedom as I see them. I’m sure I missed some. They must be challenged and confronted head on, on a broad front. Abraham Lincoln said we must not be deterred from our pursuit of liberty by “fear of dungeons to ourselves”. I fear that to fight the good fight for our freedom, some of us might very well have to submit to “dungeons to ourselves”. I hope it isn’t me, but the fight is worth it.
commented 2015-05-06 22:49:15 -0400
“I watched yesterday on Fox news The O’Reily factor” O’Reilly wants the jihadists wiped out. He is clear on that.
commented 2015-05-06 22:28:46 -0400
I watched yesterday on Fox news The O’Reily factor . OReily denounced Pamela Geller called her stupid He could be on MSNBC replacing Chriss Mathtwes He said that there are 1.5 billlion Muslim and they should not be insulted and Jordan is and Egypt are fighting ISIS they should not be insulted. Indicating that they fight ISIS for us not for themselves Essentially O’Reily demonstrated political correctness as a perfect Dhimmy ready to prostrate himself and pay Jizwa. or maybe even convert to Islam
commented 2015-05-06 21:33:38 -0400
Michael you are right in saying “slow down immigration from muslim countries is all that is needed”. But who is going to enforce that? According to some charts presented by Ezra muslim immigration has exploded under the current so-called conservative government.
commented 2015-05-06 21:19:58 -0400
Nowhere in the Quran does it say to kill those who draw mohammad cartoons. Not all muslims believe in Sharia Law. Given many do. Slow down immigration from muslim countries is all that is needed. Those who are here will integrate if their numbers stay small enough for long enough. We will see if my opinion changes. It gets more harsh with every foiled plot and terrorist attack on western soil.
commented 2015-05-06 21:17:17 -0400
It would appear the constitutionally protected event proved the nationally held belief that jihadists are now within the countries borders. Exposing the lunacy of Sharia law and its educational tenets calling for killing those who do not follow the Islamic rules appears to be the responsibility of all Americans with a backbone.
commented 2015-05-06 21:10:26 -0400
Thanks for your comment Maurice Potvin . I always read what you have to say.
commented 2015-05-06 20:59:44 -0400
CATHY ROCHFORD your suggested answer about what to do that follows after the “but”, namely, “a good starting point would be to stop immigration from the middle east and all mosques need to be scrutinized and shut down if need be”, makes a lot of sense. However, what political party in Canada would be willing to step up with such an approach, particularly as a lot of Canadians have been brainwashed into thinking that Islam is a religion of peace.
According to Canada’s 2011 National Household Survey, there were 1,053,945 Muslims in Canada or about 3.2% of the population (7.7% of the population in the Greater Toronto Area) making them the second largest religion after Christianity and the fastest growing religion in Canada. Is it possible to be a non-violent Muslim? The answer clearly must be yes otherwise we would be overwhelmed by terrorism by Muslims living in Canada. However, how do you know who and how many are inclined to act in that way, if not now, then at some later date? Are you able to read their minds? It has been estimated that at least 10-15% of Muslims all over the world sympathize with jihadist terrorism. So let’s do the math. It is conceivable that at least 105,394 to 158,092 of Muslim population in Canada “confront us with an enormous terrorist army”. Also, keep in mind, that while jihad can be advanced by violence and terrorist activities it can also be advanced financially, that is, so-called covert or clandestine terrorists. Ultimately, it must be understood that here is no such thing as a “moderate” Muslim, because there is no such thing as a moderate Islam! If a Muslim adheres to the direction provided in the Qu’aran and mimics the life of Muhammad, then an objective of worldwide supremacism by Islam is built into their religion. One would assume that such a message is taught in the mosques or otherwise they would be apostate. That’s the complex situation that we are faced with, which unfortunately nobody in the political circles even wants to consider or talk about. A suggestion that I have made before is that no further immigration from Muslim countries be allowed until countries like Saudi Arabia, for example, allow the building of churches and free expression.
commented 2015-05-06 20:40:01 -0400
I have a new hero aswell.
<-- /_page_stream.html -->