So Justin Trudeau says he’s going to import 25,000 Syrian migrants by Christmas. Which is seven weeks away.
Put aside questions like: How will our social services handle them? How many Canadian homeless will be displaced by Syrian homeless? How many hospital beds will be reserved for them?
Here’s what I’m worried about instead:
How do you do background checks on 25,000 people, coming from a terrorist wasteland, in seven weeks?
Type their names into Google? Ask for a resume?
I'll show you a video of Syrian “moderates”, fighting against the terrorist-supporting Syrian government. They’ve put women from the Alawite ethnic minority in a cage on a pickup truck as human shields, because that’s the ethnic clan that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad is from.
Remember: These are the "moderates."
Syria is one of the most backward countries in the world. For liberals, if gay rights is your thing, you’re pretty much importing 25,000 homophobes.
Syria is also the country that was clocking 200 honour killings a year before the civil war — which has surely skyrocketed as Muslim men kill any sisters or wives who have been raped in the course of war.
What about Syrians and other refugees who've never been violent, but who, in their regular lives, hate the West, hate women, hate minorities, hate gays, hate Jews, hate liberal democracy?
Well, there's actually a recent scientific poll of Syrian refugees, carried out by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar. (SCROLL DOWN to see the whole survey.)
Let me show you the bundle of joy we’re about to import by Christmas:
31% of Syrian refugees disagree with the objective of defeating the Islamic State terrorist group.
So out of 25,000 refugees, 7,500 will be ISIS lovers.
41% are Jew-hating, America-hating bigots.
97% are gay-hating, probably women-hating bigots.
Again: How do you screen them out?
If you’re Justin Trudeau, you don’t — because you don’t care, as long as they vote for you in 2019.
The media won’t tell you all the facts about the migrant crisis.
FIND OUT TheTruthAboutRefugees.com ONLY from TheRebel.media.
READ The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies, and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr, Ezra Levant’s new book about domestic terrorism and radicalization.
JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.
So out of 25,000 refugees, 7,500 will be ISIS lovers.”
Note: they never asked why they disagreed with the objective. And some people think this guy is a genius …
That said, this poll it is really no accurate predictor of ISIS activism – for that you can go on the fact that the last 4 terror attacks in Europe were 4 ISIS operatives who came in with migrants with forged Syrian ID. At the very lowest number we can peg them at is 1% of the Syrian diaspora – which means there is a mathematical probability of importing 250 ISIS terror operatives in 25000 screened immigrants.
Whoever proceeds with importing this diaspora here without deep screening for compatability, will be an accessory in any damage they do to Canadians and should be held maaterially responsible.
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/brigitte-gabriel-forever-destroys-peaceful-muslim-majority-argument-gets-standing-ovation-video/
- If the vast majority of Muslims “abhor” the terrorists actions, where do the terrorists get the money they need for the bombs, bullets, guns, not to mention the money the terrorists need to live (food, housing,…) ?
For each terrorist, you need thousands of supporters to give them financial, logistical and moral support. We KNOW that many of the West’s Islamic “charities” send money into the Middle East, that ends up in the hands of terrorists (CAIR).
- There have been no demonstrations by “peaceful Muslims” against these terrorist attacks. The only thing we see is immediately after a brutal attack by MUSLIM terrorists are a few Muslim spokespeople go on television to “object” to these terrorist attacks. Then they say, that they are worried about “Islamophobia”. No follow-through by these Muslim leaders ever occurs to reduce radicalization in their Mosques. The radical Imams continue their recruitment for radicals. Any “objection to terrorist attacks” appear to be only public relations.
- We know that opinion polls of Muslims indicate that the majority of Muslims favour Sharia law (Ben Shapiro did a video on this “the myth of the tiny radical Muslim minority”). We saw after 911, video of the Palestinians cheering. We also saw the Palestinians cheer the death of an Israeli soldier who accidently wandered into their territory. The soldier was MURDERERED, then his body was dragged through the streets while Palestinians cheered. We also saw the Indonesian women protest Americans going into Afghanistan to destroy Al Qaeda, after Al Qaeda attacked America on 911.
It is a media LIE that the vast majority of Muslims are “peaceful”. You CANNOT support terrorists, and be considered peaceful. The media knows it. They don’t want us to defend ourselves. The media WILL attack us with “Islamophobe” if we try to defend ourselves.
What happens to society’s as the Muslim population grows in percentage of the total?
In the book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat, written by Dr. Peter Hammond, he explores the topic of the impact that an increasing Muslim population has on that society. The lists below illustrate the Muslim population status of countries around the world, and exactly what changes to the societies can be expected according to Hammond.
The book as well as the author are controversial, but the topic is definitely something that needs to be explored and understood. From the book:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for
Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and ***ya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2iBZkODgxA#t=858
“Do you think it is possible to bring in 25,000 refugees and do a proper screening on all of them by the end of the year?”
I have done this work in the past.
The answer is no.
In fact under the circumstance of no valid follow up or verification of statements made and missing records, there is no way in heaven or hell they could be “cleared” if it took ten years.
But trudope does not care.
It will be done.
Proving the security of the country is not a priority.
Canadian voters as a whole – and I admit not all of them – will simply get what they deserve – a fool for a leader.
You voted and you won libs and lefties – now we will all pay for it.
Sigh! It is so hard to find a left winger who wants to debate the real issues.
I do not know the answer to your questions but again, why do you think the people charged with this undertaking will take unnecessary risks? These are likely the same people who have directed immigration, refugees and the military for the past 4 years – perhaps the past 10.
I think all of this is a tempest in a teapot – I seriously doubt the Liberals will make perfectly good on their promise given the short amount of time available. – The fact that they seem to be trying in good faith (and the fact that it’s 4 years prior to the next election) I doubt anyone is seriously worried about it. That said I have to believe that EVERYONE is sensitive to the security concerns because EVERYONE understands that if this effort leads to a serious terrorist incident – EVERYONE will remember it come next election.
It seems you and I violently agree that there are risks and they should be taken seriously. Not to give up too soon on an argument though, I wonder why you would be concerned that a military base is not a good place to house people if you’re concerned about security. Your statement suggests that we will have 1000’s of people housed in these places that are ready and able to pick up arms against their host country – it’s a statement that verges on paranoia.
Meaningless to the point. I will not address your perception of Ezra’s honesty. It is irrelevant to the topic. That is called obfuscation.
Okay, so they will bring them over and then do the processing. That is you contention that the Justin Liberal promised. Okay, let’s run with that. Your last paragraph, I agree we need to do something, just what and in what order is up for dispute.
So, where do we house them, on military bases where the weapons are and where our forces will be out numbered?
And what do we do with those that fail the screening, send them back to the war zone? Jail them even though they have not yet committed a crime in our country? Let them walk the streets free?
That is just a couple of concerns i have.
It’s a reasonable question – whether we can process 25000 refugees in so short a time. I certainly don’t know. I did not think the promise was to do so – I understood the government would try to bring 25,000 refugees to Canada before January, house them and then process them.
I believe there is pressure for Canada do it’s part, to lessen the suffering in the middle-east any way we can. I do think mistakes will be made (and would be no matter what colour tie the PM is wearing). I think there are risks. I expect that the people who know how to do this are very aware of this and the scrutiny they are under and I hope we will not see any serious consequences for doing what has to be done.