November 14, 2015

Poll: 31% of Syrian refugees support ISIS -- and Trudeau is importing 25,000 by Christmas

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

So Justin Trudeau says he’s going to import 25,000 Syrian migrants by Christmas. Which is seven weeks away.

Put aside questions like: How will our social services handle them? How many Canadian homeless will be displaced by Syrian homeless? How many hospital beds will be reserved for them?

Here’s what I’m worried about instead:

How do you do background checks on 25,000 people, coming from a terrorist wasteland, in seven weeks?

Type their names into Google? Ask for a resume?

I'll show you a video of Syrian “moderates”, fighting against the terrorist-supporting Syrian government. They’ve put women from the Alawite ethnic minority in a cage on a pickup truck as human shields, because that’s the ethnic clan that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad is from.

Remember: These are the "moderates."

Syria is one of the most backward countries in the world. For liberals, if gay rights is your thing, you’re pretty much importing 25,000 homophobes.

Syria is also the country that was clocking 200 honour killings a year before the civil war — which has surely skyrocketed as Muslim men kill any sisters or wives who have been raped in the course of war.

What about Syrians and other refugees who've never been violent, but who, in their regular lives, hate the West, hate women, hate minorities, hate gays, hate Jews, hate liberal democracy?

Well, there's actually a recent scientific poll of Syrian refugees, carried out by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar. (SCROLL DOWN to see the whole survey.)

Let me show you the bundle of joy we’re about to import by Christmas:

31% of Syrian refugees disagree with the objective of defeating the Islamic State terrorist group.

So out of 25,000 refugees, 7,500 will be ISIS lovers.

41% are Jew-hating, America-hating bigots.

97% are gay-hating, probably women-hating bigots.

Again: How do you screen them out?

If you’re Justin Trudeau, you don’t — because you don’t care, as long as they vote for you in 2019.




The media won’t tell you all the facts about the migrant crisis.

READ The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies, and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr, Ezra Levant’s new book about domestic terrorism and radicalization.

JOIN FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-12-13 06:09:23 -0500
“31% of Syrian refugees disagree with the objective of defeating the Islamic State terrorist group.
So out of 25,000 refugees, 7,500 will be ISIS lovers.”
Note: they never asked why they disagreed with the objective. And some people think this guy is a genius …
commented 2015-11-17 12:54:10 -0500
I think that trying to pull the conclusion Ezra did from the data sets is a leap of logic. The questions asked could be transposed to any western so called Christian nation and receive similar results – if anything, this poll shows a split between reflective and reflexive attitudes held by the respondents -which is enlighting to see that there are a good deal of pragmatic responses which obviously do not hold the same despotic dogmas of the radicals.

That said, this poll it is really no accurate predictor of ISIS activism – for that you can go on the fact that the last 4 terror attacks in Europe were 4 ISIS operatives who came in with migrants with forged Syrian ID. At the very lowest number we can peg them at is 1% of the Syrian diaspora – which means there is a mathematical probability of importing 250 ISIS terror operatives in 25000 screened immigrants.

Whoever proceeds with importing this diaspora here without deep screening for compatability, will be an accessory in any damage they do to Canadians and should be held maaterially responsible.
commented 2015-11-16 15:30:10 -0500
Yes, Lena it is like “thou dost protest too much” with the media (and other misinformed citizens). Why do they feel the need to constantly tell us that? Is it because they suspect it’s a lie?
commented 2015-11-16 04:47:45 -0500
It would be nice if you could have linked to the study to make it easier to make up our own minds what this means.
commented 2015-11-15 14:03:25 -0500
Lena. Great video. Thanks!
commented 2015-11-15 14:00:45 -0500
GEORGE’S MOM Def a slammer go praty to the east if you love islam so much
commented 2015-11-15 12:08:26 -0500
The Canadian media (CTV, GLOBAL TV, CBC, MACLEANS, CANADIAN PRESS TORONTO STAR,…) keeps repeating the refrain “the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful, and abhor the violence the terrorists are committing”.

- If the vast majority of Muslims “abhor” the terrorists actions, where do the terrorists get the money they need for the bombs, bullets, guns, not to mention the money the terrorists need to live (food, housing,…) ?

For each terrorist, you need thousands of supporters to give them financial, logistical and moral support. We KNOW that many of the West’s Islamic “charities” send money into the Middle East, that ends up in the hands of terrorists (CAIR).

- There have been no demonstrations by “peaceful Muslims” against these terrorist attacks. The only thing we see is immediately after a brutal attack by MUSLIM terrorists are a few Muslim spokespeople go on television to “object” to these terrorist attacks. Then they say, that they are worried about “Islamophobia”. No follow-through by these Muslim leaders ever occurs to reduce radicalization in their Mosques. The radical Imams continue their recruitment for radicals. Any “objection to terrorist attacks” appear to be only public relations.

- We know that opinion polls of Muslims indicate that the majority of Muslims favour Sharia law (Ben Shapiro did a video on this “the myth of the tiny radical Muslim minority”). We saw after 911, video of the Palestinians cheering. We also saw the Palestinians cheer the death of an Israeli soldier who accidently wandered into their territory. The soldier was MURDERERED, then his body was dragged through the streets while Palestinians cheered. We also saw the Indonesian women protest Americans going into Afghanistan to destroy Al Qaeda, after Al Qaeda attacked America on 911.

It is a media LIE that the vast majority of Muslims are “peaceful”. You CANNOT support terrorists, and be considered peaceful. The media knows it. They don’t want us to defend ourselves. The media WILL attack us with “Islamophobe” if we try to defend ourselves.
commented 2015-11-15 12:04:23 -0500
I’ve always known Canada and it’s First World Allies as multicultural societies. Unfortunately, there are some religious extremists with no career and no future who live in the basements of their mothers’ homes who have nothing better to do with their lives but encourage hatred , regardless of what religion they are. However, it’s no secret that some of these religious beliefs are coming to us in massive swarms and terrorism today is rampid amongst us due to the mass volumes of immigration. All it takes is one bad apple to migrate into our first world free society and encourage hatred within our borders. So haw many of these " one bad apples" are going to be in a population of 25000 good apples if we just let them in because they have had a tough life. I can’t even get on a freakin plane with a bottle of water but our freedom loving government is going to allow 25000 Syrians into Canada by Christmas. How about taking care of the people of Canada first and solving our own starvation problems at home. Is it any big surprise when you hear the names of these imposters who blow people up and shoot mass amounts of citizens in a free democratic society. Canadian . British, French , German, Dutch citizens?? Is that really what these names imply? Doesn’t matter where they’ve claimed citizenship; they weren’t born and bred in these free societies. If you are proven to be a terrorist, your name should be only associated then with the extremist society you came from….just so there is no doubt.
commented 2015-11-15 03:25:53 -0500
Georges Mom sorry to bring facts to your lies, and did you miss the fact stated below that at least a few of them were Syrian refugees? Of course you did , you are either one of them or you think you will not be in the line of fire.
commented 2015-11-15 03:24:15 -0500
Georges Mom we have experienced more than 2 acts in Canada, the others were stopped , did you forget about those?
commented 2015-11-14 22:22:52 -0500
I know I posted this info before , but I am reposting it hoping it will be shared and reposted by others.
What happens to society’s as the Muslim population grows in percentage of the total?

In the book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat, written by Dr. Peter Hammond, he explores the topic of the impact that an increasing Muslim population has on that society. The lists below illustrate the Muslim population status of countries around the world, and exactly what changes to the societies can be expected according to Hammond.

The book as well as the author are controversial, but the topic is definitely something that needs to be explored and understood. From the book:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States — Muslim 0.6%

Australia — Muslim 1.5%

Canada — Muslim 1.9%

China — Muslim 1.8%

Italy — Muslim 1.5%

Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

This is happening in:

Denmark — Muslim 2%

Germany — Muslim 3.7%

United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%

Spain — Muslim 4%

Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for

Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France — Muslim 8%

Philippines — 5%

Sweden — Muslim 5%

Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%

The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%

Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

Guyana — Muslim 10%

India — Muslim 13.4%

Israel — Muslim 16%

Kenya — Muslim 10%

Russia — Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%

Chad — Muslim 53.1%

Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and ***ya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania — Muslim 70%

Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%

Qatar — Muslim 77.5%

Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%

Egypt — Muslim 90%

Gaza — Muslim 98.7%

Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%

Iran — Muslim 98%

Iraq — Muslim 97%

Jordan — Muslim 92%

Morocco — Muslim 98.7%

Pakistan — Muslim 97%

Palestine — Muslim 99%

Syria — Muslim 90%

Tajikistan — Muslim 90%

Turkey — Muslim 99.8%

United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%

Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%

Somalia — Muslim 100%

Yemen — Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
commented 2015-11-14 21:33:56 -0500
It is 6:30 p.m. on the West Coast… Within the last hour an English reporter talking to FOX News has stated that the French police have found that two of the terrorists were “Syrian refugee claimants who entered Europe through Greece…” So much for “screening”, and in Canada’s case, “good luck” screening 25,000 of them between now and Christmas… So let’s all grow up and get real: – we will inevitably be admitting some ISIS terrorists if Turdoe sticks to his insane plan….
commented 2015-11-14 20:22:52 -0500
Before any refugee is allowed on-board a Canadian bound flight, they should be shown a picture of a cluster of igloos and told that this will be your future village.
commented 2015-11-14 19:54:26 -0500
So much for stringent gun control laws like France has!
commented 2015-11-14 19:50:02 -0500
Seven weeks to properly vette 25,000 people? That is madness!! We are in for a world of hurt.
commented 2015-11-14 19:16:50 -0500
Georges Mom is a slammer through and through – pretending to not be one
commented 2015-11-14 19:15:06 -0500
@ George’s Mom. I don’t think anyone is paranoid, jJust awake. Lots of good books out there on political Islam. Fascinating and frightening this is.
commented 2015-11-14 19:03:27 -0500
This has been posted a few times on this thread:

“Do you think it is possible to bring in 25,000 refugees and do a proper screening on all of them by the end of the year?”

I have done this work in the past.

The answer is no.

In fact under the circumstance of no valid follow up or verification of statements made and missing records, there is no way in heaven or hell they could be “cleared” if it took ten years.

But trudope does not care.

It will be done.

Proving the security of the country is not a priority.

Canadian voters as a whole – and I admit not all of them – will simply get what they deserve – a fool for a leader.

You voted and you won libs and lefties – now we will all pay for it.
commented 2015-11-14 19:00:23 -0500
Georges Mom no evidence there is risk? ARE YOU FOR REAL? A refugee was in the attack on Paris. You are pretty lost.
commented 2015-11-14 18:37:48 -0500
Okay. You posted that just before I posted my last comment and did not see it.
commented 2015-11-14 18:36:50 -0500
@ George’s Mom – Why am I not surprised that you do not want to address the real issue Ezra was addressing about the 25,000 Syria refugees and properly screening them by the end of the year, but all you want to talk about how you believe Ezra lied about the stats.

Sigh! It is so hard to find a left winger who wants to debate the real issues.
commented 2015-11-14 18:33:32 -0500
PETER – the point of Ezra’s article may be as you say to question whether it’s sensible to bring in 25,000 refugees, however his justification was not resources or accommodation but security and to bolster the argument he makes bold faced lies – the headline itself a lie. Hardly obfuscating to point that out.

I do not know the answer to your questions but again, why do you think the people charged with this undertaking will take unnecessary risks? These are likely the same people who have directed immigration, refugees and the military for the past 4 years – perhaps the past 10.

I think all of this is a tempest in a teapot – I seriously doubt the Liberals will make perfectly good on their promise given the short amount of time available. – The fact that they seem to be trying in good faith (and the fact that it’s 4 years prior to the next election) I doubt anyone is seriously worried about it. That said I have to believe that EVERYONE is sensitive to the security concerns because EVERYONE understands that if this effort leads to a serious terrorist incident – EVERYONE will remember it come next election.

It seems you and I violently agree that there are risks and they should be taken seriously. Not to give up too soon on an argument though, I wonder why you would be concerned that a military base is not a good place to house people if you’re concerned about security. Your statement suggests that we will have 1000’s of people housed in these places that are ready and able to pick up arms against their host country – it’s a statement that verges on paranoia.
commented 2015-11-14 18:16:20 -0500
Since one of the attackers in Paris was a refugee from early October, maybe we should rethink this promise?
commented 2015-11-14 17:30:56 -0500
PETER I think the distortions and lies in this article are clear – all you have to do is compare it’s claims to what’s actually in the attached report. I won’t argue the point further. "

Meaningless to the point. I will not address your perception of Ezra’s honesty. It is irrelevant to the topic. That is called obfuscation.

Okay, so they will bring them over and then do the processing. That is you contention that the Justin Liberal promised. Okay, let’s run with that. Your last paragraph, I agree we need to do something, just what and in what order is up for dispute.

So, where do we house them, on military bases where the weapons are and where our forces will be out numbered?

And what do we do with those that fail the screening, send them back to the war zone? Jail them even though they have not yet committed a crime in our country? Let them walk the streets free?

That is just a couple of concerns i have.
commented 2015-11-14 17:25:46 -0500
Maybe I was not clear – I think Liberal’s promise during the election was unfortunate and likely unnecessary. I trying to make perfectly good on that promise by taking unnecessary risks would be terribly irresponsible. There is no evidence anyone is doing so.
commented 2015-11-14 17:22:13 -0500
PETER I think the distortions and lies in this article are clear – all you have to do is compare it’s claims to what’s actually in the attached report. I won’t argue the point further.

It’s a reasonable question – whether we can process 25000 refugees in so short a time. I certainly don’t know. I did not think the promise was to do so – I understood the government would try to bring 25,000 refugees to Canada before January, house them and then process them.

I believe there is pressure for Canada do it’s part, to lessen the suffering in the middle-east any way we can. I do think mistakes will be made (and would be no matter what colour tie the PM is wearing). I think there are risks. I expect that the people who know how to do this are very aware of this and the scrutiny they are under and I hope we will not see any serious consequences for doing what has to be done.
commented 2015-11-14 17:16:57 -0500
George, Do you think it is possible to bring in 25,000 refugees and do a proper screening on all of them by the end of the year?
commented 2015-11-14 17:14:30 -0500
I am waiting, George.