May 05, 2015

Question of the Day: Should "family washroom" signs be replaced by "all gender" ones?

Emily PrattRebel Correspondent

Edmonton is changing family washroom signs inside city-owned buildings to read “all gender," in an effort to be more inclusive of the LGBTQ community.

We hit the streets to see if you think family washroom signs across Canada should be renamed “all gender."

Tell us what YOU think in the comments!

JOIN for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

VISIT our NEW group blog The Megaphone!
It’s your one-stop shop for rebellious commentary from independent and fearless readers and writers.

Ontario’s sex-ed curriculum sexualizes young children, undermines parental authority and imposes the government's morality on every Ontario family.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-05-08 00:37:23 -0400
So how did fathers out with baby daughters and mothers out with baby sons deal with this before these special bathrooms. We managed to figure it out. This isn’t about that, its about normalizing and bending society to give special preference to minority trans genders. A family washroom is one thing, but putting that in the place of “all genders” is insane. All genders don’t fit in a family washroom. And it just gets ridiculous.
commented 2015-05-06 12:16:47 -0400
For all those who have given me negative feedback for stating the obvious – liberalism is a mental disorder – I want you to read this article, step back two paces (figuratively) and think about it objectively…… What you are seeing is madness!
When you step forward those to paces into your subjective lefty/liberal world again, remember what you saw…madness!
commented 2015-05-06 09:06:16 -0400
Darren is right. If a queer father needs to change the diaper of his baby girl in public, or if a dyke mother needs to change her toddler boy, they are both welcome to use the Family washroom with the change table.

Men with no babies use the Men’s, women with no babies use the Women’s. Why would anyone want innocent babies to stay dirty just because of their parents’ gender? None of us would.

But seriously, any city thst would spend money to change “Family” to “Aa Genders” has way too much money. The term “Family” already includes all genders as all genders have family.
commented 2015-05-06 08:56:23 -0400
Don’t all genders have family?

The NDP obviously has work to do as Alberta cities clearly have too much money.
commented 2015-05-05 22:27:08 -0400
“Madness rules. I hate to think what is coming next.” Agreed Ron.
commented 2015-05-05 21:02:02 -0400
There’s only one explanation for all of this happening. THE WORLD HAS GONE COMPLETELY BONKKERS!!!!! I guess that just leaves us at to pick up the pieces after the rest of the world self-destructs.
commented 2015-05-05 19:53:23 -0400
No! This is a Liberal Taotalitarian way of acclimating the taking away of Privacy away from people and individuals, it is like cattle training that the Global Elite use!
commented 2015-05-05 19:43:40 -0400
mean, not need
commented 2015-05-05 19:41:50 -0400
Just because Obama needed one in the White House for his ‘wife’ doesn’t need we do too.
commented 2015-05-05 19:14:44 -0400
FFS. Family washrooms are meant for parents/guardians with members who aren’t able to complete the job themselves i.e. toddlers, special needs, elderly.
Whatever biological parts you have, that’s the can you use. End of story.
commented 2015-05-05 18:35:27 -0400
The answer is NO.
There are a heck of a lot more families that need that washroom than confused trans-whatever people.
commented 2015-05-05 18:28:49 -0400
Madness rules. I hate to think what is coming next.
commented 2015-05-05 18:10:10 -0400
Where are parents supposed to go to change their babies diapers when people who don’t like to use public washrooms opt for the single use facilities? Maybe we need to replace all public washrooms with banks of single use lavatories as I expect certain cultures will abuse the limited availability single use facilities.
commented 2015-05-05 17:27:58 -0400
All genders is all inclusive and therefore redundant. “Washroom” will suffice.
commented 2015-05-05 17:07:39 -0400
oh oh who is going to take the crap on the complaints about peeing on the seat…i always wonder what women washrooms were like..wait sorry, now how do i respond about the other 5 genders…
commented 2015-05-05 16:57:38 -0400
Seems your only getting the opinion of the cidiot’s, need to try asking the question of the day outside of Toronto, where people actually have their own opinions, and not just what they think their supposed to think, or say
commented 2015-05-05 16:55:01 -0400
If this happens, one thing is certain. You’ll never see another woman take a crap in a public washroom. Women have enough trouble crapping with other women in the same washroom.

And it is more likely that you will never see another woman use a public washroom again without being accompanied by someone else.

Women are moody enough as it is already. Why add gas to the fire (no pun intended).

So maybe an “national constipation epidemic” is in order, right?
commented 2015-05-05 15:53:24 -0400
No it’s not a good idea. Why should small children and babies be exposed to this. The executive washrooms should be all gender inclusive if they are so concerned with making the transgendered species feel comfortable.
commented 2015-05-05 15:51:57 -0400
Like I said before if you reach down and it fit’s in your hand your a man if you reach down and theres nothing to hold on to your a woman LIVE WITH IT.