September 29, 2016

Ray Heard talks Presidential debates (and Hillary conspiracy theories)

Brian LilleyArchive

It’s been a couple of days since the first Presidential debate and the polls are all over the place but how are the candidates looking now as they get back on the campaign trail?

Watch as I discuss the debate and how the candidates are doing post-debate with long-time journalist and political observer, Ray Heard.

Not surprisingly, Heard has a lot to say about the lack of objectivity of debate moderator Lester Holt and Trump’s apparent hesitancy to go after crooked Hillary.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-09-30 13:35:30 -0400
We need a miracle. God may want America to stew in its own vomit as He has in the past. But I still pray that the Lord Jesus spare us from evil incarnate.
commented 2016-09-30 12:58:51 -0400
Bill, I don’t see how affiliation matters. If the poll was done in Canada, registration would be irrelevant, because we don’t do that. In fact it is bad news if registered Democrats outnumber Republicans 700 to 500.

Anonymous, the problem is the media colluded to cheat with Hillary. So the next 2 debates will be the same.
commented 2016-09-30 12:53:40 -0400
Christian I still get 36 yo 34 in favour of Clinton.
commented 2016-09-30 10:43:52 -0400
Hillary has honed her ability to lie under stress in front of house investigations, and FBI criminal interrogations and on the defendant’s stand in many criminal trials – she’s a seasoned pathological liar. Trump has no experience lying like Hillary does.

What I get a laugh from are the mindless cucks who support this criminal – you have to have a predisposition toward personal dishonesty to do that.
commented 2016-09-30 09:22:56 -0400
“Drew Wakariuk commented 6 hours ago
Andrew how does Hillary know how much tax Trump paid? "

Initially, because he had to submit his returns as part of a casino application.

More recently, because of a neat little exchange during the debate, when Clinton said he may not pay any federal taxes at all (he didn’t in previous returns), and he replied " that makes me smart", confirming straight from the horses mouth that he indeed pays no federal tax.
commented 2016-09-30 09:04:42 -0400
How many self respecting African American men are going to be induced into voting for what Fred Sanford used to call “an ugly old white woman” .
commented 2016-09-30 04:03:01 -0400
Hillary asked Trump: Where are your tax returns. He said: I emailed them to you! mouhhaahaaa
(She probably deleted them like the other emails!)
commented 2016-09-30 03:13:14 -0400
Andrew how does Hillary know how much tax Trump paid?
commented 2016-09-30 03:12:17 -0400
Andrew funny you should claim conspiracy theories when it comes to Clinton , she has used the term “vast right wing conspiracy” how many times? And she lied during the debate. OH sorry is that conspiracy theory?
commented 2016-09-30 02:11:47 -0400
Why go after conspiracy theories, when there is just so much real dirt on Clinton?
commented 2016-09-30 00:14:53 -0400
And don’t get me started on her conscientious handling of classified documents. When sharing intelligence with the U.S., America’s allies can rest assured that a Hillary presidency will not leave their information and sources exposed to hostile agents.
commented 2016-09-30 00:03:19 -0400
I agree, Hillary is awesome under stress… so long as that black guy is there to reassure her. And pat her on the back. And tell her what to say next.
commented 2016-09-29 22:45:08 -0400
LOL, more alt-right nonsense. You don’t even need conspiracies to explain Trump’s poor performance, he just didn’t bother doing his homework (was there a SINGLE talking point made in that debate that wasn’t easily anticipated on either side? Difference is … Clinton actually planned for it).

That this comes from Breitbart and infowars, both well known alt-right mouthpieces with a fondness for implausible conspiracy theories, tells you all you need to know. The answer is, yes, Clinton prepared her talking points in advance. She is also far better at talking under pressure. Trump didn’t, he made it up on the fly, and tends to go on meandering diatribes (making claims that are often blatantly wrong) when under pressure.

No need to worry about reflections. Regardless, a man who so completely falls apart in stressful situations, no matter the cause, should not be president.
commented 2016-09-29 21:35:16 -0400
No she wasn’t wired,she was delivered the debate questions a week before , one of her aids was spotted dressed as a fed ex employee.
She had hand signals worked out with the moderator, they both ganged up on Trump.
I saw this on video, a shot from behind her, showing a built in teleprompter on her podium, when the debate was over and she walked away, the light went dim, Trump had no such light, ( video below)
She had a lump under her jacket at the back, with wires showing, it is summized it was to release medication during the debate.
After the debate CNN of course showed Hitlery winning big, 30 other polls showed Trump winning in 27 of them. ( video below with polls)
CNN as usual polled twice the number of Dems as repub. by their own admission.
Actually Trump did very well, she giggles through the whole thing, Trump tried to be nice but she kept trying to bait him to try bring out the former nasty Trump but he was smart enough not to take the bait.
She has rehearsed for 30 years, polished her lies to sound like truth, all in all considering the lopsidedness of the two candidates ( meaning her polished experience at lying ), he did very well.
But next time he wont be so nice, she played her hand that she wants to be nasty.
One big joke is the beauty pageant girl she brought up and is using as a poster child, turns out she is a porno star.
She can lie with a smile.( Hitlery)
Only the gullible get sucked in by that evil witch.She is n’t just above the law ,she runs the law and answers to no one and no one will go after her.
she should be in jail, for so many things she has done
All the mainstream media is protecting her, google search is protecting her, all the rich elites are pouring money into her campaign to try stop Trump, George Soros. holly wood.
Even Obama is scared, months ago he said with a smile, Trump will never be President, well now it looks like he could be.
Just today the feds came up and said those bogey men the Russians are hacking into the voting system so you know that is code for the government to oversee the election and rig it to make sure the most evil person in the world gets elected.
What is our little boy leader going to do if she gets in and Obama’s plans for a borderless world comes into being where we lose our sovereign nation and the so does the US and the world is one huge borderless world, he will never see his son become Prime Minister and Trudeau would sell Canada up the river in a minute.
Videos below pertain to what i said re hand signals to moderator polls after deabate

This is interesting reading

Enough for now i guess, there is so much to say about that evil woman
commented 2016-09-29 20:13:55 -0400
“Ron Voss commented 18 mins ago
Was Hillary Wired For Trump Debate?
Just conspiracy theory?”

Yes, just conspiracy theory.

Oh, look. WND looks like another alt-right site. Funny how they’re the only ones propagating the latest in a series of dubious conspiracies.

“Bill Elder commented 1 hour ago
How Reuters “Tweaked” Its Latest Poll (Again) To Show A Clinton Lead "
Yet you take the web poll at Time at face value … LOL.
commented 2016-09-29 19:49:49 -0400
The best way to get rid of Liberal Socialist Marxist, is to require that all voters pass an IQ test before being allowed to vote.
commented 2016-09-29 19:05:49 -0400
A young Joan of Arc Clinton Alinskyian,1vKniv
Saul Alinsky, socialist and considered (other than Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs) the father of political correctness.
This is where the REAL political correctness came from and Saul Alinsky was a devotee of Gramsci, though he never came out and declared himself a Marxist.
We have become what Lukacs set out to make our society.
commented 2016-09-29 19:02:06 -0400
The polls that show Clinton leading have been proven fraudulent in their sampling method by polling more declared Democrat respondents as GOP supporters – They got caught using fudged sample sets that includs Reuters,NPR, CNN, MSNBC and others. You know polling is being corrupted when you see numbers differ so widely between sources.

This is The Tavistock Institute system of misuse of Public Opinion Polls. Dating back to 1913, the Tavistock Institute used polls to shape public opinion into accepting Britain’s entry into World War I.

The plan to ‘create’ public opinion through the fake reporting of bogus polling data began as a propaganda factory centered at Wellington House in London. Since then it has migrated to American politics big time.

John Coleman, the author was one of the the first political writers to call attention to the existence of Tavistock bogus polls and push polling. Subsequently, we learn from Coleman’s work that these manipulated polls were designed not to measure public opinion, but to shape public opinion.

One of the chief methods that unscrupulous pollsters use to report fake results is to select a biased sample. For example, if one is using phone samplings to gather voting preferences, one merely needs to target neighborhoods which historically favor one party over the other in order to get the predetermined results that one is looking for. This violates the principle of random selection of subjects to poll and this completely invalidates any survey results – or the sources using it. This was done throughout this election cycle by Dem partisan media pollsters.

None of this tampering or lying or negative propagandizing will save Clinton. The Dems are out of popular favor and the electorate wants a change.
commented 2016-09-29 18:50:37 -0400
How Reuters “Tweaked” Its Latest Poll (Again) To Show A Clinton Lead

the latest Reuters/Ipsos polling “tweak” is truly amazing. Having run out of options for slyly “tweaking” questions and categories to sway respondents in their preferred direction, Reuters has apparnetly resorted to blatant poll tampering by altering their polling samples to include a disproportionate number of democrats.
commented 2016-09-29 17:12:21 -0400
Bill, see the Ipsos Reid poll. The momentum has turned back.
commented 2016-09-29 16:42:14 -0400
Broke Obama and Hillery Clinton are both in the church of Alinskyism.
commented 2016-09-29 16:25:27 -0400
I don’t always agree with Ray but i will say he is a political expert. Professional politicians and experts ignore pre election polls – they are aware of the old Tavistock method of manufacturing public opinion with corrupted polling.

Trump is ahead in all the credible polling numbers and he has the momentum – momentum is important – but a week is a century in politics and he hasn’t crossed the finish line yet.
commented 2016-09-29 15:57:27 -0400
Good to see the Libertarian pulling votes from Clinton – she’s totally undeserving of the liberal center voter.
commented 2016-09-29 15:28:43 -0400
May Clinton the witch burn at the stake.