February 08, 2017

Social justice before science: BMA deems term “expectant mother” offensive to transgenders

David MenziesMission Specialist David Menzies
 

Is there a woman in your life who is currently pregnant? Well, please watch your language because apparently, it’s now offensive to call an ‘expectant mother” an “expectant mother”. So says no less an authority than the British Medical Association.

You might be wondering who could possibly take offence to the term “expectant mother”. Why, the transsexual community of course.

But wait – there’s more! You see, the BMA is going all-in when it comes to socially re-engineering commonplace language so that it’s less offensive and more inclusive.

Watch as I provide a few examples along with their “rationale” for this latest version of Newspeak.

As ridiculous as this is, let’s not miss the real tragedy of this communication guide - this politically-correct nonsense isn’t being concocted by some campus social justice warrior group but rather, the British Medical Association!

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-02-10 12:49:51 -0500
Elton Braun, Clearly you need to be taken into custody for a session or two of Trudeau Sensitivity Training so you can find the root cause of your hostility towards the trannie nut bars.
commented 2017-02-09 13:18:47 -0500
Who cares if it offends them. It’s certainly not going to change the fact, that women when they are pregnant are expecting a baby.
commented 2017-02-09 01:27:07 -0500
I wonder if they can find even one trans person to say that the term offends them?
commented 2017-02-09 00:11:45 -0500
BILL ELDER:
We have truly fallen.
Our society has fallen and has earned the shit-storm comin’ down the pike at us! Whether it’s Satan, Islam or the Globalists…

JAN G
I thought the first batch mostly got drowned like rats after they were kicked out of the garden – and we’re the second batch…
commented 2017-02-08 22:55:47 -0500
Dan Mancuso – Interesting the mention of pedophilia as a politically contested condition now seeing how many investigative sources cite pedophilia as the currency of 1 percenter power structures: politics, sports and entertainment industry even the church.
commented 2017-02-08 20:39:44 -0500
Dear God:
Would you please start over? I think something went wrong with the first batch.
Thanks
Yours truly,
commented 2017-02-08 20:05:41 -0500
Wasn’t that the BMA that was trying to get ANGER registered as a mental disorder?
Oh, no, the was the APA, the same guys who – oops – the same persons who tried to get pedophilia changed from a mental disorder – as it’s listed in the DSM – to a sexual orientation – just like they did homosexuality…I don’t know if they’re still working on the anger thing.
Professionals and experts! Ah, the modern age…
commented 2017-02-08 20:05:39 -0500
I am trying to figure out what a communication guide has to do with improving medical science. I don’t care what the BMA’s political views are, but I do think they should be spending their resources on medical science. There is no logic at all.
commented 2017-02-08 18:32:10 -0500
Thanks, David Menzies, for highlighting the complete idiocy of the British Medical Association. Just want to know when all of this madness is going to stop.
commented 2017-02-08 17:54:36 -0500
I find transsexuals clinically, psychologically and abnormally offensive.
commented 2017-02-08 17:25:30 -0500
Dear B M A ,
Forget it your hopeless !!!

Off topic

Happy birthday sister , you leftwing loonie , I know you come on here to see what I am saying about you and your kind , I hope you chock on your cake , or inhale one of those little wax candles , how many candles now – 66 or so , you old broad — ha ha ha ha , I’ll call you later , ha ha – yikes
commented 2017-02-08 17:08:52 -0500
Dear BMA – I hear your cry for help, but your problem is best served by clinical psychology and therapy for abnormal psychological development, not politics.