March 09, 2018

The transgender movement is ruining feminism

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

On last night's episode, I explained why feminists aligning with the transgender movement are making their own cause look ridiculous and turning people away.

A trans-woman, meaning a man who underwent surgery to look like a woman, is now President of the Quebec Women's Federation. "She" is not a woman, never has been, and this is not feminism.

The Canadian media is fully behind the transgender agenda, The Globe and Mail even ran a column defending men using women's change rooms. That's anti-woman and anti-feminist!

WATCH my video to see the stats the prove the feminist movement is alienating normal people who support women's rights but not the bizarre demands of the trans lobby.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-03-12 18:16:05 -0400
I see.
I wasn’t commenting on Theryn’s opinions, only on her looks and that I would refer to him as her.
commented 2018-03-12 12:26:14 -0400
Of course sex is physical. I was just parroting what some trans person said to me, as to show how it contrasts with what I believe in.

And Theryn needs to shut the hell up. God I can’t stand that belligerent loudmouth. Just another activist that calls using normal language as violence.
commented 2018-03-12 11:56:55 -0400
“So being a woman is not primarily physical.” says Space Moose.
Use your brain,
Being a woman is a chromosomal, biological fact. You are BORN with breasts that can lactate and a womb or you are born with a penis. One is male and one is female. You can’t get more physical than that.
I have no problem calling a man in a dress and makeup ‘she’ or a women who actually looks like a male, ‘he’ but Zir, they or otherkin, not so much. Pick a lane, of which there are only two. Any nuance or place in between those two choices is your business and your (not yours but anyone’s) business alone, please don’t make it mine.

Check out google images for Buck Angel, mentioned in Joe Rogan’s show. ‘He’ is a porn star apparently and believe me if I had to address this person I would address her as ‘he’. She looks like she could punch your lights out if you didn’t.
http://cdn3.pressroomvip.com/wp-content/uploads/buck-angel-twitter.jpg

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/gay-south-florida/k35odm/picture3325802/ALTERNATES/FREE_960/Young%20Buck.jpg

I would also address Theryn Meyer as ‘she’ no problem.
http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/05/lUKIlJGW-300×300.jpg

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/-zcWQQGSChanVeqYBKHvZiaHBRhLQhBbiQFz9RVHn95IQhxEt1pPc6HFVCa8TkAxAjfZHmBy-jiUoaSZMIIe4h2mAQ=w530-h297-p

Otherkin. NOT. I would try to get them some kind of medical intervention.
https://www.cam.ac.uk/sites/www.cam.ac.uk/files/inner-images/160708_otherkin_0.jpg

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=otherkin&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.vice.com%2Fvice%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Fmeta%2F2015%2F07%2F03%2Ffrom-dragons-to-foxes-the-otherkin-community-believes-you-can-be-whatever-you-want-to-be-1435922539.png

Gender queer, what ever that is. This guy looks like a boy dressed in women’s clothing. I’m not referring to him as ‘she’. I don’t think I would refer to him other than using his name, Bob, or Jane but not by any pronoun.
https://i.pinimg.com/236x/b3/7c/a5/b37ca53e86fb65b0bda058a955b000d7.jpg
commented 2018-03-12 03:09:03 -0400
That ‘bottom surgery’ as you put it can be pretty complicated. Think about it, you have to rebuilt where you pass water. I don’t imagine it is simple or without great risk and discomfort. I can understand why some don’t go for that part of the deal. That could mess you up for life. But if that is what someone wants to do its none of my business. When kids are involved I make it my business.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjbbK7BcOjk
Joe Rogan & Steven Crowder on Transgender Transitioning Controversy
warning: course language
commented 2018-03-12 02:24:50 -0400
At the end of the day, you need to draw the line somewhere. I draw the line at genitals, and yes, I think they can be surgically altered. I suppose I can give people that are born intersex some flexibility too. What I don’t agree with, is needing only self identification as a gender, to do things like use locker rooms, join teams, or to be a part of the scouts. On top of that, I don’t think that somebody just feeling like the other gender alone, is enough to make me have to call somebody by a certain pronoun, or to even have me consider them their gender of choice.

I once came across a trans gender. Male to female. This person wanted to do things like take hormones, get facial surgery, and even get fake boobs. BUt what this person would not do, is get bottom surgery. So I asked why bother with everything else if you don’t want to get bottom surgery. This person responded by saying that the most important thing, is for people to treat him like a woman.

So being a woman is not primarily physical. But rather, it is how we see that person. So it is my duty to treat that individual like a woman.
commented 2018-03-11 22:53:19 -0400
I think Andrew should ask Peterson. The simple logic of it would kill her. Andrew is a post modernist dream. I swear there is nothing she can’t twist around and throw back, but it takes too many turns to make any sense. Government mandated speech is compelled speech and not cool. The government might get away with stopping people from saying certain things, but they can’t force people to say what they want. This argument is about control. Control the language and you control the people. When a government makes it law to utter certain words or face penalty its time to say , not on my watch.

You can’t just make sht up. One generation doesn’t get to trash and redefine everything that came before. Rewriting, history and biology, trashing our roots and making it up as they go along. If you can’t wrap your head around anything Peterson says, I don’t think there is a level on which we can converse. Keep it away from public schools, libraries, don’t expect me to pay for your parades or put up with lewd public acts in front of children. And don’t ask the government to force me to say made up words, and then go and be what ever you want. Attempting to control the narrative by force will blow up in your faces.

Ideas so good they must be mandated are never good ideas. Sexualizing young children is also not a good idea and is supposed to be a crime. I don’t understand how it passes in a civilized society who’s first priority is supposed to be to protect children. Adults can do what ever they want, but leave those kids alone.

Look in the mirror Andrew if you want to see real moral vanity.
commented 2018-03-11 20:51:11 -0400
You can count on the system indoctrinating the kids to ensure that there will always be more leftists.
commented 2018-03-11 19:33:43 -0400
“Feminism” is an unnatural state and is self correcting. It’s simple demographics. "The closer a woman’s ties to modern third-wave feminism, the less likely it appears that she will reproduce herself. Those more distant from the movement (more conservative and religious populations) are, conversely, reproducing the most. The most loyal foot-soldiers of this movement are urban liberals. These people simply do not replace themselves, and sport some of the lowest fertility rates of any demographic.

They’re already slowly eroding themselves as a portion of the wider population, an action that has consequences in a democracy. I suspect that their failure to reproduce may not bode well for the persistence of their ideology, especially with their polar opposites multiplying so rapidly." In a generation or two they will be gone.
commented 2018-03-11 03:42:19 -0400
The left believes that gender is just made up. And then they redefine sex in the most absurd way possible. It is not about what organs you have. It is about how you identify yourself and your hormone level.

I admit there is a part of me that gets a chuckle out of all of this. The girls only club does not get to be so gender exclusive any more.

On a sidenote, anybody here watch Family Guy? I love the episode where Quagmire’s dad gets a sex change. The left thinks this episode is the most offensive thing ever. I don’t blame Brian for throwing up.
commented 2018-03-11 01:20:00 -0500
Andrew so is it fine for MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes to tell others they cannot speak because of how she DEFINES them?
commented 2018-03-11 01:17:59 -0500
Andrew my gun identifies as a water pistol so i see no need to register it. Now don’t force your pronoun on it.
commented 2018-03-11 01:16:02 -0500
Tammie great question, you will not get a rational answer.
commented 2018-03-11 01:15:18 -0500
Andrew Stephenson Peterson is calling them what they ARE!! Just because you think you are Superman does not mean you can fly.
commented 2018-03-11 01:14:23 -0500
Andrew respect is a 2 way street. Now tell me why i should respect people who join a parade to wiggle their dick in front of kids in public? Or when they stop using the term Cisgender i will show more respsect back. And when they crap on anyone who disagrees. AND THEY GET SPECIAL RIGHTS! NO ONE HAS TO KISS THEIR ASS LIKE YOU THINK! Also please tell me how we are supposed to know which of the 32 genders they are? Please enlighten me?? I will call them by their names, not by their imagined gender.
commented 2018-03-10 19:49:29 -0500
I can let slide trans people who get surgery and become the other sex. Though I will admit they are not 100 percent their new gender.

What I do not agree with, is the argument that you are the gender you identify as. Just feeling like a gender does not make you that gender. So when you get accused of mis gendering, then that is where the identity politics go too far. I am not simply going to let somebody tell me what pronouns to use on feelings alone.
commented 2018-03-10 18:39:14 -0500
Sorry Andrew, your history shows otherwise. Not feeding your monomania.

Have a nice evening.
commented 2018-03-10 17:36:33 -0500
Acknowledgement isn’t “mania”.

“Your comments below are truly bizarre….”
Which was the intent – if you change the direction of an argument subtly, and it becomes ridiculous, it might suggest the original itself is hardly on firm ground.

First comment – Peterson has decided he, alone, can decide the best pronoun to refer to people by, whether or not it is preferred or accurate. Is it thus unreasonable for me to do the same when referring to her? What distinguishes the two scenarios beyond your own personal political biases? I am merely doing what he does.

Second – if you are against “compelled” speech, which is to say, you can be punished for using prejudicial language against certain groups of individual based on outward identity or appearance, is it reasonable to differentiate based upon the target of said prejudicial comment? Why or why not? If it’s OK to make islamophobic or transphobic comments, should he not be arguing in favour of anti-semitic, christianophobic, and racist terms as well? Why or why not?
commented 2018-03-10 17:13:35 -0500
Andrew, I consider you a member of a faction which is pushing transmania and it’s not welcome by me or many other people.

Your comments below are truly bizarre….
“*Apparently, I’m not compelled to use her preferred pronoun. This is apparently “destroying” "SJW"s. Take that, evil EssJayDubyews!
Incidentally, does she insist it’s her right to use *n*rs" to describe people of African descent? Or is her compelled speech argument solely about gender?"
commented 2018-03-10 15:53:02 -0500
“liza rosie commented 2018-03-10 12:23:50 -0500
Here we go again, Andrew, if you knew one damn thing about the Jordan Peterson issue with trans you would know it was about compelled speech and not human rights. Don’t waste my time.

Look I feel sorry for transgender people. I think they need help, I won;t deny it. I want gender studies kept out of primary schools, absolutely. "

Then don’t lie to us and tell us you support “equal rights”. It’s virtue signaling, and insincere virtue signaling at that. Either you believe it’s an expression equally valid and equivalent to others, or you don’t.

Peterson spins it as one-sided, solely about compelled speech, but he also happens to ignore the other side – which is that he respects pronoun choice only for those who he has decided are representing themselves in a way he feels is appropriate. Which is to say, that he feels that representative pronouns are only for cisgendered individuals. This is not “equal”.

It’s not even about “compelled” speech, any more than prohibitions on other slurs are. It’s about respect. Disagree with their choices all you want, but at least acknowledge they have the right to make them.

“As it is, you misrepresent him whenever possible”
What am I misrepresenting? He doesn’t respect the choices of others. I skimmed her* book at the airport, and found it about as interesting as Hillary Clinton’s book, mostly navel gazing and babbling about nothing. I suppose if you buy that crap, it’s near-biblical, but I find that sort of thing tiresome.
*Apparently, I’m not compelled to use her preferred pronoun. This is apparently “destroying” "SJW"s. Take that, evil EssJayDubyews!

Incidentally, does she insist it’s her right to use *n*rs" to describe people of African descent? Or is her compelled speech argument solely about gender?
commented 2018-03-10 14:53:19 -0500
f you look like a man. I will say good morning Sr. A woman good morning Ms.
I am not going to investigate. How did this get so …..
commented 2018-03-10 13:46:02 -0500
Transmania is what ideologues try to sell as normal. Not buying what you’re peddling Andrew.
BTW, I think if you get a copy of 12 Rules for Life and read it, you would actually learn something from Dr. Jordan Peterson and his philosophy. As it is, you misrepresent him whenever possible, repeating what you may have read on far left blogs etc…
commented 2018-03-10 12:23:50 -0500
Here we go again, Andrew, if you knew one damn thing about the Jordan Peterson issue with trans you would know it was about compelled speech and not human rights. Don’t waste my time.

Look I feel sorry for transgender people. I think they need help, I won;t deny it. I want gender studies kept out of primary schools, absolutely. I stand by everything I have said and if you think my stance is hateful then you have redefined that word as well. I’m not playing.
commented 2018-03-10 11:20:11 -0500
“Muta Ween commented 2018-03-10 08:09:09 -0500
Let’s presume that I belonged to a golf or health club and decided I felt like a women today and started using the women’s lockeroom. Would they phone the police and have me arrested "

Would you be? Probably not, unless you start acting like a creep.

“liza rosie commented 2018-03-09 19:23:12 -0500
Dianne sounds like she just hits and runs.
No one is saying transgender people don’t have the same rights as everyone else. Just that they shouldn’t have any special ones.”

The problem is, that although this is said, it doesn’t play out in practice. Witness, for example, the popularity of Jordan Peterson, who rose to fame deriding trans or non-binary individuals in a way that no cis-gendered individual would ever be subjected to. You vocally advocate against sex ed that supports gender diversity. You support the claims that they are “delusional” or otherwise mentally irregular, marginalizing them for their identity in a way that again, no “normal” person would ever have to deal with. This is not “equal rights” – how you can say that while advocating for continued marginalization boggles the mind.
commented 2018-03-10 08:09:09 -0500
Let’s presume that I belonged to a golf or health club and decided I felt like a women today and started using the women’s lockeroom. Would they phone the police and have me arrested ? Should men who think they are women stage a sit down strike inside women’s lockerooms?
If criminals can just arbitrarily decide they want to be imprisoned in a female detention centre ,why can’t I be afforded the same right?
As usual these whackos create these ridiculous scenarios that have zero practicality in the real world.
Female teachers ,lawyers ,doctors ,businesswomen and especially left wing female journalists that promote this no gender agenda should be exposed in terms of practicing what they preach.
commented 2018-03-10 03:00:35 -0500
Can’t say I have ever tried on one of those prosthetic penises.