August 28, 2018

Theresa May supports South Africa land expropriation

Jack BuckbyRebel Contributor

During a trip to South Africa, British PM Theresa May confirmed her support for South Africa’s land expropriation.

It’s ok though guys, don’t worry! May said that Britain supports it as long as it’s done fairly and legally.

So racism and hatred towards white people is cool as long as it’s "democratic"… or something.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-08-29 12:28:36 -0400
Wow.. well said Robert.. it is frightening how people are so easily fooled by what days people are willing to go to bat for… Like women clergy gay/ trans equally and a whole host of other shit that doesn’t cost money or rock the boat with the globalists.!! Well said.
commented 2018-08-29 02:39:29 -0400
Theresa May is not a radical, nor a “leftie”. A liberal progressive and neo-liberal worldview defines the Tory (UK Conservative) government.
Liberal progressives like Theresa May will never challenge the prevailing uber-capitalist socio-economic consensus. They will agitate for women bishops, for a gay married clergy, for “an end to racism”, and for gay and “trans” super-equality, etc., because these “progressive” reforms do not cost money; nor do they challenge vested (uber-capitalist) economic interests.
Liberal progressives like Theresa May will step over and around people denied all help from social security (welfare) and so poor that they are living in cardboard boxes on the pavement, and think nothing of it, but they will shout loud and long about the wrongs of (largely imaginary) unequal pay-packages for women. They will shriek with righteous anger at societies abroad in which gays are not yet allowed to marry. They will argue hotly that only gay bishops (in a Church of England/Episcopalian Church of Scotland of which almost no-one is a member anymore, and about which very few of us could care less), “married” to same sex partners, will redress society’s wrongs.
It does not surprise me in the least that Theresa May (and the many people in Britain just like her) feels unmoved by the plight of white South African farmers, and indeed, lends the South African government her support in its land seizures policies.
But this does not make her a radical or a left winger. Economically, she is an uber-capitalist, and she regards the poor with utter scorn. A socialist redistribution of wealth in Britain is not a Tory government aim.
commented 2018-08-29 00:55:37 -0400
It just struck me that Theresa May is Britain’s answer to our Boy Blunder… She just tends to be a bit more articulate in English… But equally wrong…
commented 2018-08-28 23:03:42 -0400
You don’t understand the new world order. They have to destroy everything that came from whites first to rebuild a 4th world where everybody will be equally poor.
commented 2018-08-28 21:50:01 -0400
Theresa May is a racist. Instead of being concerned about injustice, she throws the victims of black racism under the proverbial bus. And as Jack points out, these farmers aren’t compensated. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Since it’s wrong to dispossess black farmers, why is it all right to dispossess white farmers? Let them be compensated for the loss of their land rather than being forced off by black gangs of thugs.
commented 2018-08-28 19:36:59 -0400
I take the liberty of quoting from my Blog entry (4 March ‘18) “Some Observations on Land Ownership in Scotland and South Africa.” In this piece I show why “land restitution” in South Africa is not the simple matter the liberal-progressives and left wingers in Europe like to paint it as. (My Blog can be found by Googling rabbiedeoir+blog).
“When, from the mid-17th century onwards, European settlers began arriving in today’s Western Cape, the indigenous occupants (variously referred to as “Hottentots”, Khoi-Khoi, Strandlopers, and Khoi San), were few in numbers, and within a relatively short while they had been eliminated by European diseases to which they had no resistance, by liquor, by outright enslavement, by periodic genocidal campaigns, and by straight-forward displacement to the north.
Their descendants, today, would be impossible to trace, locate or establish with any certainty.
Of course, the Blacks themselves had not yet arrived in the Western Cape when the first European settlers began seizing the land from its indigenous occupants. The Black people (sometimes referred to in history books as the “Bantu tribes”), whose ancestors had originated in central and eastern Africa, and who had been pushing south for many generations, only reached today’s Eastern Cape (where the present-day East London and Port Elizabeth, Grahamstown, Queenstown, King Williamstown, and other such urban centres, are located), in the latter 18th century – by which time, of course, European settlers had thoroughly settled the lands further south, as well as reaching up as far north along the Cape’s west coast as today’s southern Namibia.
For European farmers south of the Fish River in the Eastern Cape, and south of the Orange River in the hinterland, to “return the land” to the descendants of black people whose tribes had not yet occupied those lands at the time they were first being settled by Europeans, would hardly constitute any just form of restitution.
And as for the lands in the South African hinterland, only settled by Europeans after the Zulus had already slaughtered the majority of these lands’ black occupants, leaving the land largely untenanted (the cattle, and the surviving women and children, having been seized and removed by the Zulu impis): to whom today do they belong?
It is always a very dangerous business in Africa seeking to establish who owes whom restitution."
commented 2018-08-28 19:32:45 -0400
KEITH BARNES commented:
Karan, Surely India is a Democracy, is it not?

Sure Keith India is a democratic state (run by socialist govt.) but I don’t think you would like to see that kind of democracy in Canada. Unless you’ve lived under third world country style democracy, you could never appreciate the western democratic states.
In reality it’s not a democracy, it’s a mockery of democracy where corruption reigns supreme, political morality has disappeared, administration is as unprincipled as it could be, culture is progressing backwards and general population is unethical.

Here’s a fresh example of Indian style democracy being practiced in Canada:
commented 2018-08-28 18:47:41 -0400
Perhaps somebody should explain ‘Live Burial’ to Ms May.
commented 2018-08-28 18:44:12 -0400
KARAN SINGH commented 24 mins ago.
I’m a person of non-white ethnicity

Karan, Surely India is a Democracy, is it not?
commented 2018-08-28 18:37:24 -0400
STEPHEN HICKEN commented 2 hours ago
she’s a leftist…………
Stephen, she is a bloody Marxist….NWO too Boot.
commented 2018-08-28 18:17:18 -0400
I’m a person of non-white ethnicity and I’ve a question for all the people of colour (non-whites) reading this, who condone such actions in the name of reparation, fairness, equality, etc. by marxist controlled govt. in western countries (including Canada):
We (people from non-white under developed countries) came here because we found these countries populated & administered by whites to be worth living. Once these countries are handed over to the people who couldn’t develop their own societies & countries beyond imitating, to their best level, the western culture & its progress, where would you go after these are countries are destroyed & brought to the same level as your own societies & countries?
commented 2018-08-28 17:47:39 -0400
South Africa now becomes another Zimbabwe.
commented 2018-08-28 16:59:01 -0400
Hugo Chavez nationalized ( seized) businesses and private property and gave it back to the people he thought it was stolen from.
And not knowing what to do with their new found wealth and bounty, they proceeded to devalue and destroy it.
Hard to run a refinery when someone’s stolen all the pumps.
May is wacko. And South Africa will devolve into chaos.
commented 2018-08-28 16:55:52 -0400
I don’t think she even knows what is really going on. She is just plain stupid.
commented 2018-08-28 16:44:04 -0400
Of course she supports it… She was told to.!!
commented 2018-08-28 16:41:11 -0400
Wait a minute, didn’t the Nazis have a similar approach? Hey, this is all strictly legal. Damn, she is a National Socialist after all Stephen.
commented 2018-08-28 16:37:06 -0400
So racism is okay as long as it is legal? Gee, I really have to think about that one. You are right Jack, she is a coward and a appeaser or in other words a modern day Conservative leader.
commented 2018-08-28 16:29:18 -0400
she’s a leftist