September 23, 2017

Trend emerges from M-103 hearings: Imaginary racism lays foundation for real censorship

David MenziesMission Specialist

Hearings for Liberal MP Iqra Khalid’s “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103 have begun and after only a few days of testimony, things are already getting downright disturbing.

Liberal MP Heddy Fry who lied about cross burnings in Prince George, British Columbia, heads the committee, which in some ways makes her the perfect choice.

After all, she’s an expert when it comes to alerting Canadians to problems of intolerance that don’t exist and now she’s chairing a committee for a problem of intolerance that doesn’t exist.

We still don’t have a definition for “Islamophobia”, a term coined in the ’90’s by the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist organization as a way to advance Sharia law.

Far from being merely a feel-good, toothless motion condemning discrimination, M-103 lays a foundation that may lead to censorship laws curtailing freedom of speech based on the hurt feelings of one particular group.

The most disturbing testimony came from Michel Juneau-Katsuya, a former CSIS and RCMP officer who said this about Quebec media:

“Multiple times Quebec hosts have been guilty, if I may use that word of racism, bigotry, etc., what are we waiting to pull a license away from those guys?”

He then went on to criticize what’s known as “trash radio”, the descriptor given to Quebec radio stations that swing right of centre.

Even The Rebel got a mention as a site that another former law enforcement officer suggested was “amplifying the voices of the extreme right”.

Like so-called “trash radio” stations, we might need to be shut down in the name of “keeping the peace.” We wouldn’t want to incite a peace-loving group that is prone to violence if their sensibilities are offended.

It’s hard not to see how the stars are aligning.

A committee headed up by a progressive who sees imaginary racism is listening to testimony from ex-law enforcement advocating that media outlets that go “too far” in their criticism of Islam should perhaps be consigned to the slaughterhouse of political correctness.

What could possibly go wrong for the future of free speech in Canada?

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-09-24 18:46:47 -0400
According to Islamic tradition (the Hadith: Bukhari: 4,52,288) Muhammad’s last words were, “There should be no other religions besides Islam in Arabia” and that money should continue to be paid to influence the foreign ambassadors.

Is this still being done here in Canada?
commented 2017-09-24 17:41:45 -0400
There are no more words for trudeau..the liberals..or the usual Political Party’s of Canada. All of their actions or non action speaks volumes..Anti Canadian and anti Humanitarian..
commented 2017-09-24 15:42:08 -0400
“Here why we need the m103 bill to remove these trouble makers from out meetings.”

https://youtu.be/LHQaL6kRDtc

Now lets get about 25 people to attend and speak out one a time so that our voices can be heard.
II Corinthians 10:3
3 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: 4 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) 5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ; 6 And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled. 7 Do ye look on things after the outward appearance?
commented 2017-09-24 15:17:26 -0400
RON JOSEPH, every time I hear MSM and our illustrious political leaders refer to the far right as more dangerous than Islamists, it puts me in mind of a particular scene from the movie, Monty Python and the Holy Grail. It’s the scene where King Arthur battles the Black Knight. When King Arthur chops off the Black Knight’s arm, he claims victory. However, when the fact that his arm is missing is pointed out to the Black Knight, he looks down at the bleeding stump and says, “No it isn’t”. Everybody on the planet knows that Islam is the most dangerous threat to peace and to life in the world today, possibly being equaled only by that mad man, Kim Jong-un. They all know it. The evidence is staring them in the face every day, all day, every which way they turn, but they’re all terrified of being the first to point it out. They are ALL behaving precisely as the citizens did in that Hans Christian Andersen novel, The Emperor’s New Clothes…. Except for a few select traitors of course…. like Justin Trudeau and Iqra Khalid, who both probably want to see Canada under Sharia law, and those who don’t follow it, subject to the penalties provided for under Sharia law. I don’t believe this is an opinion, I believe it’s an irrefutable fact. There’s no other logical way to explain it.
commented 2017-09-24 13:50:52 -0400
DAVID JOHN PEIRCE:

1. Thanks for the historical numbers killed by mohammedan invaders.
In the figure of 280 million killed by mohammedans I would also like to add the numbers of indonesians, malaysians, filipinos killed by mohammedan barbarians. Prior to mohammedan invasion of the far east during the 14th & 15th century the whole region was staunchly hindu or buddhist. (The remote island of Bali in indonesia is still majority hindu). Till 1970’s (before the influence of oil dollars spread worldwide) most of the malaysian & indonesian muslims had hindu/buddhist sounding names. Even in modern times their last names are derived from hindu culture and are based on sanskrit/pali language.

2. The massacre of Bibighar in Bithoor/Cawnpore (modern day Kanpur), on 15th of July 1857, was perpetrated & executed by mohammedans. Although the city of Bithoor & Cawnpore and the rebel forces were in nominal control of a maratha brahmin named Nana Sahib he had no direct hand in the massacre. The actual players were Azimullah Khan, his prime minister, and a prostitute from Cawnpore; Hussaini Begum. Azimullah Khan was an orphan who was raised & educated by christian missionaries in Cawnpore. On his visit to England in 1856 he was given a warm welcome & became intimate with several english aristocrat ladies. His real purpose to visit Europe was to garner support from mohammedan ottoman empire to invade India, throw the British East India Company out & restore muslim Mughal empire in India. Albeit, Nana Sahib was not guiltless as to say because on the day of 27th June 1857 he personally ordered & oversaw the massacare of Satichura Ghat in Cawnpore, where within a span of couple of hours 200 unarmed British soldiers were hacked to death and 120 British women & children were taken prisoner.
Another dark chapter of mohammedan barbarianism is the ‘Black Hole Tragedy’ on 26th of June 1756 at Fort William in Calcutta perpetrated by the local mohammedan Nawab Siraj-ud-Daula.
Then there’s the most disgusting episode of mohammedan treachery & savagery; the ghazis (afghan jihadis) on order from Dost Mohammad, who has already agreed to William Elphinstone on peaceful retreat of British Troops, on 6th of January 1842 murdered 4,500 unarmed British soldiers, along with 12,000 of their indian camp followers while several hundred British women & children were captured & never heard of again. The corpses of murdered soldiers were further desecrated by afghan women by cutting their genitals & stuffing it in their mouth. None of the bodies were buried or cremated.
commented 2017-09-24 13:30:06 -0400
Thanks for the links David.

People are being tricked by Trudeau and his gang of fools. Don’t be one them..
commented 2017-09-24 13:22:41 -0400
Jay you are a bigot of Canadians so take a flying leap off a building and see if you can fly . All this bull shit is just that and this pussy Prime minister needs to be fired ….
This country is going down the shitter fast and the number one reason LIBERALS DICTATORS .
commented 2017-09-24 13:15:13 -0400
https://vimeo.com/233767389
Impacts of M-103 on Free Speech

There is no such thing as freedom of speech in Islamic law. There is only the law of slander.
Literal quote from Islamic law: The law of slander is anything that a Muslim would dislike. Including the truth.
commented 2017-09-24 12:48:33 -0400
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt—-Sorry Tammie, I failed to mention that the Conservative Hot Line for concerned Canadians is only open M-F.

Maurice Potvin—-I have also noticed the MSM is insinuating that White Supremacists (also calling them Far Right) are much more dangerous than the Islamic murderers. It would be great to throw a couple numbers at ordinary people in a discussion.
My guess would be since 9/11, Islamic killers 230,000 deaths. White Supremacists 0001 death.
commented 2017-09-24 12:43:26 -0400
Is it racist to point out real racism with facts and stats? Is it racist to paint a tolerant country as systemically racist? Is ‘tolerance’ a matter of opinion? Are a group of people who all follow the teachings of one man , which include every race and skin colour in existence a race or a cult/ideology with members of many races?
There is at this time in history no systemic racism in Canada, that seems to be a fact. However a growing distrust of a group of imported people from all over the globe who all follow the same ideology and wish to take precedence in our country and threaten our culture, traditions and political stability may change Canada from one of the most tolerant into one which is less tolerant like France.(see map in link below)

I would also like to ask, how much of this growth in classified intolerance in countries flooded with this ideology, is due to infighting among the recent ‘citizens’/immigrants/refugees and how much of it is ‘xenophobia’ if you will.
Finally is it reasonable or unreasonable for a country irrevocably marred and changed by a tipped demographic from Muslim countries, to NOT be slightly upset by what can only be classified as an invasion?
It seems to me if a western people were interested in living in an Islamic country they would have moved to one. Is that racist? xenophobic?
Is that Islamophobic? I don’t want to live in an Islamic country so I must be Islamophobic? If that is the case I am indeed guilty as charged.
commented 2017-09-24 12:16:11 -0400
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/189837/muslim-countries-are-most-racist-world-daniel-greenfield

MUSLIM COUNTRIES ARE THE MOST RACIST IN THE WORLD
While most Western countries surveyed are not racist, most Muslim countries surveyed are very racist.

“The most racist: These include Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Bangladesh, Iran, Turkey, Algeria, Morocco, Mali and Malaysia. The only Western country on that list is France.

Meanwhile the most tolerant countries in the world include United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Britain, Sweden, Norway, Latvia, Australia, New Zealand.

What do they have in common? Not a single one of them is Muslim.

Figures like these have serious implications for a multicultural society being constructed with Muslim immigration. It is rather clear that importing large numbers of Muslim immigrants does not lead to tolerance. It leads to intolerance. Tellingly, France, the only Western country on the racist list, has been subjected to large scale Muslim settlement leading to conflict and violence."
commented 2017-09-24 12:06:31 -0400
J. Bissonnette, that is amazing. The statute of limitations is considered expired after two years? I hope some recent recordings can be obtained to show proof of what everyone knows goes on every Friday in many Mosques across Canada. We have to be holding these Imams to account for calling for violence and death to Jews and all kafir.
commented 2017-09-24 12:01:14 -0400
Tammie I didn’t think terrorists had a sense of humour. "There is a screen shot of Abu Bakr Al-Baghadi’s tweet. Notice his screen handle is @GaysCantFly. "
commented 2017-09-24 09:41:57 -0400
Jay Kelly, when is the government going to insist that those Imam’s giving hate sermons in mosques, calling for the death of non-muslims etc…be charged under the Criminal Code? When will moques and cultural centres promoting violence/radicalizing congregants be closed?
commented 2017-09-24 08:48:12 -0400
Jay Kelly, let me boil it down for you. People deserve protection from bigotry and discrimination; ideologies of all stripes can be criticized in a free and democratic society.
Iqra Khalid’s motion is a precursor to pass laws to criminalize criticism of Islam and Sharia Law. This is happening worldwide as the OIC makes up a huge voting block at the UN and has been running this agenda since 1990. Khalid didn’t define Islamophobia and I think you need to research who is responsible for coining this term, and why. The Muslim Brotherhood have a long reach, and, unfortunately, it is well established in Canada.

The majority of Canadians oppose such restrictions on speech, and, object to the wording of this motion or the government recognizing/ supporting Islamic supremacy. We have laws already which prohibit discrimination or hate crimes. Her motion depicts Canada as a nation rampant with discrimination etc…when in fact it’s not. Go back and read the motion in it’s entirety, also, go back to the E-411,and read that nonsense. Remember, there were only 79 MP’s in the House the day the petition was accepted.

Rebel didn’t “attack” Khalid, reporting facts and reactions by Canadians is not against the law; for now!

Jay, have a look at the video below. This blogger is also presenting facts.
“MP’s in the Canadian House of Commons recently passed the highly controversial m-103. According to a recent Angus Reid Institute poll, 59% of Canadians who had an opinion said they were OPPOSED to the motion. Chillingly, one group strongly in favor of the new motion is ISIS, whose leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi tweeted out the groups approval, and congratulated miss Khalid on her effective use of taqiyya in getting the motion approved.”

There is a screen shot of Abu Bakr Al-Baghadi’s tweet. Notice his screen handle is @GaysCantFly.
Sick isn’t it!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44sw_TjGcAM&t=0s&spfreload=5
commented 2017-09-24 08:07:22 -0400
Ron Joseph, thanks for posting the telephone number, I will be calling tomorrow morning.
commented 2017-09-24 07:35:59 -0400
https://www.mimimatthews.com/2015/12/06/the-bibighar-massacre-the-darkest-days-of-the-indian-rebellion-of-1857/

The above clips tell the story of what can happen even now.

“The British women and children were ordered to come out of the assembly rooms, but they refused to do so and clung to each other. They barricaded themselves in, tying the door handles with clothing. At first, around twenty rebel soldiers opened fire from the outside of the Bibighar, firing through holes in the boarded windows. The soldiers of the squad that was supposed to fire the next round were disturbed by the scene, and discharged their shots into the air. Soon after, upon hearing the screams and groans inside, the rebel soldiers declared that they were not going to kill any more women & children.”

“An angry Begum Hussaini Khanum denounced the sepoys’ act as cowardice, and asked her aide to finish the job of killing the captives.5 Khan hired butchers, who murdered the captives with cleavers; the butchers left when it seemed that all the captives had been killed. However, a few women and children had managed to survive by hiding under the other dead bodies. It was agreed that the bodies of the victims would be thrown down a dry well by some sweepers. The next morning the rebels arrived to dispose of the bodies and they found that three women who were still alive, and also three stark naked children aged between four and seven years old .3 The surviving women were cast into the well by the sweepers, who had also been told to strip the corpses. The sweepers then threw the three little boys into the well one at a time, the youngest first. Some victims, among them small children, were therefore buried alive in a heap of butchered corpses.”6
commented 2017-09-24 07:03:34 -0400
Tears of Jihad
Mar 3 2008 | by Bill Warner These figures are a rough estimate of the death of non-Muslims by the political act of jihad.

Africa
Thomas Sowell [Thomas Sowell, Race and Culture, BasicBooks, 1994, p. 188] estimates that 11 million slaves were shipped across the Atlantic and 14 million were sent to the Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. For every slave captured many others died. Estimates of this collateral damage vary. The renowned missionary David Livingstone estimated that for every slave who reached a plantation, five others were killed in the initial raid or died of illness and privation on the forced march.[Woman’s Presbyterian Board of Missions, David Livingstone, p. 62, 1888] Those who were left behind were the very young, the weak, the sick and the old. These soon died since the main providers had been killed or enslaved. So, for 25 million slaves delivered to the market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa.
120 million Africans

Christians
The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-10] . A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in wars by jihad. So counting the million African Christians killed in the 20th century we have:
60 million Christians

Hindus
Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, Negationism in India, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”
80 million Hindus

Buddhists
Buddhists do not keep up with the history of war. Keep in mind that in jihad only Christians and Jews were allowed to survive as dhimmis (servants to Islam) everyone else had to convert or die. Jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India. The total is roughly 10 million. [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-1.] 10 million Buddhists

Jews
Oddly enough there were not enough Jews killed in jihad to significantly affect the totals of the Great Annihilation. The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective, but the numbers were in the thousands, not millions. After that, the Jews submitted and became the dhimmis (servants and second class citizens) of Islam and did not have geographic political power.

This gives a rough estimate of 270 million killed by jihad.
commented 2017-09-24 04:23:32 -0400
Emiel Robertson, yes it would indeed be interesting to post those numbers since 9-11; not just for the alt right and the white supremacists, but also for all other religious faiths and ideologies, including communism and secular humanism. I know there have definitely been some acts of violence committed in the name of Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists in that time frame, but very few. There have also been many acts of violence committed in Communists Regimes against their own people under the cloak of secrecy, I`m sure. As for white supremacists, as disgusting as they are, I haven`t heard of them killing anyone in the last 30 years. I would like to report those numbers you ask for, Emiel, and I`ve tried to find reliable sources for that information, but those exact numbers are much harder to come by. I`d have to be doing research 24-7, and I`ve got other things to do with my life. Please feel free to do the research yourself though. I won`t be offended.
commented 2017-09-24 04:08:07 -0400
pulled off utube its a good one to watch.

https://youtu.be/y7ojKL8A7qQ
Ex-Muslim Woman Told The Truth About Islam And What She’s Telling Will Shock You
851,366 views
8K
2K
Share
God Is Love
Published on Feb 18, 2017
An Interview by Kevin J. Johnston With A Former Muslim Woman (Sandra Solomon)
Official’s Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/KevinJac
Web: http://www.kevinjackaljohnston.com

I am not own of this interview and video or making business or money, all credit goes to Kevin J. Johnston.

Music:
Subheim – Away
Elfakir Instrumental
Deus Ex – Sarif Industries (NON-COPYRIGHT Version)

Subscribe and like my page on facebook
https://www.facebook.com/DailyYeshua

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
commented 2017-09-24 03:55:08 -0400
https://youtu.be/XGWyRdsIIg8
Prime Minister Trudeau’s View on Evangelical Christianity
13,596 views
107
13
Share
Canadian Times NEWS
Published on Nov 13, 2015
commented 2017-09-24 03:42:09 -0400
Heritage Committee – September 20 Meeting

The 72nd meeting of the Heritage Committee entertained witness testimony from Tarek Fatah, Michel Juneau Katsuya and several representatives from the Ontario Human Rights Commission. An audio recording of the proceedings can be found below.

The proceedings were truly remarkable as Mr. Fatah spared no horses in detailing just how the “wool is being pulled over the eyes” of the Committee and the Canadian government in general. He was emphatic that the acceptance of Islamophobia as a form of religious discrimination was akin to denying Canadian Muslims the right to defend themselves from the religious bigots (mullahs) that they came to Canada to escape. He went on to state that hundreds of Canadian mosques are under the influence of extremist, Muslim Brotherhood operatives and, at one point, was upbraided by the Chair of the Committee herself for improper etiquette – he was speaking directly to the questioner rather than through the Chair. Mr. Fatah did not relent in his message that Islamophobia, as currently understood in Canadian parlance, is not what the Committee thinks it is. He stated that Muslims against Sharia Law were not held in the same esteem as Muslims who worked for the establishment of such law in Canada.

Mr. Katsuya was equally remarkable as he stated the greatest potential source of Canadian hate crimes and terrorism resided in a rising tide of “alt-right” forces. He offered no evidence for such a claim save for the Quebec mosque attack of 29 January, 2017. In this particular case, he offered no substantiation of claims that the perpetrator was motivated by hate and not asked to explain the fact that no charges of hate or terror had yet been leveled in the case. Mr. Katsuya continued that alt-right forces were being fed by a feeling of insecurity and that this flame of insecurity was being fanned by “trash” radio that had gone too far. His solution was to clamp down on the free speech rights of such entities.

It is safe to say that M-103 deliberations have dropped any sense of being benign and of no consequence to the free speech rights of Canadians. This right is now squarely on the table and being adjudicated by a Committee and a Chair who, as Mr. Fatah stated, scoff at those who oppose Sharia.

The audio link is here:

http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/XRender/en/PowerBrowser/PowerBrowserV2/20170920/-1/27874
commented 2017-09-24 03:41:08 -0400
Heritage Committee – September 18 Meeting

Heritage Committee deliberations on systemic racism and religious discrimination in Canada began in earnest today. A video recording of the proceedings can be found below. It is interesting to note that MP Khalid’s testimony attempted at every turn to concentrate on “all” forms of racism rather than just “Islamophobia” in the particular. Also interesting to note that many MPs remarked on the fact that their constituents have been on the blower to them demanding that free speech not be impinged and Sharia Law not be introduced in any form in Canada.

At the end of the meeting, the Conservative lead on M-103 deliberations, David Anderson, chastised the Chair, Hedy Fry, for giving the Liberal members five extra minutes over and above what the Conservatives received.

There seemed to be a definite one-sidedness to the proceedings. It is noted that, in the whole video, the only type of extremism mentioned is “right wing extremism” and “white supremacy”. No mention at all of Islam or Jihad. Seems as though “Islamophobia” is already being “quelled”.

The video link is here:

http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/XRender/en/PowerBrowser/PowerBrowserV2/20170918/-1/27847

(note: although the video begins playing at 15:48:18, you will need to forward 28 minutes to 16:16:00 which is when the meeting actually starts, and it concludes at 18:29:56)
commented 2017-09-24 03:39:57 -0400
Minutes of Proceedings
Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (CHPC)
42nd Parliament, 1st Session
Meeting No. 70
Tuesday, June 20, 2017, 4:01 p.m. to 5:41 p.m.

Systemic Racism and Religious Discrimination
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the Committee on Tuesday, April 4, 2017, the Committee commenced its study of systemic racism and religious discrimination.

It was agreed, — That 36 witness appearance places be allocated to the Liberal Party, 24 to the Conservative Party and 12 to the New Democratic Party; and that witnesses be placed in panels according to the allocation above and following the priority assigned by each party.

It was agreed, — That academic witnesses and human rights commissions be invited to make written submissions.

It was agreed, — That, unless a party choses to insert them among their priority of witnesses, requests to appear not be further considered, but that they be asked to make written submissions.
commented 2017-09-24 03:31:22 -0400
​Minutes of Proceedings
Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (CHPC)
42nd Parliament, 1st Session
Meeting No. 53
Tuesday, April 4, 2017, 4:14 p.m. to 5:25 p.m.
Room 315, Wellington Building, 197 Sparks Street
Presiding
Hon. Hedy Fry, Chair (Liberal)
After debate, the question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to, by a show of hands: YEAS: 9; NAYS: 0.
The motion, as amended, read as follows:
That, pursuant to Standing Order 108 (2) and in accordance with the resolution of the House agreed to on Thursday, March 23, 2017 which read:
That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear; (b) condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination and take note of House of Commons’ petition e-411 and the issues raised by it; and © request that the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage undertake a study on how the government could (i) develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia, in Canada, while ensuring a community-centered focus with a holistic response through evidence-based policy-making, (ii) collect data to contextualize hate crime reports and to conduct needs assessments for impacted communities, and that the Committee should present its findings and recommendations to the House no later than 240 calendar days from the adoption of this motion, provided that in its report, the Committee should make recommendations that the government may use to better reflect the enshrined rights and freedoms in the Constitution Acts, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. (Private Members’ Business M-103)
The Committee commence a study as requested in paragraph © of the motion referenced above; and that the Committee schedule witnesses to appear such that it would complete gathering necessary evidence and give instructions to the Committee analysts to draft a report with the objective of reporting back to the House its findings and recommendations.
On motion of Kevin Waugh, it was agreed, — That the Committee invite the Minister of Canadian Heritage to appear concerning the Main Estimates 2017-18, on Wednesday, May 10, 2017, from noon to 1 p.m.

The Media and Local Communities

Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the Committee on Tuesday, February 16, 2016, the Committee resumed its study of the media and local communities.

Motion

Kevin Waugh moved, — That further consideration of the report on the Media and Local Communites be postponed until the fall.

commented 2017-09-24 02:45:24 -0400
Heddy’s mind is fried like all liberals. They are global narcissists who don’t want others to live without them telling them how to do it. Notice the feminist PM is using women and minorities to take down our country for Islam.