December 12, 2018

UN bans The Rebel from reporting on Migration Conference

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

On last night's episode of The Ezra Levant Show, The Rebel's mission specialist David Menzies joined me to discuss the UN banning him from reporting inside their migration conference in Marrakech, Morrocco.

We applied to have David given media access to the conference, but our application was denied because UN elites weren't pleased with our opinions.

The same thing happened to Sheila Gunn Reid, who we sent to report on the UN climate change conference in Poland.

I'm not surprised that the UN would attempt to silence critical media, but it's disturbing that Justin Trudeau and his Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen did nothing to defend the rights of Canadian journalists.

Maybe it's because they know we won't be bought by their $595M media bailout.

WATCH my interview with David to see how the Liberals are betraying Canadian values, and to hear more about what he's encountered while reporting on the UN.

Visit RebelUN.com to watch all of David and Sheila Gunn Reid's UN reports.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-12-12 16:36:52 -0500
The Chinese may be our enemy; mideast jihadists returning may be our enemy but the worse, in my opinion, is the MEDIA AND FAKE NEWS…the ones that are `bought.`
commented 2018-12-12 14:20:04 -0500
In France it appears that there are 26,000 Islamic Extremists on the terror watch list. They say to watch one potential terrorist it takes 20 anti-terror police. If each policeman bears a total cost of approx $100,000 that is $52 billion to properly monitor the terror watch list in France.

If our ratio of extremists on our watch list in Canada is similar to France (based on Muslim population) then we have some 5000 on our list. With that in mind how many potential terrorists are really on our terror watch list and how much does it cost us to monitor them?
commented 2018-12-12 13:51:53 -0500
MAX CHARLES….. Excellent warning to your US re Chinese aggression through Canada. With you pointing out this new enemy, plus our Islamic enemies, the UN and our Own Federal Govt, Russia is beginning to look like our only friend.

Max, where you really messed up your point is the Border Jumpers between New York and Quebec are let in by an incredibly weak US border system. It is even worse when you consider that these possible terrorists FLY in from anywhere in the world (many war torn areas in Africa) to the US Airports, where even 3rd world Countries are supposed to have modern security.
You are correct in describing Trudeau as a mega-stooge Prime Minister; however this makes the US lucky because a normal PM would put 40-60,000 illegal Migrants on Buses and send them back to New York.

The US should consider changing its Governing system to allow your President to SECURE its Borders so that your neighbors don’t suffer because of this neglect.
commented 2018-12-12 13:05:00 -0500
The UN Global Compact on Migration doesn’t matter to Canada one bit whether we sign it or not, or if we send petitions as TRUDEAU IMPLEMENTED IT OVER 2 YEARS AGO. Some months we receive 2500, last month we received 1400, We only sent back 230 out of 38,000.
The irregular border jumpers are now receiving work permits while the first wave of Syrian Refugees are receiving CITIZENSHIP Papers, so they can vote in the upcoming election.
That lying Hussen said that the Syrians are well settled, last survey showed they were over 85 % unemployed. Canadians are SUCKERS.

This is a few months old, however things haven’t changed much.
https://globalnews.ca/news/4191302/asylum-border-crossers-removals-ending-up/
commented 2018-12-12 13:01:35 -0500
Well, I tried to discuss this on CBC’s comment page and was banned with the excuse I am promoting hate speech. It appears the CBC is already following the Sharia Law passages in the new Compact.
commented 2018-12-12 11:56:33 -0500
How much of this Migration agreement is driven by China which covets the natural resources of Canada and America and has a keen interest in making both nations lose control of their borders? Please see the following statement which illustrates this point and share the information with as many people as possible.

It’s time for Americans to take a hard look at the hostile Chinese-influenced state that is emerging on their northern border, replacing a peaceful neighbor. The Chinese government has all the money it needs to buy influence in the U.S. as well and it clearly does so, but you have to look north to Canada to see the process occurring in overdrive. The strengthening of Chinese influence in Canada has only accelerated since their mega-stooge Justin Trudeau became Prime Minister in 2015.

China has every interest in destabilizing N. America in order to grab its resources and if it can get Canada and/or the U.S. to lose control of its borders, it will certainly do so. Since Trudeau came to office, enforcement of immigration law has become a joke at best with failed refugee claimants from Haiti and the Middle East crossing the border from the U.S. at will and being turned loose right away as long as they promise to attend a hearing in a few months time. Having a chaotic state full of people who identify mainly with other countries suits China’s interests in every way but the Chinese government also needs to get as many of its own people as possible onto Canadian soil. Even though Canada has not needed an new immigration for at least 30 years, the Chinese government can and does pay the right people to keep the immigration pipeline open. Why wouldn’t they pay politicians to promote unnecessary immigration? Why wouldn’t they pay journalists to demonize any politician who dares to oppose unnecessary immigration? Why wouldn’t they pay union leaders to look the other way as the labour market gets flooded? Why wouldn’t they do all of this in the U.S and buy influence in the universities while they’re at it?

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) constantly warns of politicians accepting favours from the Chinese government. Are we supposed to think that these politicians would not do China’s bidding on immigration matters? Are we supposed to think that the same thing does not happen in the U.S.?