February 25, 2017

UN Climate Results are Only Possible Through Corruption

Tim BallRebel Columnist

Trump does not need a reason to pull the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement, but if he did, a recent exposure of corruption at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would suffice. 

It is just the most recent example of the deliberate corruption of science to meet a political agenda that is the entire history of the global warming deception.

The scientific method involves creating a hypothesis based on a set of assumptions. Other scientists, acting in their role as skeptics, immediately try to disprove the hypothesis, almost always by showing that one of the assumptions is wrong. In the case of the human (anthropogenic) caused global warming (AGW) hypothesis this did not happen. The people responsible for its creation, members of the group that formed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) determined to prove the hypothesis. As Douglas Yates said,

“No scientific theory achieves public acceptance until it has been thoroughly discredited.”

It was inevitable that despite attempts to limit and direct research through funding, or only publishing articles that seemed to support the hypothesis, the facts would emerge. Aldous Huxley explained,

“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.”

These facts put the hypothesis in jeopardy, and a proper scientific reaction requires a re-examination of the science.

Promoters of the UN IPCC global warming were not acting like scientists. The chose to ignore, alter, misrepresent, anything that didn’t support their claim that human CO2 was causing global warming. The most extreme example was when they completely rewrote climate history by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period (MWP). It had to go because it contradicted their claim that current temperatures were higher than ever before.

The most recent example was revealed in June 2015. The IPCC predicted that as CO2 increased the global temperature would continue to rise. It stopped happening after 1998 as Figure 1 shows.

Figure 1

I added the red lines and the labels because they illustrate the change in trend. I also added the labels Global Warming and Climate Change. The problem they had was that global temperature stopped rising, but CO2 continued to increase. In other words, their prediction was wrong, and proper science would reexamine the science. Instead, they changed the name. We have that on record because 2004 leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) said,

“In my experience, global warming freezing is already a bit of a public relations problem with the media.”

Swedish Chief Climate Negotiator Bo Kjellen replied, 

“I agree with Nick that climate change might be a better labelling than global warming.”

The period of no temperature increase became an increasing problem to their story. Initially, Benjamin Santer said it was not significant and would only become so after 17 years. This was the same Santer involved in one of the earliest alterations of data known as the Chapter 8 debacle. He took wording agreed to by the committee and altered it on his own in the final Report. For example, the original wording was

“While some of the pattern-base discussed here have claimed detection of a significant climate change, no study to date has positively attributed all or part of climate change observed to man-made causes.”

Santer’s version:

“The body of statistical evidence in chapter 8, when examined in the context of our physical understanding of the climate system, now points to a discernible human influence on the global climate.”

The top portion of Figure 2 shows the section of the graph Santer chose to make his claim. The lower portion shows the larger graph with no trend. It is standard corrupted climate science known as “cherry-picking.”

Figure 2

The prolonged period with no temperature increase, now known as “the hiatus” or the “pause,” exceeded Santer’s 17-year requirement. It caught the attention of the cartoonists.

A report claimed that Dr. John Bates, a recently retired NOAA scientist, was witness to an incorrectly produced paper. The article headline read, “Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data.” Bates was a hero to some and incorrectly called a whistleblower. He knew about the corruption in 2015 and waited until he retired to “go public.” The paper he referred to was one by Karl and Peterson, NOAA employees, deliberately created using known bad data and inappropriate methods. It was rushed through because President Obama was determined to ratify the Paris Climate Agreement in December 2015 as a major part of his Presidential legacy.

Bates claimed he told his bosses about the problem then, but they ignored him. The problem is everything was already in the public record at the time. I listened to Congressman Lamar Smith tell the general audience at the June 2015 Heartland Conference that subpoenas were filed requesting full disclosure of all the material. He also told us the requests were rejected, but a follow-up was in progress. The same information was reported in the mainstream media, albeit with a bias.

Maurice Strong told Elaine Dewar that he was implementing his global warming agenda through the UN because

He could raise his own money from whomever he liked, appoint anyone he wanted, control the agenda.

As Dewar concluded:

Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.

This latest example of corrupted science by bureaucrats is evidence enough of why Trump must withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and the UN Climate program. He should also reduce NOAA to data collection. Indeed, all national weather agencies that were used by Strong to create and promulgate the biggest deception in history, including Environment Canada, should be reduced to data collection agencies. Their science is corrupt, and their forecasts were always wrong. Besides, bureaucrats must do what they are told; scientists must always question.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-03-02 19:23:18 -0500
Global Warming or what is now called Climate Change, is a complete hoax. What Climate Change is all about is three things, Money, Power and Control. They have secured their strong position in the world using the very same tactics as Islam. Along with their lies, they fabricate data that supports their directive, get laws changed by having brain dead politicians support their position and engage in violent protests. And what appears to be legitimate climate related conventions designed to in some way take money from the tax paying west and issue controls over those societies that are in fact paying for the whole process. And our Prime Minister Justin “Moneybags” Trudeau is out in front trying to lead the pack.
commented 2017-02-28 08:57:31 -0500
We are experiencing our second mild winter in as many years. A rather small sampling to declare that GW and CC is firmly in place, however, if one views any of the human interest stories in the news casts with on street interviews of pedestrians, ALL of those interviewed love the mild temps. Already they’ve had a snoot-full of winter and are embracing the warm temps and all that comes with them. A short list includes ; people jogging, bicycling, walking and fewer people falling on ice, dying of heart problems while shoveling snow, fewer traffic accident/fatalities due to bad roads, less time wasted cleaning cars of snow and less/shorter warmups of cars thereby adding less effluents to the atmosphere-ditto for house warming. The list goes on and on. Perhaps the green weenies could tell us just what they expect the most optimal winter temperatures to be and for how long. For now, though, bask in the glory of the present mild winter, because next year may be a whole new ball game.
commented 2017-02-27 12:41:11 -0500
Hi Paul I’ve also wondered about what they gain by creating a Muslim problem in the west. Perhaps they want a civil war situation where rights will be suspended and total control exercised.
commented 2017-02-27 09:06:06 -0500
The two biggest lies facing the western world today are: AGW/ACC and Islam is a religion of peace. After much research I have come to a conclusion: AGW/ACC is a ruse to distract us while Islam conquers the Western World. I’ve followed the money but can’t figure out how the world reverting back to the 7th century could benefit anyone.
commented 2017-02-26 13:57:52 -0500
Bet most IPCC wanted to show only ‘64-’87 part of whole graph in their hole graph in fig#2. What’s another year. Just say “if it saves 1 life”. Because social license?
commented 2017-02-26 13:49:23 -0500
Trudeau will never admit, what he knows to well, Man Made Global Warming is a man made scam. What percentage of the revenue gathered from the GW scam, goes into Trudeau’s off shore Bank Acc’t, from where it is fed to His Islamic Gods.

J Trudeau could do the Country a great favor by resigning. He should do this NOW, before Canada is completely ruined.

But then, just maybe, this is His goal.

Scum begets Scum.
commented 2017-02-26 09:29:32 -0500
Ya gotta love the smug econazi driving it’s hybrid or electric car dumping on you if you drive a V-8 truck or car. "Hey, Mr PINHEAD!; the rare earths and metals in your JESUS-CHRYSLER SUV (Show Ur Virtue) are strip-mined in china with Fecking ZERO environmental oversight.
Oy! Feck off!
commented 2017-02-26 09:15:08 -0500
As others in our crew have pointed out, the SUN is the driver of climate on the earth. Man’s influence is but a minor irritant to climate, akin to a mosquito on an elephant’s ass.

Problem is we have to still fight hard, the other side is so entrenched in the lies and their mantra. Their delusion is so severe they could be likened to a hardened drug addict. Might say they see the light, but I expect the battle is certainly not over.

Hopefully TRUMP will not waver, will pull some of the US funding from the UN, and denounce the Paris climate agreement. Make Hillary eat her words on the vilification of the coal industry, get Keystone on the go and send a message to the world that the climate whoring is over. With the help of GOD, we may be able to stave off the stupidity of Canada’s corrupt climate clowns before its too late.

Example of governMENTAL stupidity. Last week during question period the liberals were queried about their carbon tax push, and to reveal what the true cost to Canadians would be. Up popped the blonde bimbo herself, scientist extraordinaire, Catherine McKenna. Spoken like a true lieberal know nothing, the response was " we are responsible and getting out ahead of CO2 pollution. CO2 pollution? If MS. Bimbosity keeps flaunting the lies, someone should CLUE her in. As for the actual question…..nada,no answer, crickets……the usual. In fact after a whole week of question period I don’t think I heard ONE actual answer from any of the liberal scum.

Calling JAMES RITCHIE,Calling JAMES RICHIE…..notice how I requested someone’s help in this matter? I wasn’t crooning to an " imaginary man" in the clouds as you would have us think James, just a plea to an entity who some of us believe exists and just might help in a time of need. You can contact your “man in the clouds”, Neil Tyson Degrasse, and get YOUR truth. What you should do is apologize to the 40% of Albertans you insulted on Friday. They are right, you are wrong. Keep believing those IPCC numbers, and by all means keep paying that carbon tax….the one that WON’T save the planet, just make you poor.
commented 2017-02-26 06:29:24 -0500
Failed verification = Failed model. This has become Political Science AKA Junk.
commented 2017-02-26 04:23:05 -0500
As I’ve posted before, and many times… Trying to dismiss the global affect of the sun’s varying radiation, hour by hour, year by year, century by century, millennium by millennium, on every damn square foot of this blessed earth’s surface, is as stupid as accepting that Al Gore. George Soros, or Leonard Di Caprio, or Dr. Fruit Fly, or Hanoi Hanna, or the Boy Blunder in Ottawa, know what the BLEEP they are talking about…
commented 2017-02-25 22:22:59 -0500
Only two things affect climate change…
1 is how the world rotates on its axis.
2 it depends what kind of mood the sun is in.
Beyond that it’s formally known as the weather.!!
commented 2017-02-25 21:34:53 -0500
Dale Warren good point , they claim to care about life on earth , but they actually only care about power and wealth for themselves.
Dave T i remember the other huge crisis that never happened as well, they love to spew their garbage.
commented 2017-02-25 20:52:16 -0500
When you exclude the sun from climate change it is like saying the fire is hot with out a flame.Just a hoax to make poor countries rich and rich countries poor.And Canadians being the BIGGEST SUCKERS.
Jim you have to educate the voters good luck when some voted for nice hair.
commented 2017-02-25 20:47:06 -0500
The most frustrating aspect of this is the MSM’s ability to look away and avoid these stories when it suits them and most of the public is none the wiser.
commented 2017-02-25 17:10:44 -0500
If someone was to make charts and graphs on where and how much money is being scammed, then this corruption would come to and end quickly. The junk science is one thing, trying to track the money flow, now that is a whole other thesis.
commented 2017-02-25 16:51:26 -0500
John Landry . . . my dad worked with Maurice at Market Securities in Winnipeg in the late 40s . . . said he talked incessantly about how he was going to be rich and powerful. My dad and many others thought he was a complete nut job. Maurice of course proved them correct.
Maurice and Hanne Strong’s Baca Delusions – The New Unhappy Lords – World Economic Forum at Davos
http://www.abeldanger.net/2012/07/maurice-and-hanne-strongs-baca.html
commented 2017-02-25 16:27:59 -0500
With the pending doom that will absolutely be upon our children with the Islamification of the world WTF are we doing worrying about climate change?
commented 2017-02-25 16:12:16 -0500
What, pray tell, is the optimal temperature of the globe? Shouldn’t those who claim the world is too hot at least tell us what the temperature should be? They’ve set a goal to reduce the world temperature by 2 degrees Celsius by 2080 at the idiot Paris Climate Conference. Over 90 % of the people reading this now will be dead by 2080 (63 years for you Liberals) . The lefties started their great deficits back with Pierre Trudeau to create the just society( social engineering). He failed. Back then he was just taxing our future earnings. But after too many left wing governments we are now creating deficits that won’t be paid by our grand kids, let alone our own children. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Our idiot PM is firmly in bed with the green weenies so he can make government bigger and as we all know bigger government means higher taxes, higher taxes means reduced growth, less business and innovation, fewer jobs and less tax revenues. Vote them out where ever you find them!!!!
commented 2017-02-25 15:48:25 -0500
Nobody actually reads scientific papers unless they are paid to do so. That is perfectly understandable because they are pretty dry dull reading. Magazines that have the word “science” in their cover title are not written by scientists, they are written by journalists. Journalists who spin whoppers.
commented 2017-02-25 15:44:33 -0500
While we are on the subject of Climate Change, corrupt Governments, Bad Science, etc. etc. all spurred on by the MSM and you want a good read. See Michael Crichton’s book State of Fear. It sure fits the times. The greatest hoax ever.
commented 2017-02-25 15:33:10 -0500
Lennard Maillet said:

“Why can’t these arsehole “scientists” just tell the F%$King TRUTH?”

Because their government grants would dry up. These guy aren’t scientists, they are the modern version of Lysenko, or “National Socialist Physics”. All they care about is power and influence, and of course, their cushy, tenured lifestyles.
commented 2017-02-25 15:07:09 -0500
I was a preteen in the 70’s when the “Coming Ice Age” was being pushed by my commie teachers. Why can’t these arsehole “scientists” just tell the F%$King TRUTH? How bad is it REALLY? REALLY? No hyperbole, no nightmare scenarios, just the facts ma’am! Should we explore renewables? Sure! Should we find ways to curb ACTUAL pollutants? Absolutely! Should we transform our country into a pastoral luddite eden while china and india fill the atmosphere with tons of pollution? F*&k NO!
You have a DUTY! TELL THE GODDAMN TRUTH!
commented 2017-02-25 14:06:33 -0500
Where did that 1970s ice age go to anyways?
commented 2017-02-25 13:48:58 -0500
Further to Dr. Ball’s charts and cherry picking. In 2012 I wrote “Seeing Can Be Misleading” where I show how charts can be abused. It is about charts used for investments, but the concept holds true here as well, in fact the article was partly inspired by what was happening on the climate issue:
http://heinzegroup.com/insight.htm#4
commented 2017-02-25 13:30:16 -0500
Dale, you got it right.
One of my recommendations in “From There to Here” was:
We should be providing the poorest people of the world with cheap reliable electricity. This would probably be best done using small local coal power plants, with scrubbers where necessary to reduce real pollution. This would be the first step to providing them with the ability to cope with natural catastrophic events, safe water and sewer, good health care and finally to pull them out of poverty and towards becoming part of the middle class at which point their population would also start to naturally stabilize as it has in other developed places.
http://heinzegroup.com/climate2016.htm#3
commented 2017-02-25 13:11:57 -0500
The perversion of science by “environmentalists” for political ends has been around a long time.

- In the 60’s, it was “Silent Spring” and DDT. Now millions die of malaria that could easily be prevented.
- In the 70’s, it was “Prepare for an Ice Age; we are all going to freeze to death”.
- In the 80’s, it was “acid rain”.
- Since the 90’s, it’s been “global warming/climate change”.

Every decade or so, a new “crisis” has to be manufactured to keep the sheep in fear and willing to accept less and less personal freedom, and more and more government micromanagement of our lives. Since the environmentalist agenda is finally being outed as a scam, our “scientists” are now moving on to new social engineering agendas and new “crises”, for example…

- Now it is “scientifically proven” that the gender deluded need surgery, not psych meds.
- “Science” proves everyone is a snowflake who has allergies/Asperger’s/ADD/Autism and needs to be dosed with drugs.
- “Scientists” say our current standard of living is “unsustainable” and it is good for us to live stacked like battery hens in “diverse” mega-cities.
- “Scientists” have discovered that all of Western Civ’s advancements were created by oppressed minorities who apparently had the credit for their inventions stolen by the white man.

According to these “scientists”, the rest of us exist on sufferance only to “accommodate” all this lunacy, fund their politically-biased “research”, and pay our ever-increasing taxes to fund an ever-lower standard of living…
commented 2017-02-25 12:26:20 -0500
Its great that we on this site know what is happening, what about the rest of the world? Trudeau Wynne and Notley are the ones that count, as they are the people stealing our money. Then we should have Trials for Treason and if found guilty punishment for the rest of their lives.
commented 2017-02-25 11:52:10 -0500
Dale, you are 100% right. We should charge and hang these traitors for their outright lies. They are responsible for many deaths that could have been prevented by using this money to actually help people. Leftists are too stupid to understand.
commented 2017-02-25 11:44:45 -0500
My father worked under Maurice Strong when he headed Ontario Hydro in the 80’s. My father said, “Maurice Strong is the most dangerous man in the world”. My dad was a genius, but now I know why.