December 13, 2016

WATCH: Paul Joseph Watson on the truth about Russia 'hacking the election'

StaffRebel Columnist

In his latest video, Paul Joseph Watson takes on the claims that Russia helped Trump defeat Hillary Clinton and win the election.

His video description just about sums things up perfectly: “The left is willing to risk civil war in America & nuclear war with Russia because they're butt-hurt about losing. Let that sink in.”

Watson yet again utilizes his bombastic style and makes his point loud and clear. Check this out.

SOUND OFF in the comments with your thoughts.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-12-14 11:57:14 -0500
The insane left is working overtime on both sides of the 49th Parallel to prove to one and all . . .
that they really are Insane!
commented 2016-12-14 01:31:10 -0500
Edward Jobin great point, wikileaks has been doing this for quite a while now, suddenly it is horrible to the left.
commented 2016-12-13 18:08:10 -0500
U.S. is really messed up. The way the left keeps pushing against everybody else is only dividing the country and they are probably only about 30% of the population but maybe more with the way MSM has totally brainwashed the public. This sounds like Canada too. MSM favouritism of the liberals/communists must be abolished and outlawed.
commented 2016-12-13 16:06:45 -0500
Wikileaks has been providing leaks about many governments and people for years and the media commented on the information they used often to the embarrassment of those affected which is what made it so hypocritical when the government and media outlets started feigning outrage over Trump using stolen emails. Funny I don’t remember that kind of outrage when the New York Times published Donald Trump’s tax returns which they never revealed which government obtained and turned over to them, and was the fodder of Hillary Clinton’s criticisms over Trump’s not paying taxes to because of his businesses losses. Yet Hillary had no problem using that material and we still don’t know who did the hacking. So the democrats don’t mind using stolen material when it is convenient to their purposes and it’s not like the U.S. hasn’t hacked other countries or tried to influence their governments but it seems the U.S. prefers to take the high road call for insurrections as the failed Arab spring has demonstrated.
commented 2016-12-13 14:11:32 -0500
It only proves how hysterical people can become without wanting to know the whole story. Yet, Hillary is out there talking about fake news?
I hope Trump reconsiders investigating and prosecuting her.
commented 2016-12-13 13:40:43 -0500
It is really a wicked web being weaved here. We have Hillary and the Democratic camp working with the CIA to try to steal the election. The CIA introduced no new evidence, but simply re-wrote their assessment to suggest that Russia hacked into the DNC and that helped Donald win the election. It is pure poppycock of course. Assange has indicated that it was an insider leak, not the Russians. If the information did come from a Russian hack, then the DNC needs to show us the proof that it came from a hack.

Then we have the neo-conservative RINOS like Graham and McCain. They are so bent on removing Assad from power, they will say anything to make the Russians appear in the worst light possible, even throw Trump under the bus, whom they hate anyways.

What is really hilarious is that the Russians have always been the “good guys” in Democratic circles. All through the Cold War, but then, voila, October 2016 rolls around, and now the Russians are the “bad guys”.

Go Tucker for tossing that asshat from your show. This is an attempted coup.

And again, who are the sore losers?
commented 2016-12-13 13:06:26 -0500
The whole Politic of the Left is built on Lies.
commented 2016-12-13 13:02:40 -0500
Bombastic comes from the root word, bomb. I.e. “bomb-like”. He goes of like a bomb. Has nothing to do with the presence or lack of meaning.
commented 2016-12-13 12:54:59 -0500
I don’t understand THEREBEL’s use of the word “bombastic” in your statement: “Watson yet again utilizes his bombastic style and makes his point loud and clear.”
" bom·bas·tic
high-sounding but with little meaning; inflated.
“bombastic rhetoric”
synonyms: pompous, blustering, turgid, verbose, orotund, high-flown, high-sounding, overwrought, pretentious, ostentatious, grandiloquent;"

I think PJW rants pack in an awful lot of meaning…
commented 2016-12-13 11:58:13 -0500
This video has a lot of hits already – -and truth is the real victim here (as is most Obama messaging)

Let’s explore the irrationality of this lie by pretending it was true – why does it matter who hacked the emails which revealed the truth about Clinton which she was hiding? Is there any value in arguing about who exposed a criminal and a liar?

Clinton lost because she was an inappropriate candidate for the office – her entire campaign consisted of the extension of her scandal-plagued career , which was lying and covering up her crimes and incompetence – the scandalous baggage she dragged around was so huge it was going to be exposed sooner or later.

On the more realistic side of this issue, the hacks came from multiple sources, the largest part being domestically and from government insiders – more like leaked than hacked
commented 2016-12-13 11:49:02 -0500
The regressives of the left are so transparent in providing #Falsenews that it shows how arrogant they are in their belief that only they should govern. They do not care that if they overturn an election won legally, it will lead to civil violence.

They do this continually, world over. The Canadian example being the Council of Canadians trying to overturn the 2011election on a false narrative. Or currently trying to portray Jean, Kennedy and Fildebrandt as extremists in Alberta.