February 07, 2018

What happens when young women reject Trudeau’s brand of feminism? (Guest: Dierdre Sprenger, UAlberta Pro-Life)

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Host | The Gunn Show


Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government is avowedly feminist. He literally can’t shut up about it. And with preening third wave feminism comes abortion activism.

This year, Trudeau suddenly announced that to access Canada summer jobs funding, churches, faith groups and religious charities count on for summer programming, they would now have to tow the Liberal party’s official line on support for abortion.

The Liberals even had the audacity to write the bizarre pledge into the grant application.

The new attestation reads:

“...that both the job and the organization’s ‘core mandate’ respect reproductive rights,“ including “the right to access safe and legal abortions.”

This is a direct assault on the conscience rights of pro-life people. Instead of swearing allegiance to their God and country, they now have to swear an attestation of allegiance to Justin Trudeau’s weird brand of gynocentric liberalism.

But what happens when young women reject Trudeau’s brand of feminism rooted in abortion as both healthcare and female empowerment?

Tonight I talk to one of these young women. She staged a protest at one of his town halls to remind Trudeau that conscience rights are in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms but abortion rights are not.

The mainstream media ignored her.

Joining me tonight is Dierdre Sprenger, the president of UAlberta Pro-Life to talk about the Liberal’s attack on freedom of religion, and what it’s like to be a pro-life student on campus.

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2018-02-13 13:24:38 -0500
Andrew Stephenson,

Great response as always.
commented 2018-02-13 10:51:52 -0500
“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 2018-02-11 14:39:52 -0500
Well Andrew, it’s a pretty a strange statement to compare your repetitive/obsessive posts on Rebel Media to someone making societal progress….bloated ego and a lack of personal insight explains much about your reasoning for claiming such a thing. "

Does it occur to you that I put effort into things beyond the internet? The amount of time I spend on here is pretty minimal, my “obsessive nature” means I can pound out one of these posts in about three minutes, probably no longer than it takes you to put out your puddles of vague character assassination.

“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 2018-02-11 22:58:12 -0500
Just ask Andrew!”
Not touching this one….

“The list can go for pages and pages. "

And most of it’s vague paranoia absolutely dripping with perception biases, what happens when you start with the conclusion and then try to find reasons why, after the fact. A lot of it’s pretty nebulous… The ‘Hijab Hoax" was horseplay that got out of hand, Khadr was going to be paid a settlement of that size no matter what, projecting the deficit 40 years out is ridiculous, and for every Soros meddling on the Left, there’s a Koch on the Right doing the exact same thing.

“Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt commented 2018-02-12 15:13:33 -0500
Trolls of all stripes have their own agenda. Andrew included.

Since you brought up the 21st century, why are you mute on 7th century barbarism that is alive and well in Canada?!! Boy, they do insist we are to be tolerant of their intolerance. Funny you are brave enough to bash Christianity, however, Islam gets a free pass. Hmmmmm! "

Fundamentalism of all flavours belongs in the past. This is a strawman – most Muslims are not 7th century barbarians. Yes, there are a few terrorists out there, but generic “Muslim” is a test for them that somehow manages to suck at both sensitivity AND specificity.

And, yeah, fundamentalist Christians are a bigger problem, since they outnumber fundamentalist Muslims by at least an order of magnitude, and aren’t terribly different in ultimate motive. Sure, some Muslims view women as lesser, but look at this very article, which indirectly advocates using legislation to take away women’s reproductive rights, and the Rebel and its readers base broader opposition to feminism or anything other than “traditional” values, which is to say, heterosexual marriage and childbearing as the ultimate goal rather than supporting individual choice and freedoms – the actual bastion of a liberal, free society. I consider either scenario equally distasteful.
commented 2018-02-12 15:39:15 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

So what’s Andrew’s agenda.

I don’t care about Islam – Islam doesn’t impact my life. Christians do. Again, I don’t have the same view as you do that Canada is doomed due to Muslims.

You also care about Trudeau more than I do and think that I love him or something. You need to understand that not commenting on something can also be applied to things you don’t give a shit about. There are things I like about Justin and there are things I don’t like about Justin. I don’t really give him much thought – my concern is how my life and the life of my family is going and I have no reason to complain yet under Trudeau.

You may live in Ontario, but your have an Albertan mentality. Or more appropriately – a Texan.
commented 2018-02-12 15:13:33 -0500
Trolls of all stripes have their own agenda. Andrew included.

Since you brought up the 21st century, why are you mute on 7th century barbarism that is alive and well in Canada?!! Boy, they do insist we are to be tolerant of their intolerance. Funny you are brave enough to bash Christianity, however, Islam gets a free pass. Hmmmmm!

Funny, you think everyone who doesn’t sit in your camp lives in Alberta….your attention span is that of a squirrel. I’m in Ontario!

The point of bringing up the topics you flee from is there is a consistent pattern….the truth about your dear leader is taboo for you. I understand it’s a painful subject for chronically deluded followers of Trudeau/Butts. You really have a problem with people who resist Marxism and stand up for freedom in Canada.

So, go back to living like a mushroom…they thrive surrounded by manure, and, in your case, it’s the Liberal Party of Canada which is shoveling the shit. Just ask Andrew is she considers you a friend.

Bye Bye James.
commented 2018-02-12 14:06:23 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

So your definition of a troll is someone who doesn’t comment on things YOU think are vitally important or earth shattering to Canadians, since we have already established that Andrew is kind and respectful with her opposing views, but yet you still deem her a troll.


To be fair, you and others here make it very hard not to mock with your outrage over things that you shouldn’t be outraged over if you are living in the 21st century and modern society. I do understand though, Alberta is still in the 20th century and hasn’t caught up with rest of Canada yet.
commented 2018-02-12 01:27:23 -0500
Oh, I forgot that you also support bashing Christians!
commented 2018-02-12 01:25:12 -0500
Yes, got it James… you support 8 year Drag Kids; Gay Pride Parades; Trump Derangement Syndrome; killing babies….
That’s more than enough bullshit to contend with!
commented 2018-02-12 00:44:01 -0500
so I am NOT going to waste my time on bullshit like you do.
commented 2018-02-12 00:42:29 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Nice dodge there.

I won’t speak for Andrew, but I suspect that we both make posts on issues or subjects that interest us or that we want to talk about. We are not required give our view every time someone at the Rebel posts a video. That’s how forums work.

I also did comment on a few of those issues like Khadr and The Hijab Hoax for example. You also have to keep in mind that much of what The Rebel posts is fear mongering, hyperbole, conspiracy theories and just full blown lies, so I am going to waste my time on bullshit like you do, but from time to time I will, like this today:


In addition, I also don’t care about some of the things that apparently keep you up at night, so that’s another reason why I don’t comment on things you think are important and dooming Canada. I just laugh that shit off.
commented 2018-02-12 00:21:59 -0500
Just ask Andrew!
commented 2018-02-12 00:19:10 -0500
No comments by either of you on articles/reports re: Trudeau making the convicted terrorist Khadr a multi-millionaire; Libs welcoming ISIS terrorists back to Canada; findings of the Ethics Commissioner – Trudeau guilty – 4 counts; Morneau scandals and corruption; Islamization of Canada – multiple examples; illegal immigration, Trudeau giving billions to foreign nations; Budget will not be balanced until 2054; Trudeau gave Clinton Foundations multi-millions after the FBI launched an investigation into the CF; Trudeau outsourcing development of immigration policies to Soros and the UN; selling companies to China against the advice of CSIS; M-103; Sexual Harassment scandals within the LPC (6 at the moment); Principal Secretary calling anyone who reported on Trudeau’s Peoplekind gaffe a Nazi (worldwide coverage, so everyone is a Nazi according to Butts); Trudeau telling our veterans they are asking for more than the government can give – meanwhile spends billions on his worldwide pet projects or 8.1 million dollar skating rink on the Hill; Trudeau comparing ISIS jihadists returning to Italians, Portuguese, Vietnamese etc… fleeing persecution.; Corporate Welfare payments to Bombardier; Cabinet Ministers who are not qualified to handle the duties; and there is Maryam Monsef still in Parliament; Minister of Stolen Valour wasn’t fired; PM aided and abetted Hijab Hoax along with msm & didn’t apologize……

The list can go for pages and pages.
commented 2018-02-11 23:24:57 -0500
Stay thirsty my friends!

The Most Interesting Man In The World.
commented 2018-02-11 23:23:48 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,


That wasn’t meant literally. I chit chat with my mailman from time to time and will say good to see you my friend. I don’t think we are actually friends in the traditional sense. It’s just a sort of figure of speech.

I don’t think Andrew and I are friends in that same traditional sense, but we are obviously on the opposing side if you deem us to be trolls, so we have that in common in addition to thinking the same way on many issues.

Jan called me a pedophile. Why don’t you call her rude? You know how you can tell when someone is a batshit crazy extreme conservative? When they call people they don’t even know pedophiles with such ease and with no thought at all over how abhorrent such a false accusation is without 100% proof.

So I trust you can understand why I don’t give a shit about Jan’s feelings.

What makes Andrew a troll then if I am evil incarnate and she is kind and respectful with her opposing views?
commented 2018-02-11 22:58:12 -0500
Just ask Andrew!
commented 2018-02-11 22:55:20 -0500
Anyway James, wasn’t it you who posted “Your posts on here are great and I love that you constantly hand everyone their ass.
Keep it up my friend.”

Your posts to Jan were over the top, and extremely rude. It was an attack full of profanity and abuse.
It’s disturbing you get so much enjoyment out of it.

As I told you before, Andrew trolls this site and you & she are in a different league. I mentioned she uses the same pseudonym, doesn’t abuse other people and has more brains than you do.

Anyway James, why don’t you ask Andrew if she is your friend.
commented 2018-02-11 22:35:05 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

It doesn’t assume anything. Does it sound reasonable to that she would come to my defense here and there in debates if she thought of me as you do?

You and others have called both Andrew and I trolls – clearly you have created the alliance for us.

I am not speaking for Jan’s ex-husband – I am mocking what she said about him – that he was laughing at her. I am sure I am not far off based on the insane posts she makes on here. I am sure any man would want to get the fuck out of there.

I told you look up Erin Berry – you can see her arguing with Liza. Liza knows that Erin thinks she is an awful person and it also pissed Liza off that Erin (a conservative) liked me.
commented 2018-02-11 22:31:31 -0500
I don’t know how you arrived at me speaking for Andrew when I posted my opinion, notice my word choices. Unlike you, I used “I think”
See how your statements are written like you are an authority on someone else’s thoughts, in this case, Andrew?

“Don’t count on Andrew overlooking your long history of abusive posts under a variety of pseudonyms.
I could be wrong, but, your aggressive and volatile personality on this site is something I don’t think Andrew is impressed with.”
commented 2018-02-11 22:15:15 -0500
Sure, if you say so….
“she doesn’t think I am dangerous…..” “I am quite sure Andrew….”
Logically speaking James, you decided to speak for Andrew. Look at your word choices

Andrew posts her opinion…. and now you have determined this is some kind of alliance and friendship; this is assuming a lot.

On other threads you decided to speak for Jan’s ex-husband when you launched an attack on her. You did the same thing to Liza Rosie at different times…speaking for a woman named Erin Berry.

So, again James, how about you take your own advice!
commented 2018-02-11 21:35:56 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

That’s not speaking for her – I am speaking about our interactions and how we have helped each other on various debates on here. Certainly not the actions of someone who thinks I am dangerous if you can think logically about it.
commented 2018-02-11 20:32:48 -0500
Seems you have a selective memory.
“I am quite sure Andrew sees through your bullshit, so no – she doesn’t think I am dangerous and doesn’t need your warnings. Besides, we are likeminded on most issues, so why I would be a threat to her? Your idea of logic is absolute idiocy.”

So, how about you take your own advice for change?
commented 2018-02-11 20:15:37 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

I am not speaking for anyone else. This is your thing.
commented 2018-02-11 19:10:43 -0500
How about you do the same!
commented 2018-02-11 19:00:56 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

So speak for yourself – not for Andrew or anyone else.
commented 2018-02-11 18:40:17 -0500
So what!
commented 2018-02-11 18:29:30 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Andrew and I get along and have interacted on many debates on here – in addition to her adding further points to an argument that I have made to another poster.

Speak for yourself and just add to huge pile of you being wrong. I am perfectly reasonable to anyone who isn’t an extreme conservative.

You should look up Erin Berry on here and see a reasonable conservative – I got along great with her even though we didn’t often agree. She was reasonable and rational, but couldn’t take the batshit crazy extreme conservatives on here any longer or the The Rebel’s highly questionable content, so she left. We would talk via email after that.
commented 2018-02-11 17:57:22 -0500
Listen James, I consider you to be a disordered person, in addition to being vile. So, hang up your grandiose fantasy, people with NPD do cause harm in many different ways, and, I owe you nothing.

There is no question in my mind you are deeply disturbed.

Don’t count on Andrew overlooking your long history of abusive posts under a variety of pseudonyms.
I could be wrong, but, your aggressive and volatile personality on this site is something I don’t think Andrew is impressed with.
commented 2018-02-11 17:07:56 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

I was willing to do make any proposal or suggestion per what is done every single day by normal people to get you to come out of your safe space and have a real debate/discussion outside of the extreme limitations of The Rebel.

You have declined because you don’t want to leave your safe space at all for anyone. You can’t debate one on one – you need your Rebel pals backing you up. Everything else is just an excuse for that, including trying to make me out to be dangerous when that couldn’t be further from the truth.

There are people debating on YouTube constantly who have far more hatred for each other than you and I have, but the difference is – they don’t make excuses like you do or make ridiculous suggestions that harm may come to you if I have access to an email address for fuck sake per how Skype is set up.

That is moronic and you know it. You are so easy to figure out. You make such claims, because you know your Rebel pals will rally around you and give you support when you make your excuses. It’s honestly pathetic.

I am quite sure Andrew sees through your bullshit, so no – she doesn’t think I am dangerous and doesn’t need your warnings. Besides, we are likeminded on most issues, so why I would be a threat to her? Your idea of logic is absolute idiocy.
commented 2018-02-11 16:25:03 -0500
Circling back to your fantasy again, which you have built up in your mind….
First, you demanded I name a location, date and time to meet you for a “debate”, with a non-partisan moderator. Nothing crazy about that!!!!! Then, when I rejected you, explaining I do not meet up with online nutjobs….you proposed Skype and later imagined this would be uploaded on YouTube. Again, more rejection from me as I do not want a seriously disordered person to have another way to reach me beyond this site…. You wouldn’t let it go, and became quite abusive in your posts. Again, not the actions of a stable person.

So, while Andrew and I are opposed on many issues, I do not wish her any ill will. James, I would surmise you have Narcissistic Personality Disorder, I consider you a dangerous person.
commented 2018-02-11 15:50:27 -0500
Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt,

Good faith.


Who are you trying to kid? You constantly attack or mock Andrew.

That’s funny that you think I have been triggered or offended – when you are unwilling to even have a common Skype debate, because you want to stay all warm and snuggly in your safe space. You are too stupid to trigger or offend me, but keep trying.