April 13, 2017

What’s With Gay Pride?

Gavin McInnesArchive

Dear gays: What are you so "proud" about? It's weird that so much of your energy is focused on what you do in bed.

(LANGUAGE WARNING)

No one cares. 

PS: Mike Pence never said he wanted to electrocute you, by the way. Let it go.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-04-14 22:02:05 -0400
Peter Netterville,

As I said repeatedly – there are countless things that science have not proven without a shadow of a doubt, but that they still maintain to be enough evidence for now to think a certain way until proven otherwise.

You know that already, so you are being disingenuous when asking for definitive scientific proof and think that backs up your position that it’s a choice in addition to justifying your hatred and disgust for gay people.

The majority of scientists are atheist/agnostic. The reason for that is because there is even less proof of a God or that anything in The Bible actually happened, then there is a gay gene.

Certainly there are exceptions as to why people are gay and I also concede that it is a choice for some ala being bisexual and the like, but we are not talking about that. We are talking if gay people are born that way on any level just generally speaking.

Now Glenn Craig per his comment below shares a lot of the same views that you have and isn’t liberal or anything else that you might call me, so what does he know that you don’t for him to say that of course people are born gay.

Yes or no – do you believe that people are born gay outside of any exception scenarios of conditioning or choice? In other words – if it is 10 from now or 50 years from now, would you be shocked if the gay gene is finally discovered?
commented 2017-04-14 21:31:38 -0400
What really makes me wonder about you, Jack, is you, a person who believes in science above all, throws a plethora of insults at me for wanting scientific proof that there is a gay gene.

It appears to me that you are throwing out science to believe that there is a “gay gene” when you would require absolute undeniable scientific proof that God exists. You accept a “gay gene” in faith, but attack me for wanting scientific proof.
commented 2017-04-14 21:12:13 -0400
And Jack, I could explain why I believe in God, but you would be even more hard headed about my explanation than you are with my position on the “gay gene”, so that is why I do not take your baiting/mockery of me about my belief in God. And with your head already so hard, I fear if it got any harder, your hair would cease to grow. I’m just thinking about you.
commented 2017-04-14 20:54:34 -0400
@ Jack

1. If we assume evolution is right (as people like you believe is absolute incontestable fact as solid as the ground you walk on), then a “gay” gene is contrary to the theory of evolution … ummm sorry, I mean the absolute undeniable incontestable unquestionable unchangeable unchallengeable truth of all truths called evolution.
2. If we assume creation, then a “gay” gene is contrary to God’s creation.

Either way, a “gay” gene in contrary to both beliefs. I’m sorry once again, one is undeniable incontestable truth and the other is a belief.

Have you considered that if it may not be a conscious choice, it could possibly be due to environmental and social upbringing? What if a boy’s or girl’s parents engaged in gay activity? The child learns then most in the first five years of life. The child would learn from his/her parents that gay activity is okay.

Is it not at least marginally possible that the child learned that gay activity is okay because he/she was not told otherwise, at least one trillionth of a percent chance?

I object to it being called a “gay” gene until there is proof, scientific proof, because there are other variables that can condition a person to gay tendencies. Variables that those who want to justify the “I could not help it I was born this way” excuse will not want to acknowledge.

And yes, sometimes I do think it is a willful choice.
commented 2017-04-14 20:46:26 -0400
Queer is a choice..!!
As well, the deeper the indoctrination the more likely you have a queer result.!!
commented 2017-04-14 17:29:23 -0400
Glenn Craig,

Well at least you are not a fucking moron like Peter, who thinks being gay is a choice, so I will give you credit there. I am glad you recognize reality.
commented 2017-04-14 17:25:49 -0400
Peter Netterville,

So because we don’t have the technology to prove without a shadow of a doubt that gay people are born that way, even though there have been various studies that point in that direction, is it your logical position that both boys who have only shown attraction to other boys and men that have only shown attraction to other men and have never been attracted to girls/women in any capacity are simply making a choice?

Is that the side you want to take until there is undeniable proof? Again, coming from a guy that believes in a man living in the sky and absolute fairy tales that have zero basis in fact or logic, but yet someone born gay is just too much for you to wrap your head around despite the bullshit you believe in. Hey that’s fine – it just simply confirms to me that you are an idiot.
commented 2017-04-14 16:50:59 -0400
@Jack Carter….I do not believe that homosexuality is a choice….if it was any contemporary male would be a fool not to choose it over the minefield that the “Vestal virgins” have created….but before you get too demanding about acknowledgement of biggotry…the “Vestal virgins” are the most boorish bunch of biggots this side of Johannesburg….Justin Trudeau’s pledge of white knighthood notwithstanding….and that is just TOO easy to prove.

The reason why I am more accepting of the outrageous queens like Milo and Caolin is because they recognize that their collective identity is with men and not with the Vestal virgins. The gay men who have sided with the veVestal virgins have committed far too great a betrayal to reasonably demand acceptance. And THAT is the biggest obstacle in the normalization of homosexuality…what comes in the package is herd of man hating harpies bent on the destruction of the male gender and the family.
commented 2017-04-14 13:09:17 -0400
Only the true representation of history will reveal whether The Rebel supporters are “On The Wrong Side Of History”, not Jack Carter’s obviously intellectually limited opinion.
commented 2017-04-14 13:06:45 -0400
Jack Carter, unable to prove that gays are born that way and unable to provide scientific proof, resorts to his fall back position … insults …

Jack pouted, "The Rebel – Home For Bigots And Homophobes On The Wrong Side Of History. "
commented 2017-04-14 13:04:17 -0400
Geoff Meek,

Racist white people who like to call black people nigger feel the same way as you do when it comes to gay people and being on the wrong side of history. Congrats that you have something in common with racist people.
commented 2017-04-14 13:01:27 -0400
The Rebel – Home For Bigots And Homophobes On The Wrong Side Of History.

Ezra should put that next to the logo.

Thankfully there are reasonable conservatives and Canadians overall that have no problem with gay people and this fucking cesspool doesn’t represent the majority of Canadians.
commented 2017-04-14 12:49:39 -0400
Jack, you better read my comment a few more times. You just didn’t get it (why am I not surprised)

When you say I’m on the wrong side of history you are actually saying that I am not following the Mob. You are right, I am not following the Mob, I prefer to think for myself about what is right and wrong.

“To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.” – G.K. Chesterton
commented 2017-04-14 12:28:03 -0400
Jack said, "Feel free to try to debunk this – instead of ignoring or deflecting. "

One of the cornerstone principles in the scientific process is the requirement for the scientist to be able to replicate the results.

From the article, “Many researchers were skeptical that an analysis of only 38 pairs of gay brothers was reliable, *and several other groups failed to replicate the results.”*

Your next proof, please!
commented 2017-04-14 12:23:48 -0400
It says right in the article, " … by identifying a stretch on the X chromosome likely associated with homosexuality. But several subsequent studies called his finding into question."
commented 2017-04-14 12:17:28 -0400
“As I said, there are countless things in science that haven’t been 100% proven because we currently lack the technology to do so and this is one of them … "

Then it is just conjecture and not proven. Can you not grasp that?

You claimed in no uncertain terms that those that are gay are born that way. But if it is not a proven scientific fact, then you are only believing the conjecture.

Therefore it is possible that the conjecture is wrong!

There have been numerous times in the history of scientific discovery that conjectures have been wrong, most often they are wrong.

The possibility exist, and is quite probable, that the conjecture that gay people are born that way is a wrong conjecture.

Can you not at least admit that with your “useless stump in your head that you call a brain”? (just extending your insult to you too)
commented 2017-04-14 12:09:29 -0400
Peter Netterville,

As I said, there are countless things in science that haven’t been 100% proven because we currently lack the technology to do so and this is one of them, however there is still enough information to make the claim that people are born gay.

The reality is that you use that lack of 100% proof to justify your utter contempt and hate for gay people.

This is especially hilarious considering you believe in fairy tales about a man that lives in the sky and watches over everything. That makes sense to you, but people born gay is just an impossibility to you.
commented 2017-04-14 11:58:14 -0400
Waiting for proof, Jack.

i.e. link to scientific proof in science journal articles, etc.

Not some youtube video. If there is no scientific proof then it is all just conjecture.

Not interested in conjecture, only scientific proof.

scientific proof please.
scientific proof only please.
commented 2017-04-14 11:47:59 -0400
Geoff Meek,

Sure it matter – gay men are not attracted to women. Just like you have no desire to have sex with a man. Are you suggesting that all gay people live a life without love and happiness?

Thankfully the majority of Americans and Canadians don’t have your out of touch thinking and have come to realize that they were on they were on the wrong side of history – which is where you are now.
commented 2017-04-14 11:42:09 -0400
Peter,

There are countless things in science that haven’t been 100% proven because we currently lack the technology to do so, however there is still enough information to make the claim that people are born gay.

Perhaps right wing Gavin McInnes can explain it to you in a way that will get through to that useless stump in your head that you call a brain.

Watch at the 2:50 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qm9lfWTGmDY
commented 2017-04-14 11:31:41 -0400
It doesn’t matter whether gays are born that way or not, It is still a perversion.

Sexual attraction is natures way of continuing life. Just think, if there was no sexual attraction, would there be any life on earth? Why would any living being do it? Therefore, sexual activity that doesn’t lead to reproduction is a perversion.

So knowing that, a good society shouldn’t promote a perversion.
commented 2017-04-14 10:20:33 -0400
Jack Carter claimed, " … you choose to ignore that they are born that way … "

Please provide scientific proof that gay people are born gay.

Notice the two words that paramount in my last sentence; scientific and proof.
commented 2017-04-14 09:42:02 -0400
Glenn Craig,

The same shit that everyone else does for the other 23 hours and forty minutes of their day.

Here’s a thought. If all parents educated their children right from the get go that gay people deserve the same rights as everyone else and there is nothing wrong with being gay (if they see two men kissing, it won’t be a big deal), then we can ensure that homophobia, bigotry and hate for gay people or a feeling that they are disgusting won’t exist in future generations.

People like Peter are only going to have kids that are just as homophobic, bigoted and have hate and disgust for gay people as the parents. Unless luckily as the children age, they realize just how fucked up their parents are with their archaic thinking.
commented 2017-04-14 07:48:44 -0400
@Jack Carter…I do see Gavin’s point…“I’m gay and proud of it” ….well la-te-da…what do you do with the other 23 hours and forty minutes of your day?

As for displays of public affection…hey …love is a many splendoured thing….but when it comes to letting the world know you are gay, let’s face it, British queens like Milo Yiannopolous and Caolin Roberts pull it off with more style, class and dignity than leather boy twinks in assless chaps who walk each other around on dog leashes and frankly I don’t think it is too narrow minded on the part of parents with young kids to make them refrain from doing that at Disneyland….“gay rights” notwithstanding.

And Jack…..I am certainly not the only one who has noticed that a “gay pride” parade is NOT the “we have arrived” victory parade that the ….“Vestal virgins”…are striving for….no…they want a “straight shame” parade….with the vanquished frog marched in dunce hats just like during the Chinese Cultural Revolution while being forced to chant “WE’RE HERE….CIS-GENDERED AND NOT QUEER….HOW COULD WE BE SO WRONG?”………….:-)
commented 2017-04-14 04:03:08 -0400
Jack’s omniscience is at work again. A prophet in our midst. He’s Santa Claus. He’s god. He knows what you think and what you do without ever seeing you. All hail Jack Carter!
commented 2017-04-14 03:03:51 -0400
Drew Wakariuk,

Well since sharia law will never happen in Canada, your question is clearly retarded, which is no surprise coming from you.
commented 2017-04-14 03:02:17 -0400
Drew Wakariuk,

You don’t get a parade, because you have never been without your rights. Gay pride is the celebration of gay rights and equality and the fight that they have had to go through and STILL go through.

Did that really need to be explained to you per your moronic suggestion of a straight pride parade? You haven’t had to fight for anything in this country.
commented 2017-04-14 02:05:56 -0400
Jack Carter there are many anti gay liberals as well. And i bet you would run to a safe space if you saw some of the things i saw at the swingers clubs.
commented 2017-04-14 02:03:34 -0400
Jack Carter when sharia law shuts down the parades who will you blame?