March 21, 2017

What the frick, Tomi Lahren?!

Faith GoldyArchive

Following her debut appearance on The View, in which she outed herself as pro-choice, Tomi Lahren's program has been suspended from The Blaze for a week.

While I'm usually #TeamTomi, I'm not buying that she thought this one through.

I dissect her dimwitted arguments in support of abortion and tell you why — according to science, the US Constitution and libertarian political philosophy — it's time for Tomi to rethink her stance and not give in to the temporary flattery from her natural enemies on the Left.

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-03-24 15:07:26 -0400
Nnaumbua Farrell,

Nope.

What you are suggesting doesn’t actually make sense. If I had posted 100 times under anonymous – all those posts would be switched to my name once I edited my name. I had actually posted a minute or two apart – once I noticed that my first post came up as anonymous and then went to correct that.

So do you want abortion to be illegal – you haven’t answered my question.
commented 2017-03-24 14:55:37 -0400
“Glitch”. You’re a liar.
commented 2017-03-24 13:01:39 -0400
Nnaumbua Farrell,

I don’t deny that the anonymous comment was from me. When I signed up, there was some sort of glitch and I had to put my name in again after I posted the first time. It just made sense to agree with the first post to get the conservation going over simply repeating the same comment.

I knew the anonymous would be changed once I entered my name. So you really haven’t uncovered anything here Sherlock – however you have proven that you are obsessed with me. That’s creepy.
commented 2017-03-24 12:15:36 -0400
I found something interesting “Richie”. It’s on the first comments page of this video.

RICHIE KOTZEN commented 2 days ago
Absolutely right.

RICHIE KOTZEN commented 2 days ago
Apparently Faith doesn’t understand that science and scientists are involved in the abortion process in Canada and America. Government didn’t just pick the number of weeks out of their ass."

For some reason your anonymous name was replaced with your current user name.

You posted anonymously and then replied to your own post to give the impression you weren’t the only dissenting opinion.

You’re a bald faced liar and a coward.
commented 2017-03-23 23:58:33 -0400
Nnaumbua Farrell,

This is all hypothetical. I am saying IF restrictions were introduced that are based only on facts and a majority of Canadians supported those restrictions, then that’s fine.

Again, I have only been commenting on abortion in a legal vs. illegal capacity.

Do you want abortion to be illegal?
commented 2017-03-23 23:20:12 -0400
What restrictions on abortion would make sense “Richie”?
commented 2017-03-23 13:20:36 -0400
Nnaumbua Farrell,

Depends on what is and why the change. If it something that makes sense and there are facts behind it in addition to something that a majority of Canadians want, then sure.
commented 2017-03-23 13:07:42 -0400
Is that a yes or a no?
commented 2017-03-23 12:54:15 -0400
Nnaumbua Farrell,

I have only been talking about abortion in a legal/illegal capacity.
commented 2017-03-23 12:42:07 -0400
Wait, you’d be fine with restrictions on abortion “Richie”?
commented 2017-03-23 12:05:51 -0400
Peter Netterville,

Based on your posts in general on The Rebel, I have to say that you are truly living in the wrong country -per your political and social views. Canada does not represent your views pretty much at all.
commented 2017-03-23 12:01:38 -0400
Nnaumbua,

Again, I guess you don’t understand the concept of four out of five Canadians that support abortion as of 2017. That is a majority by any standard. Abortion will never be illegal.

THE BEST YOU CAN HOPE FOR IS A REDUCTION IN WEEKS as far as restrictions go and if that happens – fine. It’s the legal/illegal factor that we are talking about.
commented 2017-03-23 11:55:16 -0400
Peter Netterville,

It’s not bullshit at all. Do you actually think abortions would stop if illegal or are you suggesting that women could still have safe abortions because there will be doctors willing to break the law to ensure the health of their fellow human being?
commented 2017-03-23 01:33:59 -0400
G.K.Chesterton said it well.
" Until I see a real pioneer and progressive leader coming out with a good, bold, scientific programme for drowning babies, I will not join the movement. "
commented 2017-03-22 22:06:51 -0400
Ritchie Kotzen said, “Would you really prefer that women die in back alley abortions without safety and regulations?”
The woman has a choice. The baby doesn’t. She doesn’t have to put her life in jeopardy at a back street abortionist. She has choices. There is support out there to get through pregnancies and put a baby up for adoption. There will always be abortion, but hopefully only very early term ones. If a woman can’t deal with that I have no sympathy. If a women gets raped or a pregnancy would put the mothers life at risk, say a cancer diagnosis or chronic condition, then abortion in very early term would unlikely be turned down. Nor should it in my opinion. But its not birth control. Get a grip.
Woman has a choice.
Baby doesn;t.
commented 2017-03-22 22:04:30 -0400
Children are the most wonderful people on the planet and need to be protected right from the womb until they are old enough to be adults.

In my opinion anyone who abuses children of any age should be euthanized.
commented 2017-03-22 21:52:32 -0400
Sorry “Richie”, the more people learn about abortion the more they’ll want it restricted or banned. The minority of Canadians in the Ipsos poll who support no limit abortion are probably like the people in the video:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0xWQHhqOAcg

They don’t know what they support and most of them stop supporting it when they see it. That’s why it’s necessary to use euphemisms like “choice”. You want to hide the truth about abortions.
commented 2017-03-22 21:52:24 -0400
What I find so disturbing is the pure unadulterated lust the pro-choice crowd has for murdering babies.

And every excuse under the sun is lied into existence by this crowd to justify taking tongs and ripping baby parts out of the womb piece by piece … all in the name of “a woman’s choice”.

Well, women who make the choice will pay for that murder.
commented 2017-03-22 21:46:28 -0400
Ritchie Kotzen said, “Would you really prefer that women die in back alley abortions without safety and regulations?”

That’s one of the bigger load of shit lies from the pro-murder-babies crowd.
commented 2017-03-22 20:46:50 -0400
Glenn Craig,

It’s over. You are delusional if you think abortion is ever going to be illegal or that abortions will stop even if it was illegal.

But I will play along – give me a ballpark time frame when abortion will be illegal in Canada if the debate isn’t over.
commented 2017-03-22 19:31:30 -0400
@richie Kotzen…
Oh and BTW Trudeau is a feminist…and he is going to keep saying he is a feminist until people say “so what”….I say "so what " every time he says it but he keeps on saying it anyway…sort of make’ s me think that he is either a tad autistic or he just doesn’t keep his word…and the ‘dithgusting’ ithlamophobia that is so prevalent in Canada…well that’s the thame dithgusting crowd who just don’t seem to give him the “so what” endorsement he so obsessively craves when he points out that he is a feminist….oh…you didn’t know already that he is a feminist? Well you really should by now because it is 2017 after all and he keeps saying it every media opportunity he gets…no matter how many people respond with “so what” …in spite of his promise. Perhaps it is the only line he has ever delivered in his total bomb acting career without lisping or stammering…..maybe he needs some coaching from that fellow in the movie “The King’s Impediment of Speach”….Oh BTW did I mention that he is a feminist….just thought I would remind you in case it slipped from your memory since I started typing this…yes siree…he is a feminist and he is just going to keep on saying he’s a feminist until he gets that coveted "so what " response…it is 2017 after all….in fact he just might keep on saying he’s a feminist even if you….like me….say "so what " each and every time he makes it the deflected point of discussion on TV or in question period….sort of like the Count on Sesame Street…the Count just loves to count and Justin just loves to remind you that he is a feminist…just in case it slipped your mind….it is 2017 and all …and he is just going to keep on saying he is a feminist until people say “so what”….of course he just might not keep his word and keep on saying it anyway…saying what you might ask? Why saying he is a feminist of course…..yessiree he’s here to tell you he’s a feminist …that’s for sure…and he’s just going to keep on saying it until he gets that “so what” response….

Now as we know the vast majority of Canadians are liberals…but that does not seem to stop Justin from reminding people that he is a feminist…and his liberal supporters just never seem to tire of being reminded so of course he will continue to remind us all day in and day out until it is time for another election….when he will run on a platform that he is a feminist and he will be increasing funding to the CBC and to academic feminists to continue scolding people on this perrennial and never ending topic and Richie…..

This has been going on longer than you have been alive…and no it ain’t over.
commented 2017-03-22 18:18:38 -0400
Below are abortion procedures described by a former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino. Viewer discretion advised.
commented 2017-03-22 13:22:28 -0400
Nnaumbua,

I guess you don’t understand the concept of four out of five Canadians. That is a majority by any standard. Abortion will never be illegal. The best you can ever hope for is a reduction in weeks.

So keep hoping for a politician to come around , become PM and make such changes, but don’t hold your breath.