February 27, 2019

Why didn't Labour back the Hezbollah ban?

Jack BuckbyRebel Contributor

Why didn’t Labour back the banning of terrorist organisation Hezbollah?

Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s move to ban the organisation entirely in the UK has gone through the Commons, but it doesn’t mean Labour was thrilled about it.

In fact, there was internal debate about it… and Jeremy Corbyn even suggested that there might not be enough evidence to show this group is dangerous and should be banned.

Do multiple terror attacks not constitute evidence?

I think we’re owed answers about this, from the Labour Party. Why exactly were they not totally in favour of this ban? Why the debate?

Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2019-02-27 19:52:40 -0500
Since 9/11 – IN THE NAME OF ISLAM (SATAN): 36,839 Attacks, 238,085 Killed, 317,082 Injured that we know of
commented 2019-02-27 19:38:03 -0500
I also need to learn to proof read.
commented 2019-02-27 19:36:14 -0500
Thanks for pointing that out Henry I made a mistake that I should have been aware of. My I apologize to any Jewish people I may have offended.
commented 2019-02-27 19:19:53 -0500
@Keith Barnes – “Islamic Shekels”?? You do realize that Shekels are the currency of Israel, the state officially loathed by pretty much all of the Islamic countries, don’t you?
commented 2019-02-27 18:18:58 -0500
The Labour Party are all dead beats and losers who rather than try and improve their lot, prefer to drag everyone down to their own level of mediocrity. I do not include the Remainers who have infested all political parties, these are people of the worst kind who follow the credo of Marxism and are willing to have their own race killed of in exchange for
Islamic Shekels.