December 02, 2015

Why you’re right to question the new religion of climate change - what politicians and media aren't telling you

Holly NicholasRebel Commentator

Climate change has become the new religion – and our politicians and the mainstream media aren’t telling you some of the facts.

The truth is that Earth temperatures have been changing for billions of years. And these changes are more rapid and intense than what we’re experiencing today. If you take a look at this figure – you can see that climate has been changing throughout Earth history. So why is it that climate alarmists only show a graph from 1880 to the present when Earth is 4.6 billion years old?

Climate really is changing - Rachel Notley mentioned that the Columbia Ice Field is melting, but she didn’t talk about the Laurentide Ice Sheet. This ice sheet was up to 3.2 km thick and covered North America, including Alberta, about 95,000 years ago and started to melt about 20,000 years ago until the majority of the sheet retreated by around 5,000 years ago, excluding Greenland – of course, the ice is still there.

Governments also rely heavily on data proposed by the IPCC, the International Panel on Climate Change. For one, using one source is not good practice in science and the models that they present often don’t agree. If data gathered by the IPCC varies so much, how can we call it concrete?

Earth temperatures and CO2 levels are at some of the lowest values in Earth history. If geologists and scientists are agreeing that climate change is a hoax, why is it being pushed so intensely by government? Is climate change really being used to push political agendas? We have politicians and bureaucrats telling us that it’s the worst threat to humans, an even greater threat than ISIS. Is this even feasible?

 

JOIN TheRebel.media for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

READ Ezra Levant's bestselling books debunking environmentalist propaganda against the energy industry:
Groundswell: The Case for Fracking
Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada's Oil Sands

Rachel Notley's Alberta NDP just announced a $3 billion a year carbon tax.
SIGN THE PETITION telling them to cancel this job-killing tax at StopTheCarbonTax.com

What You Can Do
  1. Subscribe to Premium content!
  2. Donate today to help keep The Rebel fighting!
  3. Visit The Rebel Store to get cool swag you won't find anywhere else.
  4. JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.
  5. Like TheRebel on Facebook
  6. Follow TheRebel on Twitter
Comments
You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2016-01-20 03:41:23 -0500
Man-made climate change is a hoax, based on junk science, doctored data, and scare propaganda.

There is zero empirical evidence, and the only thing warmists have to cling to is a fabricated opinion poll based on a keyword search. Hardly scientific; actually, an abject perversion of science.

Within the next two years this hoax will be busted and exposed, once the Republicans gain power in the US; since they are aware of the scam, they will also stop all funding going to the departments that perpetuate this hoax, like NOAA, NASA, UN, IPCC, COP, and the billions of dollars diverted to subsidized useless and highly speculative green and renewable projects, that just line crony pockets.

@climatefallacy
commented 2015-12-03 16:55:19 -0500
It’s never wrong to question and debate but Levant doesn’t even make an attempt to be properly informed. Not only is Levant out to lunch on this but he reports this nonsense to a substantial following. I’m not a fan of Gore or Suzuki either and nor do I want it to be true but anthropogenic climate change is a reality and EVERY comment /position stated above can easily be checked up on. Here’s a boring and somewhat lengthy but very useful treatise (that will save you a shitload of time) on the whole issue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo… Not saying taxation or anything else is a solution to the problem – infact technology and innovative ways to capture carbon are probably our best bet but being informed is better than being misinformed. . . . . . . . . . . . P.S. The series is a bit long but very worth it if you really want to get a feel for this whole thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP
commented 2015-12-03 15:54:17 -0500
I enjoyed this submission, Holly, it truly highlights how myopic the environmentalists have become. It’s ironic how environmentalists believe they have “science” and “evidence” on their side yet conveniently ignore very simple facts. It’s not unlike creationists who ignore radio-isotopic evidence that the world is older than 6,000 years old; only in the case of environmentalists they act as if the world is only 160 years old. It truly is a new religion, where so-called ‘scientists’ are the new priests, and the environmentalists want their Garden of Eden back, no matter who suffers, in fact suffering is the only way to atone for the ‘original sin’ of using fossil fuels.
commented 2015-12-03 03:50:29 -0500
Great video, Holly. I hope more people get to see your video.
commented 2015-12-02 19:25:28 -0500
Holly – great piece.
The federal NDP (and I assume given the strong affiliation the AB NDP to the federal NDP) are members of the Socialist International (SI) (http://socialistinternational.org/).
The Socialist International is the worldwide organisation of social democratic, socialist and labour parties. It currently brings together 152 political parties and organisations from all continents. As a non-governmental organisation, the Socialist International has consultative status (Category I) with the United Nations, and works internationally with a large number of other organisations.
Both the SI and the UN have mandates for a one world, one government. They just meet together before COP21.
Meeting of the Council of the Socialist International -Luanda, 27-28 November 2015
Declaration on climate change and COP 21
http://socialistinternational.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticleID=2410
12. Taking the lead at COP21
Without strong commitments in Paris, the future of the planet looks bleak. We believe that by following the above framework, COP21 can be the moment when the world unites to move towards a sustainable world society.

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare “admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.”
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021015-738779-climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism.htm

So much bullshit going on here under the guise of climate change. This socialist garbage has to stop.
commented 2015-12-02 18:51:17 -0500
I’ve gotten tired since Trudeau came to power that we have had a steady diet of climate related stories on the mainstream media. I also have to ask in light of the claim that global warming created Isis? Was it also global warming that was to blame for the early expansion of the Muslim religion into neighboring countries? Was it global warming that brought Hitler to power? The communist revolution? Honestly did whoever dream this up think it through logically?
commented 2015-12-02 16:11:37 -0500
According to Scientists, the levels of CO2 are falling. If they fall to far, every tree and plant on this planet will die. This will result in the death of all animals, including the Human animal.
Perhaps we should go back to coal fired generators. China, India and the USA are keeping us alive? Hmm.
commented 2015-12-02 14:53:03 -0500
If the talking heads really wanted to do something to save the planet they would begin by chastising China for killing their citizens with the air pollution caused by opening a new coal-fired electricity plant every week. That is the real threat to humans. Real pollution can be dealt with by taking these countries to task, but it is so much easier to blame us for our lifestyles than to cause a fuss with a foreign government that doesn’t give a shit about their lowly workers.
commented 2015-12-02 14:40:05 -0500
Climate change theory can be equated to the “flat Earth” theory. Some people (probably including scientists) are still believing in the “flat Earth” theory.
commented 2015-12-02 13:20:39 -0500
It depends on which 1880 US historical temperature graph that they show you. The original graph that used to appear at the GISS site before it was falsified by James Hansen shows no sustained warming and shows the fifty year cooling trend that started about 1931 and ended about 1979. The one that replaced it, shows warming that more closely matches the phony computer models that don’t work. The first link below shows the original graph. The second link shows the graph of the falsifications of the US historical temperature records.

https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_137-jul-31-06-18.jpg?w=640&h=450

https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/fig-d-1.gif?w=640