September 23, 2015

Women's issues debate: Too much ovary talk, not enough about jobs and economy

Sheila Gunn ReidRebel Host | The Gunn Show

Did you watch Up For Debate, a.k.a., the woman’s issues debate?

I tried. And I quit.

It was Harper Derangement mixed with Ovarian Supremacy of the highest order.

The MC, Jess Boilleau, even opened the debate by booing the Conservatives.

I’m tired of being told what to care about. I’m tired of feminists telling me that tax-free tampons are somehow more important than job creation and the debt load my kids will face.

Are we supposed to be surprised that Harper didn’t want to attend a debate where within the first 6 minutes, the MC openly proclaims she doesn’t like him?

I wouldn’t want to attend and I’m a woman.



JOIN for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.

SIGN UP FREE for exclusive Election 2015 coverage from The Rebel team!

JOIN OUR CROWDFUNDING CAMPAIGN to bring you fearless Canadian election reporting!

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2015-10-19 00:34:04 -0400

Elizabeth May’s leadership IS in serious doubt. Her presence in government and in the media DISGRACES the entire nation. Her DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT reached an UNFORTUNATE APEX on May 13th, 2015, when she clearly demonstrated that she is a MUSLIM-TERRORIST-LOVING CANADA-HATING LUSH by SCREAMING OBSCENITIES AND INSULTS to a room-full of people.

Observers have concluded that the ONLY profession that May appears to be suited for is as a restaurant waitress, a task that she will return to once she has lost the 2015 Canadian Federal Election. She may also be interested in obtaining training in bartending, a profession that will give her access to liquor in order to remain a lush and hurl drunken and embarrassing statements to rooms full of people.

commented 2015-09-26 17:28:05 -0400
Well Justin is sticking to the Liberal Party’s marriage vows to feminism and that means he is going to win a majority……the feminists aligned with the Liberal Party broker 51% of the population’s vote which is why the Liberals won the last election. Between the women being 51% and the GLBT being 10% of the population (according to an outdated study based on prison population) that makes 61% support committed to the Liberals…..that being the case why do we even bother with elections?

Status of Women Canada was created by an Order in Council back in the era of Trudeau senior. The cabinet of any elected majority could disband it with the stroke of a pen without even a requirement to refer the matter to the House. So why hasn’t the evil patriarcy done so?
commented 2015-09-24 22:22:09 -0400
Kenneth – the left wing parties will form a coalition, if they receive enough votes. They are going to try to unseat Harper, at any cost. If we the public do not give Harper a majority, Canada will go down to the socialists, which is exactly what the UN, and their useful idiots on the left want.
commented 2015-09-24 05:56:07 -0400
Tax free tampons are a no brainer.
commented 2015-09-23 19:25:31 -0400
Every time I see Lizzie,I get a image of a horse eating corn on the cob through a picket fence.
commented 2015-09-23 18:37:19 -0400
Gentle readers….you have no idea what it means to me to NOT need be the initiator and ice breaker on this thread. I can remember a human resources executive at Veteran’s Affairs Canada…throwing a hissy fit ….and calling me a Nazi to my face for uttering the words……“feminism is not a gender, it is a political ideology”.

This HR mandarin was not a woman……it was a male who got promoted far beyond his competence for singing in their choir…he bragged that he set a record for “employment equity” and “diversity”.

I asked…." How much was your performance bonus?…….thirty pieces of silver?"

Veteran’s Affairs Canada does employ former veterans…I know of a former captain who commanded Ghurka troops in Afghanistan….who is a “put away papers clerk” under a Liberal appointed feminist queen bee.

Fuck the Liberal Party and their notion of what is fair.
commented 2015-09-23 16:38:44 -0400
My worst political nightmare (yeah, I’ll admit it): An NDP minority government propped up by JT and Lizzie. It would be the inmates running the asylum. Can you imagine Lizzie as minister of equality? I’d be running for my life.
commented 2015-09-23 16:07:46 -0400
Thank you for your insightful analysis of the “debate”! It really did sound like a “bitch” session railing against Mr. Harper! Of course, wee Justin would show up! Some women think he is the greatest thing since “pickled eggs”!
commented 2015-09-23 15:29:03 -0400
Maybe somebody needs to Inform Stephen and Laureen Harper that he does not like women, I guess his kids were born by immaculate conception.
Obviously the “Women’s Issue” Debate was just an Anti-Oil, Anti-Man (Trudeau is effeminate enough to be acceptable), Anti-Free Market, Anti-Progress, Anti-Harper and most of all a National Socialist (Nazi – look it up) Feminist Rally. Linda Duncan, Rachel Notley and her band of whackos would have really enjoyed it but it makes Real Working Canadians cringe.
Good Job Sheila, watching as much as you did was probably more than I could tolerate before turning it off, like I had to do with the other debates. It would be fun to see which parties would accept a Rebel Debate. ;-)
commented 2015-09-23 15:25:17 -0400
Sorry Sheila, I read the commentary but I couldn’t watch the video. To me it’s like watching an Isis be heading video, once you watch it you can never “unsee it”
commented 2015-09-23 14:33:13 -0400
Sheila said, " A category five social justice shit storm will blow in"

Sheila, you are magical with your words. I love it.
Keep em coming.
How about the timing of Dizzy Lizzy saying “don’t worry, I am not going to eat the mike” as she goes all Freudian
commented 2015-09-23 13:42:01 -0400
tks Sheila
commented 2015-09-23 13:33:51 -0400
Terry said, “Don’t say “ovary”, Sheila. Ezra gets all uncomfortable and squinchy=-faced when female genitalia are discussed. Probably safer just to say “lady parts”.”

And once again, Terry Rudden instead of addressing the topic at hand, posts an insult. This is a common trend among the lower IQ socialists.
commented 2015-09-23 13:29:06 -0400
Prince you are stepping in it again with that remark. But, Oh well so be it because you are right. Except I believe it will be a tirade rather than a Tizzy.
But really can anyone listen to and watch what Shelia spoke about and not be disgusted with the so called ‘Feminist’. These are not feminist they are man haters. They hate men so much that they have lost all sense of feminism. One can’t even look at these ‘women’ and see females any more – just utter haters of everything male.
Sad, very sad.
commented 2015-09-23 13:21:01 -0400
Thanks for sharing this. I had no idea this took place. But clearly I didn’t miss anything. Same old far left love fest.
commented 2015-09-23 13:08:12 -0400
If Dizzie Lizzie looses her seat, she’d be a great stunt double for Donkey in the next Shrek movie.
commented 2015-09-23 12:45:12 -0400
Well said, Sheila. These were left-wing feminists, not representatives of women in general. Of course, these left-feminists claim to know and represent what’s best for women in general – just as the Communist Party (according to Lenin) knew better what was good for the working class than the working class itself! That’s why they never hesitated to suppress worker protests and up-risings behind the Iron Curtain. These left-feminists would suppress all women who do not accept their leadership – they already degrade them as “colonized” by the ‘patriarchy,’ “traitors,” and “prostitutes” selling themselves for bed and board. These feminists – unwittingly – support the prejudice that women can’t think logically. Their so-called ‘arguments’ are nothing but ad hominem attacks on people and not arguments. In first year logic you learn this is a serious logical error because it misses the point – and reduces intellectual debate into name-calling. Harper’s hair is really not relevant to his policies, nor is it immoral or illegal – so attacking it is a sign of intellectual bankruptcy.
commented 2015-09-23 12:21:36 -0400
This is a Dog Catchers Convention . . . wonder why Wynn was not there . . .
Poor insane left . . . 20th Century ideas for the 21st century . . .
commented 2015-09-23 12:08:09 -0400
I agree with Sheila Gunn Reid’s take on this.
The “gathering” was nothing but a group of hypocritical “new wave feminists” being gross and getting a hate-on. They certainly have nerve calling it a “Debate”. Amazing what these “new wave feminists” have turned feminism into: Once upon a time it stood against the inequalities in the workplace, in society, women fought for the right to vote, now it’s nothing but a hate-fest against men and our PM Harper. No different than Greenpeace being hi-jacked from its original intent by the eco-terrorists.
commented 2015-09-23 11:39:01 -0400
Joan oughta get into a tizzy over this — first Lauren and now Sheila are decrying “feminism”…
commented 2015-09-23 11:38:44 -0400
The angry stand up lesbian bitch looks stoned. The great news is that these vile angry women don’t breed. They can’t. Their anger prevents it from occurring. And it’s getting more difficult for these angry pigs to find a mate (a sucker). I guess there’s always a clinic and a test tube for these angry lesbian pigs.

Lizabutt May – GLUG GLUG GLUG – have another bottle of cheap booze you foul disgusting drunk.
commented 2015-09-23 11:37:47 -0400
Correction, Terry: these women are no ladies…
commented 2015-09-23 11:35:02 -0400
Don’t say “ovary”, Sheila. Ezra gets all uncomfortable and squinchy=-faced when female genitalia are discussed. Probably safer just to say “lady parts”.