January 24, 2017

Women siding with attacker “might have been the most appalling part” of Women’s March assault

Ezra LevantRebel Commander

On last night's show, our Alberta Bureau Chief Sheila Gunn Reid updated us on the assault she experienced while reporting on the Edmonton Women's March over the weekend. She also thanks Rebel viewers for their support, and helping identify the perpetrator so quickly.


You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-01-26 01:37:02 -0500
Hey Jack how about I “just graze your face”
I guarantee you’d cry like a girl.
commented 2017-01-25 11:53:46 -0500
Hey Bews you effeminate, pissant poltroon, you can run ya slimy little f**ker but you can’t hide.
Justice is stalking you. Consequence will find you. Cause and effect will hammer home the message,
Karma will kick your teeth in and no matter what the BS courts and bleeding-heart liberal judges let you off for – you will pay the price for your despicable girly-man behavior…eventually – and then when the universe has quit administering it’s justice, then you’ll have the rest of us really pissed of people to deal with. I just hope when the ‘crunch’ comes it can be captured on film!
Hey tough guy, you’re goin’ down! and it won’t be on your boyfriend…Bwahahahahahaha!
commented 2017-01-25 11:42:15 -0500
Sheila, maybe this will help you feel a little better. Your story is now international news and the comments from our friends south of the 40th indicate that the vast majority would like to get their mitts on this mangina or at the very least " have a small group of six year olds to put him down".
commented 2017-01-25 09:32:14 -0500
Doug Laird,

Again, I said that there should be consequences for being an asshole or making threats, but grazing her face with the camera was still an accident and not intentional. If he wanted to hit her, I suspect her face would show that through the bruises and bleeding.
commented 2017-01-25 07:45:28 -0500
OMG Jack, are you blind? The little twerp first tells Sheila to “get out of my fucking face” when he is the one who has approached a camera on a stationary tripod, turns partly away to surreptitiously (he thinks) remove his left mitten, turns back to the stationary camera to make his threat and then, with what can only be described as a look of maniacal anger, delivers the sucker punch immediately. This is not simply pushing a camera out of his face. You would have to be a fool to believe this was anything but pre-meditated, and while he may have intended to only harm the camera, Sheila’s face was behind that camera and he needs to be held accountable for his deliberate actions.

No apologist’s nonsense is acceptable.
commented 2017-01-25 07:24:33 -0500
To be fair and I am not saying that there shouldn’t be any consequences – but people have been pushing TV camera’s out of their face since the invention of the TV. I don’t think he intended to do any harm here – the camera just happened to graze Sheila.
commented 2017-01-25 07:07:19 -0500
After several evenings of seething over this incident and the reactions of the crowd around the TwerpPerp Dion Bews, I have decided that maybe it will be a good thing if (when??) our liberal-infused “justice” system finds a way to acquit this angry little loser, through either a technicality or a liberal judge’s interpretation of the law.

Because then a legal precedent will have been set.

And if I then find myself outside my “safe space” at one of these rallies and become “triggered” by one of their asinine, moronic protest signs, I will have the court-approved right to strike out at their signs with all the force I can muster (which is considerably more than the TwerpPerp was able to deliver against Sheila.) Whether their face is behind the sign or not.

The courts better get this one right and punish him to the full extent of the law, or it’s ON !!!
commented 2017-01-25 01:44:19 -0500
Well i guess it is fine to punch any liberal media camera now, that is not an attack according to the left.
commented 2017-01-25 01:43:18 -0500
The so called march for women is shown to be utter bullshit by the women there.
commented 2017-01-25 00:20:00 -0500
The woman who was acting as a ‘pacifier’ was actually and intentionally creating a distraction for Dion to get away.
We are proud of you Sheila for your bravery and dedication to bring us the truth.
commented 2017-01-24 23:03:17 -0500
Losers like Bews are common at Women’s Rally’s and protests. These men are either pussified and his female makes him come along, or they are men that have trouble getting dates, so they help the women organize hoping to meet a woman.
commented 2017-01-24 20:05:57 -0500
That’s good news. Might make some other loser think twice.
commented 2017-01-24 18:25:08 -0500
What happened to Sheila Gunn Reid was an actual assault, cannot believe it was not covered on MSM. When the (imaginary) claim by Haily Jarmain was presented media went crazy with coverage, when the raging grannies were evicted from the rally, media again went full on coverage. Sorry Sheila Gunn Reid that this happened to you, you are brave & courageous!
commented 2017-01-24 18:09:30 -0500
This young Gentleman needs to be castrated, to ensure that he dose not breed any more Scum, like himself.
commented 2017-01-24 17:02:49 -0500
What probably should have occurred to Dion Bews when he struck out at that camera was that he did not just strike out at Sheila…he struck out at EVERYONE on the other side of that camera….so of course a mob came after him.
commented 2017-01-24 16:05:29 -0500
Sheila, Holly, Lauren and Faith should all be carrying pepper spray and darn well use it when attacked. Just a little dab will do ya.
commented 2017-01-24 15:37:42 -0500
Typical reactions of the progressive liberals: blame the victim, deflect the criticism, deny it happened, protect the aggressor, champion the violence, name-call, etc. I am surprised that these liberals are not putting the blame onto Mr. Harper!

Oh, by the way, do any of you remember that judge asking the victim “Why didn’t you keep your legs together?” Or Elbowgate? Or the Ghomeshi Trial?

Perhaps the governments of the provinces, the federal government, and the people of Canada need to read “The International Declaration on the Protection of Journalists” in its totality. http://ipi.media/international-declaration-on-the…/ Pay particular attentin to the responsibilities of states: States shall promote a safe and enabling environment for journalists to perform their work independently and without undue interference.

States shall take appropriate steps to prevent violence, threats and attacks against journalists and media workers and shall ensure accountability for crimes committed against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel. In particular, all states should adopt, adequately fund and ensure the successful functioning of specific mechanisms to guarantee the safety of journalists working within their borders.

Governments cannot pay lip service to this!
<-- /_page_stream.html -->