June 09, 2017

Wynne's transgender bill "legitimizes mental disorder"

Rebel Staff

Ontario’s government recently passed a law (Bill 89) that gives the government the right to take away children from families if they don’t accept their child’s chosen “gender identity.” 

These multiple gender identities come from academics-- postmodernists and constructionists-- who theorize that nothing in this universe is absolutely true, even your own gender, but rather, its relative and up for interpretation.

So, it’s official. Ontario’s government is the physical manifestation of a Tumblr blog.

There are only two genders. Your gender is attracted to your sex. If not, you have a disorder.

We need a government that’s pro-family and pro-reality.


You must be logged in to comment. Click here to log in.
commented 2017-06-12 19:53:56 -0400
114 genders?? i thought 32 was delusional.
commented 2017-06-11 21:27:22 -0400
Spot on!!!
commented 2017-06-11 17:53:33 -0400
I didn’t think of that before Space Moose, it will be an Ontario government nightmare down the road some time. Wynne doesn’t care, it probably won;t be in her reign of terror.
Those suits will keep Ontario lawyers busy for decades!
commented 2017-06-11 03:47:02 -0400
This trans bill is the modern equivalent of the residential schools. Mark my words. This will result in the government getting sued, and us tax payers forking over the money.

Instead of natives saying the government took their culture, it will be trans people saying the government took their genitals.
commented 2017-06-10 22:53:49 -0400
Yvon, speaking for myself, because of course who else would I be speaking for, all I ask is for adults not to sexualize children, or tell me I have to accept it as well as parental interference in the form of a Wynne’s bill 89. If you are queer,gay or what ever your preferred pronoun is, I would only ever have a problem with it if you expect to have it taught to children as a viable alternative to normal sexual relations. You do agree that anything other than a male and female sexual union is an aberration, an deviation from the norm? A very small portion of the population are actually queer. I make no judgment here except to say that the reason that is a good thing is because humankind would self extinguish if everyone was queer. Quite simply children have the right to be autonomous, and adults do not have the right to mess with a child’s innocence and their natural sexual development. Be as queer as you want ‘most’ of society is ‘live and let live’, but mess with my kids sexual development and there will be repercussions. I don’t live in Ontario but if I did I would pack up my kids and leave if Wynne refuses to back off. I don’t spend much time thinking about the queer population unless I am expected to accommodate them at the expense of my children’s innocence.
commented 2017-06-10 21:57:59 -0400
A different name…
Same queer troll.!!
commented 2017-06-10 21:46:03 -0400
Oops, quite a blow to religions and other fictional silliness!
commented 2017-06-10 21:24:41 -0400
Hey Weber, did you take a course somewhere to learn how to be such a useless asshole or does it come natural to you?
I ask because you seem to be a perfect specimen for why more and more people today are beginning to see what all you fags and commies are really all about, and it’s not hate or fear they’re feeling – you know what you lefty freaks and retards label as bigotry and homophobia – they’re feeling disgust and contempt for you…
Your days are numbered (the left) so crawl back under your rock before some good citizen steps on you and squashes you like the stinky little dung beetle that you prove yourself to be, on a regular basis. Pffft.

N.B. Generally I give the advice – don’t feed the trolls.
But I also feel the need to vent on them every once in a while too – what a bunch of losers. LOL.
Trolls and troll feeding is pretty much a waste of space…
commented 2017-06-10 19:34:22 -0400
So let me get this straight, pardon the pun, this woman leaves her husband and children for another woman. Appoints a sex offender to write sex education for children in her schools, among other scandels and the people of Ontario re-elect her. Never mind Wynn what is wrong with the people of Ontario.
commented 2017-06-10 19:02:43 -0400
The fact remains that ‘unconventional’ families do exist. Sexualizing children should be against the law, and in fact I thought it was. Contributing to gender confusion is also a form of child abuse in my opinion. At this sensitive time in a child’s development when they are trying to discover for themselves about their own sexuality, all this gender confusing politically motivated government interference is absolute child abuse. Politically motivated child abuse.

As well children have a right to remain children until they start becoming curious on their own, uncoached! It is not the right of especially the government, to impose sex ed. on children who only want to play, jump and sing. Leave those kid’s alone to develop naturally!
This is why people think Wynne should be legally reprimanded. Her proclamations considering her position of power is child abuse on a huge scale and it should not be accepted as something to emulate.
commented 2017-06-10 18:42:25 -0400
Children need to come first not the agenda of a government or group. Typically parents are the best choice to over see the environment in which their children are brought up. Not only because it is their legal and fundamental right, but because as long as the child is being fed,clothed, kept from physical harm (from any source) and given access to education, parents NOT government are the best bet for making important decisions concerning their child’s well being until they are grown and legally an adult. It is the law. Wynne is making a new law which overrides the old law and it is indeed an attack as well as an infringement on the autonomy of traditional families. So yes Andrew, bill 89 diminishes our rights.
commented 2017-06-10 14:40:40 -0400
Keep in mind Andrew… Suffer not the children…
Liza made a powerful statement and the caliber of your reply to her is not even close to being in the same league.. you try to minimalize the statement that she made by referring to unconventional families as the norm.
There is only two kinds of genders in case you haven’t noticed.. One is male and the other is female representing men and women.
And there is only one kind of family and that is a strong one held together by traditional values and traditional values are the values that carried us through multiple millennial’s with success and in this day we are watching the decline of society because of interference by elected civil servants who serve another agenda.
None are so blind as those who will not see.!
commented 2017-06-10 14:29:18 -0400
I don’t think so Kelly…
That would only empower people like you and the government who believe that it’s OK to smell fecal matter on your boyfriends breath..
Personally I like The Red Ensign…
In that day when that flag flew Canada was a respected nation and held high moral priorities.
Treason was recognized as a crime and the death penalty held those who would be accountable in check.
Back then we were the
“True North strong and free”
We were a God-fearing nation of people who knew their neighbors and could leave their houses unlocked when they left them.
Since that time to
thus we have de-evolved into a criminal state where our elected civil servants are no longer held accountable for the atrocities and crimes that they bring to a once free nation.!!
commented 2017-06-10 14:19:04 -0400
Liza Rosie

Expanding family rights to unconventional families does not diminish the rights of traditional ones.
commented 2017-06-10 14:13:23 -0400
LEVITICUS 2013 , good idea. You and Dan can fly the rainbow 🌈 flag.
commented 2017-06-10 13:48:48 -0400
Dan Mancuso said..
“I know I’m not alone in feeling this way – what’s it going to take before The People get mad enough to render some justice on all these evil, criminal dirt-bags working so hard and diligently, using your money to destroy Canada?
What’s it going to take…”
Let everybody know how you feel by flying a different Canadian flag at your house, cottage or place of business.
By doing so it is a unmistakable jab at the present government and making them fully aware that the present government under this flag the “Canadian maple leaf” is not recognized.
Flags are a powerful statement and have been throughout the course of mankind’s history and have been used to unite people in a common cause.!
commented 2017-06-10 02:42:22 -0400
Funny how we are all supposed to be celebrate pride week , but then we are told not to care at the same time.
commented 2017-06-10 02:41:18 -0400
Andrew Stephenson why do people care if someone owns a gun, it is a free country.
commented 2017-06-10 02:40:13 -0400
Jimmy Reece left wing sites are still going apeshit over Comey and still spouting off about their imagined scandals , it is what they do. Now go get all upset over a cartoon like a good liberal.
commented 2017-06-10 02:38:59 -0400
Funny i thought the left stayed out of peoples bedrooms? All i see is them sticking their noses into everyones bedrooms.
commented 2017-06-10 02:36:59 -0400
Jimmy Reece i notice you stereotype like a pro, your bigotry is showing. Does that go for SJW’s who brainwash their kids into this hogwash? Or does your hate filled mind only see bad things when Christians do them?
commented 2017-06-10 02:34:00 -0400
Andrew Stephenson yeah who cares if some warped idiot makes them think that they are not what they are, you are a moron.
commented 2017-06-10 02:10:13 -0400
Wynn should not be making laws for degenerates, she should be in jail.

The entire agenda of Wynn’s pervert Marxism is to culturally gaslight hetero culture into a paralysis of self-loathing, guilt loading and normalized psychopathy at which point the culture is turned over to those who have done the least to build it.
commented 2017-06-10 01:38:59 -0400
It’s aimed at people who adopt kids. It’s compeltely reasonable. You don’t want people trying to pray the gay out of kids they adopt. The state has a responsibility to not put these kids into that sort of situation.

It is a new law – it replaces a law from 1985. It is not just about transgender adopted kids. It’s actually a response to an inquest about a 7 year old who was killed by her legal guardian. Right wing sites saw sexual identity and went apeshit and ignored the actual law. Not shocked. It’s what they do.
commented 2017-06-10 01:07:24 -0400
Andrew Stephenson I seem to recall you mentioning something or referring to your partner with the pronoun he. So you are probably without children, and less ‘family’ orientated than a heterosexual. Not necessarily but statistically. No problem. However I do have a question for you. Why is it that most people don’t bother people of other sexual orientations providing they don’t expect special recognition or treatment and many, not all, but many gay’s and gender confused think the general public should share in their apparent disregard and in some cases even disgust with the traditional family? Even going so far as Wynne is in Ontario, by doing everything she can, to disempower parents and destroy the integral family?. Is the queer community so dysfunctional that they are threatened by normal sexuality and traditional families? Why do they want to destroy that? Until a child is of legal age it is a parents duty and right to guide and sometimes over ride their child’s wishes, without the interference of government. This bill is truly astounding!
By the way it’s not going to happen. Parents will revolt. No Canadian is going to accept that kind of twisted government interference when it comes to their offspring. Our children do NOT belong to the government Kathleen Wynne.
commented 2017-06-10 00:42:07 -0400
This is totally criminal. Criminal gov’t.
commented 2017-06-10 00:37:25 -0400
Thanks Jay for standing up for sanity. Well done.
commented 2017-06-09 21:05:38 -0400
Andrew Stephenson; If you’re talking about adult people that’s your choice. If you’re talking about children then the answer is I care.